Archive

Archive for the ‘Obamacare’ Category

To The obama Snuggling Youth In America – We Told You So, You Stupid Little SOB’s

October 12, 2013 10 comments

Why Is Obamacare Raising Premiums on Young Adults?

Many Americans are worried about the cost of Obamacare, and the opening of the health-care exchanges has millions of would-be insurance buyers seeing rates they’ll pay for the first time. Several studies have shown that young adults in particular are likely to pay more under the Affordable Care Act. But why is this the case, and what impact will it have on Obamacare’s success?

In the following video with Dan Caplinger, the Fool’s director of investment planning and author of the special free report “Everything You Need to Know About Obamacare,” Motley Fool health-care bureau chief Max Macaluso asks Dan about the controversial topic of why many young adults will pay more. Dan cites one study that points to increases for young adults in all 50 states, with very large increases in some areas of the country. Among the reasons are the fact that many young adults prefer lower-cost policies that don’t provide as comprehensive coverage as Obamacare requires, essentially forcing them to upgrade to coverage that many of them don’t believe they need. Moreover, technical aspects of the Affordable Care Act also promote more even distribution of insurance premium costs across the age spectrum, potentially putting some of the overall health-care burden on young adults that they otherwise wouldn’t have to bear.

Max and Dan conclude with a discussion of the potential investing fallout from higher premiums on young adults. With President Obama and former President Clinton both pointing to the need for young adults to participate in the health-insurance exchanges for Obamacare to reach its full potential, a failure to attract enough young adults could cause problems for the program and for WellPoint (NYSE: WLP  ) , which has been most aggressive in establishing exchange-based coverage options. Yet even UnitedHealth (NYSE: UNH  ) and Humana (NYSE: HUM  ) , which haven’t participated as much as WellPoint, could see fallout if young adults give up on seeking health insurance entirely.

Source

TWG: And now they whine and moan about the very travesty we’ve tried warning them about.  The stupid little SOB’s supporting the obama regime, all the while ridiculing us, demonizing us, assaulting us, violating our rights and spitting in our faces as we tried to warn them about this mess they so enthusiastically embrace.  Just wait until they find out they’ve been embracing and advocating for their own slavery, suffering and total demise by the very hooves of those they’ve been brainwashed to idolize.  Here’s your “hope and change” you stupid little smug-faced assholes.  You can thank the so-called “educators” and your apathetic, uncaring parents for destroying your feeble little minds.  You have embraced your own demise, and I no longer feel ANY sympathy for you.   Now get to work. YOU have bills to pay.  BIG bills.  And may the hammers and sickles sit lightly across your scrawny little necks as you lick the hooves that feed you gruel.   After what you’ve done to me, as I’ve been out here fighting for YOU, I won’t shed a single tear for you when you find yourselves on your knees.   You wanted obama’s “hope & change”, HERE IS ONLY THE BEGINNING OF YOUR SUFFERING.

childrendumbeddowninschoolsobamawithoutthemask

Lying Lunatic, barbara boxer, Says: “OBAMA CUT THE DEFICIT IN HALF!”

October 2, 2013 4 comments

.

OK, something needs to be done to these lying lunatics.  Here’s some ideas:

A) Test them for drug and alcohol abuse. If they refuse the testing, put them into straight jackets and force it

B) If found not under the influence of drugs and/or alcohol, put them into straight jackets, arrest convict and punish them accordingly for their numerous crimes and treason

C) Put them each in straight jackets. apply ball gags and force them to listen to the reading of the Bible, PARTICULARLY the Ten Commandments, ten times each

D) Put them in straight jackets, ball gag them and put them to pasture with a pack of those wolves and pitbulls they Love so much.

E) Put them into straight jackets, put porky pig masks on them and put them into a room filled with muslim terrorists they Love so much. Leave them there for at least a week

F) Put them into straight jackets and lobotomize them

Watch and listen to this deranged LUNATIC tell the world that her messiah, obama has “CUT THE DEFICIT IN HALF!”   This would be laughable if these monsters weren’t so deeply evil and diabolical.

BLAMMO!!! Judge Jeanine Pirro Hits Another Home Run Against The Marxist-In-Chief obama

September 28, 2013 1 comment

OK, OK….. I’m starting to like Judge Jeanine Pirro these days. She is starting to call this horrid regime out in NO uncertain terms.   Too bad more “journalists” aren’t telling the truth in this way…..

 

 

Veterans: Disenroll from VA or No Obamacare Subsidies

September 25, 2013 Leave a comment

Once AGAIN, the obama regime lies to, then gives both middle fingers to our Beloved Veterans.  How can ANY Veteran support this marxist regime after what they’ve done to them?   How can ANYONE support this trash?  Anyone supporting this ISMARXIST TRAITOR.

http://www.northernbroadcasting.com/Talk/FlintReportHeadlines/tabid/519/ID/9914/Veterans-Disenroll-from-VA-or-No-Obamacare-Subsidies.aspx

obamafuckyou

Top Ten ObamaCare Horror Stories the Media Are Covering Up


 

by John Nolte 22 Mar 2013, 12:36 PM PDT

 

Because the mainstream media lobbied every bit as hard as Obama to win passage of ObamaCare, they are every bit as invested in doing whatever is necessary to see that it is perceived as a success. Unfortunately for Americans who expect truth from their media, this means the media are having to manufacture a false reality that says ObamaCare is, to steal a phrase, “doing fine.”

In order to manufacture this phony reality, the media must further sell their blackened soul by violating one of their most cherished principals: reporting on how government policy hits America’s weakest the hardest. It’s just a fact that the worst fallout of ObamaCare is already landing hard on the working class, who are losing work hours, jobs, and their insurance.

Usually when a government policy hits the working class, the media will fall all over themselves to “tell their personal stories.” But not these people. The media perceives these poor souls as sacrifices to a bigger cause known as The State.

So with that in mind, I present to you (with big hat tips to Drudge and Investors Business Daily) the top ten ObamaCare horror stories the media is willfully covering up….(Con’t)

 

CONTINUE READING: http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2013/03/22/Top-Ten-ObamaCare-Stories-Media-Covering-Up

obamacarewaivers

obamacaretaxschemeobamacaretax

obamacaremarxistmurderers

Enviro-Eugenicists Announce Mass Die-Off To Depopulate The World

March 17, 2013 1 comment

Here’s another jaw-dropping report on “The Big Die Off” scientists claiming that murdering mass populations is exactly what they intend to do to us.   Sad to know that the majority of people in this Nation haven’t a clue what “Eugenics” means, who (AND WHAT)  obama appointed as his “Science & Technology” Czar and just how deep this evil slithers.  It’s so outrageous, diabolical and incomprehensible that most people simply will not believe it.  Try to explain it to them and you will be labeled some sort of lunatic.

Here it is, for all to see….. whether they believe it or not: http://explosivereports.com/2013/03/15/enviro-eugenicists-announce-mass-die-off/

I want to know what that E-V-I-L eugenics freak and Ehrlich prodigy, Czar John Holdren, has been cooking up for us in the dark crevices of our White House. With NO Science degree, John Holdren is obama’s “Science and Technology” Czar. Holdren co-wrote a book in 1977, Ecoscience, with Paul and Ann Ehrlich, the eugenics gurus. Population control, a book that mused openly about mass sterilizations, forced abortions, putting sterilants in the water to control the population. It’s the fact that his ideological mentors, including one of the top international eugenics members most renowned, again, for promoting these same ideas of social engineering through the guise of “science” that basically amounts to eugenics and taking away babies from “undesirables”. He was paying homage to this mentor as recently as two years ago at one of the most prominent science gatherings of the country, the AAAS gathering, and there has been little, if any public questioning about it.

Some of obama’s czars have things that are so frightening in their past that no American would approve– if these guys were being appointed by Republicans, the left would be on fire with this. They’d be calling for their treason trials and publicly open town square lynching.

Apparently not only is he in favor of zero population growth but also zero economic growth. He wanted a zero GDP, and here’s one of the quotes in the book that he co-wrote, Ecoscience:

“…. it is now abundantly clear that the GNP cannot grow forever. Why should it? Why should we not strive for zero economic growth as well as zero population growth.” Is there any question in your mind why the obama regime has been so busy systematically decimating all production and manufacturing in our Nation?

Czar John Holdren’s mentor, Harrison Brown, saw the world population as ”a pulsating mass of maggots”. Holdren himself describes the world population as “useless eaters”.

In a section on “Involuntary Fertility Control,” Holdren and the other authors discuss various “coercive” means of population control — including putting sterilants in the drinking water. His concern? “The problem with that method is GETTING THE PEOPLE TO DRINK IT.”

Here’s a few excerpts:

“The third approach to population limitation is that of involuntary fertility control. Several coercive proposals deserve discussion, mainly because some countries may ultimately have to resort to them unless current trends in birth rates are rapidly reversed by other means. …

“Adding a sterilant to drinking water or staple foods is a suggestion that seems to horrify people more than most proposals for involuntary fertility control. Indeed, this would pose some very difficult political, legal, and social questions, to say nothing of the technical problems.”

“To be acceptable, such a substance would have to meet some rather stiff requirements: it must be uniformly effective, despite widely varying doses received by individuals, and despite varying degrees of fertility and sensitivity among individuals; it must be free of dangerous or unpleasant side effects; and it must have no effect on members of the opposite sex, children, old people, pets, or livestock. …

“…this plan has the advantage of avoiding the need for socioeconomic pressures that might tend to discriminate against particular groups or penalize children.”

Later, he concludes, “Most of the population control measures beyond family planning discussed above have never been tried. Some are as yet technically impossible and others are and probably will remain unacceptable to most societies (although, of course, the potential effectiveness of those least acceptable measures may be great).

“Compulsory control of family size is an unpalatable idea, but the alternatives may be much more horrifying. As those alternatives become clearer to an increasing number of people in the 1980s, they may begin demanding such control. A far better choice, in our view, is to expand the use of milder methods of influencing family size preferences, while redoubling efforts to ensure that the means of birth control, including abortion and sterilization, are accessible to every human being on Earth within the shortest possible time. If effective action is taken promptly against population growth, perhaps the need for the more extreme involuntary or repressive measures can be averted in most countries.”

“To date, (1977) there has been no serious attempt in Western countries to use laws to control excessive population growth, although there exists ample authority under which population growth could be regulated. For example, under the United States Constitution, effective population-control programs could be enacted under the clauses that empower Congress to appropriate funds to provide for the general welfare and to regulate commerce, or under the equal-protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Such laws constitutionally could be very broad. Indeed, it has been concluded that compulsory population-control laws, even including laws requiring compulsory abortion, could be sustained under the existing Constitution if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the society. Few today consider the situation in the United States serious enough to justify compulsion, however.”

This comes in a section discussing population law. The authors argue that compulsory abortions could potentially be allowed under U.S. law “if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the society.”

Czar Holdren’s view of the imminent and grave global dangers posed by overpopulation should provide pause, given his current view that global warming now presents imminent and grave global dangers. Keep in mind that this book (Ecoscience) was written in 1977.]

I’d sure like to know what that evil beasts has been cooking up for the American people since he took the throne anointed him by the obama regime. Out of all the treasonists, trolls, demons and terrorists slithering about obama’s regime, Czar Holdren is the only one that truly gives me nightmares.

holdren

Scared of Obamacare’s IPAB? Meet the USPSTF!

February 27, 2013 Leave a comment

By on 2.27.13 @ 6:08AM

Those unelected boards are coming into their own, making decisions for doctors and patients alike.

In the fight over Obamacare, one of the hottest points of contention has been the Independent Payment Advisory Board (IPAB), an unelected body with powers so broad that it has been called a “super-legislature” by some, and a potential “death panel” by others. Major policies set by the IPAB will have the force of law unless they are explicitly blocked by Congress. The usual order, of course, is that Congress is supposed to make the laws and bureaucrats are supposed to follow them.

.

CONTINUE READING: http://spectator.org/archives/2013/02/27/scared-of-obamacares-ipab-meet

“Health System” Advocates Push For Fingerprinting Gun Owners in obamacare Schemes

January 1, 2013 3 comments

By and , Published: December 30

The words were tucked deep into the sprawling text of President Obama’s signature health-care overhaul. Under the headline “Protection of Second Amendment Gun Rights” was a brief provision restricting the ability of doctors to gather data about their patients’ gun use — a largely overlooked but significant challenge to a movement in American medicine to treat firearms as a matter of public health.

The language, pushed by the National Rifle Association in the final weeks of the 2010 debate over health care and discovered only in recent days by some lawmakers and medical groups, is drawing criticism in the wake of this month’s schoolhouse massacre of 20 children and six educators in Newtown, Conn. Some public health advocates, worried that the measure will hinder research and medical care, are calling on the White House to amend the language as it prepares to launch a gun-control initiative in January….

CONTINUE READING: http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/nra-fingerprints-in-landmark-health-care-law/2012/12/30/e6018656-5066-11e2-950a-7863a013264b_story.html

Military Veterans Facing Infringement Of Their Second Amendment Rights

December 4, 2012 3 comments

TWG: Another reason the lefties are getting so involved in Veterans causes. Notice how they’ve suddenly created a plethora of groups “dedicated” to returning Veterans?  They’re diligently working to get as many Veterans as possible labeled with the “PTSD” illness in order to disarm them.   Liberals involved in Veteran’s health and well being is a ruse. Don’t fall for it, Veterans.  Their goal is to disarm you, drug you up and steal your rights.  

 

Veterans’ gun rights a sticky issue in defense bill

Published December 03, 2012

Associated Press

  • ShumerCoburn2.jpg

    Sen, Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., left, talks with Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., on Capitol Hill in Washington, during President Barack Obama’s State of the Union address in Washington. (AP)

WASHINGTON –  Should veterans deemed too mentally incompetent to handle their own financial affairs be prevented from buying a gun?

The issue, for a time last week, threatened to become the biggest sticking point in a $631 billion defense bill for reshaping a military that is disengaging from a decade of warfare.

Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., sought to amend the bill to stop the Veterans Affairs Department from putting the names of veterans deemed too mentally incompetent to handle their finances into the National Instant Criminal Background Check System, which prohibits them from buying or owning firearms.

Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., objected, saying the measure would make it easier for veterans with mental illness to own a gun, endangering themselves and others.

“I love our veterans, I vote for them all the time. They defend us,” Schumer said. “If you are a veteran or not and you have been judged to be mentally infirm, you should not have a gun.”

Currently, the VA appoints fiduciaries, often family members, to manage the pensions and disability benefits of veterans who are declared incompetent. When that happens, the department automatically enters the veteran’s name in the Criminal Background Check System.

A core group of lawmakers led by Sen. Richard Burr, R-N.C., has for several years wanted to prohibit the VA from submitting those names to the gun-check registry unless a judge or magistrate deems the veteran to be a danger. This year’s version of the bill has 21 co-sponsors. It passed the Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committee by voice vote, a tactic generally reserved for noncontroversial legislation. Coburn’s amendment to the defense bill contained comparable language.

“All I am saying is, let them at least have their day in court if you are going to take away a fundamental right given under the Constitution,” Coburn said in the Senate debate last Thursday night.

Congressional aides said Coburn will likely drop his effort to amend the defense bill with his proposal, but that he intends to try again on other bills coming to the Senate floor.

The number of veterans directly affected by the VA’s policy doesn’t appear to very large. Only 185 out of some 127,000 veterans added to the gun-check registry since 1998 have sought to have their names taken off, according to data that the VA shared with lawmakers during a hearing last June.

Still, the legislation over the years has attracted strong support from the National Rifle Association and various advocacy groups for veterans.

“We consider it an abject tragedy that so many of our veterans return home, after risking life and limb to defend our freedom, only to be stripped of their Second Amendment rights because they need help managing their compensation,” Chris Cox, the NRA’s chief lobbyist, wrote last year in an editorial.

The NRA did not respond to queries from the AP about Coburn’s latest effort.

Dan Gross, president of the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence, said gun control advocates consider the VA’s current policy reasonable.

“We’re talking about people who have some form of disability to the extent that they’re unable to manage their own affairs,” Gross said. “If you’re deemed unable to handle your own affairs, that’s likely to constitute a high percentage of people who are dangerously mentally ill.”

Tom Tarantino, chief policy officer for Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America, said veterans with a traumatic brain injury or post-traumatic stress disorder but who pose no threat to others are possibly being barred from gun ownership. The current restrictions might even be a disincentive for veterans to seek needed treatment, he said.

“We want to remove these stigmas for mental health treatment. It’s a combat injury,” Tarantino said. “They wouldn’t be doing this if you were missing your right hand, so they shouldn’t be doing it if you’re seeking treatment for post-traumatic-stress-disorder or traumatic brain injury.”

VA officials have told lawmakers they believe veterans deemed incompetent already have adequate protections.

For example, they said, veterans can appeal the finding of incompetency based on new evidence. And even if the VA maintains a veteran is incompetent, he can petition the agency to have his firearm rights restored on the basis of not posing a threat to public safety.

Source: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/12/03/veterans-gun-rights-sticking-point-in-defense-bill/#ixzz2E6pW1R7j

Five States That Voted For Marxist obama About To Get Hit With TOP TAX INCREASES.

November 21, 2012 6 comments

While I’m sad for the American Conservatives who have to suffer this, I wouldn’t give the teeniest, tiniest, turdiest turd about the DIMS who have to suck this up.  THIS is what “social justice” looks like.  HA!  They get what they voted for.   Just wait until they see how many companies are shutting down because of the obamacare scheme.   I’ve seen lists that are JAW DROPPING.  Those that voted for marxism are about to see what consequences look like.  BOOT MARKS ACROSS THEIR SCRAWNY LITTLE NECKS AND WHIP MARKS ACROSS THEIR BONY, BOWED BACKS. I’ll spit on their DAMNED graves. “Elections have consequences” SUCKERS.

Sandy-Ravaged New Jersey Families Face $6,933 Tax Hike in Fiscal Cliff Stalemate

November 21, 2012

(CNSNews.com) – Families in Hurricane Sandy-ravaged New Jersey will face the highest tax increase as a percentage of their income – 6.82%  or about $6,933 more in taxes — if Congress does not reach an agreement on the fiscal cliff tax issues during the lame-duck session, according to an analysis by the Tax Foundation.

In its study of how the fiscal cliff would affect typical families in each state, the Tax Foundation reports that if the numerous tax provisions that are due to expire on Dec. 31 are not changed, a four-person family in New Jersey with a median income of $101,682 will see its taxes go up at a rate 6.82 percent of its income, which translates into about $6,933.

The tax issues in question are the expiration of the Bush tax rates, which also include the elimination of the 10 percent tax bracket and the reduced deduction for married filers; ending the 2 percent cut to employee-side Social Security taxes; and the Alternative Minimum Tax.

Maryland was ranked second by the Tax Foundation because a four-person family there, with a median income of $106,707, would see its taxes go up 6.74 percent as a percentage of income, or about $7,194.

Connecticut, ranked third, would see taxes for a family of four go up by 6.62 percent, or $6,653.

All five states with the top tax increases are “blue states,” which President Obama won in the 2012 presidential election. But so are four out of the bottom five states with the exception of Kansas.

Top Five Tax Increases Tax Increases as % of Income

#1 – New Jersey $6,933                                6.82%

#2 – Maryland    $7,194                                 6.74%

#3 – Connecticut $6,653                                6.62%

#4 – Massachusetts $6,632                           6.53%

#5 – New Hampshire $5,660                          5.81%

Forty states would see tax increases between $3,000 and $3,999. Six states would see an increase between $4,000 and $4,999 and three would see increases between $6,000 and $6,999.

New Hampshire would be the only state to see a tax increase between $5,000 and $5,999 and Maryland would be the only state to see a tax increase over $7,000.

Bottom Five Tax Increases Tax Increases as % of Income

#50 – Washington $3,362                                4.12%

#49 – Hawaii    $3,453                                    4.16%

#48 – Colorado $3,646                                    4.29%

#47 – Kansas $3,227                                      4.31%

#46 – Illinois $3,417                                        4.32%

The potential for tax increases on millions of U.S. taxpayers is still possible, the Tax Foundation explains, and would be especially devastating for lower-income families because of the changes to the child tax credit; the elimination of the 10 percent bracket, which would go back to 15 percent; and the reduced standard deduction for married filers — all of which are provisions in the 2001 and 2003 Bush tax cuts.

Source: http://cnsnews.com/news/article/sandy-ravaged-new-jersey-families-face-6933-tax-hike-fiscal-cliff-stalemate

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,547 other followers

%d bloggers like this: