Home > Communism/Marxism/Socalism/Racism/FASCISM, Current Federal Legislation > Dr. Ben Carson on Second Amendment Rights: “It depends on where you live.”

Dr. Ben Carson on Second Amendment Rights: “It depends on where you live.”


‘Conservative Hero’ Ben Carson To Beck: You Have No Right To Semi-Automatic Weapons In Large Cities

by Andrew Kirell | 10:26 am, March 3rd, 2013

Appearing on Glenn Beck‘s radio show this past week, Dr. Benjamin Carson took a vastly different stance from most conservatives on the issue of gun control, claiming you shouldn’t be able to own semi-automatic weapons in large cities.

Carson became a newfound conservative hero last month when he spoke at the National Prayer Breakfast and laid out a series of criticisms of ObamaCare, political correctness, and tax policy right in front of the president himself. Many called the speech “inappropriate” given the apolitical nature of the event, but many conservatives lauded Carson for his “bold” and “sensible” suggestions for policy reform.

Asked by Beck for his thoughts on the Second Amendment, Carson gave the popular pro-gun argument: “There’s a reason for the Second Amendment; people do have the right to have weapons.”

But when asked whether people should be allowed to own “semi-automatic weapons,” the doctor replied: “It depends on where you live.”…(Con’t)

 

CONTINUE READING: http://www.mediaite.com/tv/conservative-hero-ben-carson-to-beck-you-have-no-right-to-semi-automatic-weapons-in-large-cities/

  1. Michael Clardy
    April 8, 2013 at 09:03

    I don’t care where you live, how rich or poor you are or what color your skin is. There’s no reason by the constitution that says if you live in a large city you must be limited in firearms

  2. Incredulous
    June 21, 2013 at 05:58

    He’s a smart guy. I’m sure he can be convinced that “equal protection” is not mitigated by the city you live in.

    • June 21, 2013 at 07:31

      Indeed, there are some truly “good people” who really have no clue why our Second Amendment was written. They think it’s for hunting and self defense. They need only to be informed and armed with the truth.

  3. June 21, 2013 at 07:39

    It comes down to the fact that liberals, for all their high talk, don’t trust their predominately black communities with guns, liberty, or a proper education.

    • June 21, 2013 at 08:34

      They also don’t trust THEMSELVES with such responsibilities. It’s that “shared guilt” and “shared sacrifice” they preach so much. Afraid of exposing their own guilt, they vomit it all over everyone else. The first thing they “think” of when tragedy strikes is to punish those who did not have anything to do with it. They MUST keep blacks as their personal little “victim” and “race” pawns. Too bad most blacks have no idea they’re embracing their own racist tyrants, bent on their subjugation for their own personal gain. Yes, I DETEST those beady eyed beasts. I will never forgive them for what they’re doing.

  4. June 21, 2013 at 16:26

    He has never heard of the 2nd Amendment or the Dick Act, I guess…If it’s made and you can afford it. YOU as an American can own it. So all gun control legislation is Treason and it’s reward is a rope They ALL past and present know it and before we come for them they want all our guns so we only have rocks and slingshot to use against their gestapos’ guns.

    • June 21, 2013 at 18:34

      Some of us have learned from historical facts……. as opposed to the glassy eyed obama snugglers, who’ve been so deeply brainwashed. These are not our fellow Americans. THEY ARE ENEMY INVADERS, BENT ON OUR TOTAL DESTRUCTION.

      I will treat them as such.

  5. July 17, 2013 at 14:46

    You know I like this guy, except, the whole idea, about where you live theory is the most unconstitutional argument there is…The Supreme Court ruled that people can own hand guns in Chicago, and most all handguns are semi-automatic. I just think he needs to listen to law abiding gun owners and he’d change his tune. Because leaving it up to government to decide what a large city is would be crazy…So what if you live in a county thats large, but you live in rural part of it? stuff like that won’t cut the mustard…No firerarm of anykind should be illegal, if possessed by a law abiding gunowner, a machinegun, a tank, I don’t care, if the person who owns it is a non-criminal he should be able to own it. Who knows his reasons, maybe he just collects war relics, maybe he like to shoot, it doesnt matter…Convicted Felons though shouldn’t be allowed to own a slingshot!

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: