Archive

Archive for the ‘VOTER/CENSUS FRAUD’ Category

More Voter Fraud: Nevada’s SEIU Managed Voting Machines Auto-Selecting obama

October 25, 2012 28 comments

Absurd! Nevada Voting Machine Auto-Selecting Obama

25 October 2012 / 10 Comments

 

REPORTS OF THIS TAKING PLACE IN NORTH CAROLINA, AS WELL.  FOR INFORMATION ABOUT SEIU MANAGED VOTING MACHINE SCAMS THERE,  READ HERE: https://twg2a.wordpress.com/2012/10/24/another-case-of-voting-fraud-this-time-north-carolina/

 

PolitiChicks.tv has just received confirmation that a voter in Las Vegas tried voting for Governor Mitt Romney but the machine automatically checked “Obama” multiple times instead.

Our source said:

“Yesterday I went to an early voting site at Centennial Center in Las Vegas, NV. I went with my 19 year old son who was a first-time voter. I went to an open machine and inserted my card. When the selections came up, all of the candidate pairings were listed and I touched the box for Romney/Ryan. The checkmark appeared next to President Obama’s name. I touched the check mark removing it and touched the box next to Romney’s name again. Again, the checkmark appeared next to Obama.

Read more: Politichicks.TV

Another Case Of Voting FRAUD. This Time, North Carolina

October 24, 2012 6 comments

TWG: Yet ANOTHER report of voter fraud.  Folks, PLEASE check your vote and don’t use these machines. Manually cast your vote.  The SEIU thugs working for the obama regime are the one’s tasked with “servicing” those machines.  Clearly, they cannot be trusted.

 

UPDATE: NEVADA SEIU VOTING MACHINES ALSO PROGRAMMED TO VOTE DEMOCRAT ONLY: https://twg2a.wordpress.com/2012/10/25/more-voter-fraud-nevadas-seiu-managed-voting-machines-auto-selecting-obama/

 

By Alex Thomas
theintelhub.com
October 24, 2012

Multiple residents from the third largest county in North Carolina have reported that their votes, cast on electronic voting machines, were repeatedly changed from Romney to Obama.

Residents in Guilford County began to report the problem to WGHP-TV which in turn ran a report on the irregularities that voting officials were quick to claim have been fixed.

Voter Sher Coromailis told MyFox8.com that every time she attempted to vote for Romney the machine changed her vote to Obama.

“I was so upset this could happen,” said Coromalis.

Another voter, Marie Haydock, also voiced her concern and noted how big of a deal it was for even one vote to be altered.

“The frustration is… every vote counts,” said Haydock.

County officials have claimed that the issue has been fixed, that there is no conspiracy, and that it is a problem that regularly occurs during early voting.

“It’s not a conspiracy it’s just a machine that needs to be corrected,” said Guilford County Board of Elections Director George Gilbert.

Interestingly, Michelle Obama has recently urged supporters and Americans throughout the nation to vote early, pushing forth the narrative that if you wait for voting day there is a chance of not being able to cast your vote.

Source: http://theintelhub.com/2012/10/24/voter-fraud-north-carolina-residents-select-romney-but-vote-comes-up-for-obama/

Military Voting: obama DOES NOT WANT OUR MILITARY TO VOTE

October 14, 2012 1 comment

[TWG The obama regime continues to stick it to our Veterans. Hard to believe there are so many TRAITOR Veterans still supporting this marxist regime after all they’ve done to screw them over.  ANY Veteran who supports obama is a MARXIST, a TRAITOR and a DISGRACE.]

 

States blasted for late absentee ballots

 

By Karen Jowers – Staff writer
Posted : Friday Oct 12, 2012 14:58:27 EDT

A group of key lawmakers want assurances from the Defense and Justice departments that the rights of military and overseas citizens who vote absentee will be protected in the Nov. 6 elections.

“We are concerned that, absent prompt and effective remedial action, some men and women in uniform will be deprived of the 45-day window to vote guaranteed” by the Military and Overseas Voter Empowerment Act, stated an Oct. 11 letter signed by Rep. Buck McKeon, R-Calif., chairman of the House Armed Services Committee; Rep. Daniel E. Lungren, R-Calif., chairman of the House Administration Committee; and Rep. Lamar Smith, R-Texas, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee.

Meanwhile, Justice Department officials have filed a lawsuit against the state of Vermont alleging election officials violated the law by not sending out absentee ballots soon enough for military and overseas voters — the latest in a string of complaints filed this year against states for that reason.

The lawmakers’ letter cited reports that jurisdictions in Vermont, Michigan, Mississippi and Wisconsin had failed to mail absentee ballots to service members by the Sept. 22, 2012, deadline established by the MOVE Act. That date, 45 days before the Nov. 6 elections, is designed to give military members and their family members who vote by absentee ballot — either within the U.S. or overseas — as well as U.S. citizens living overseas a reasonable time window to receive and return their ballots.

To fix the problem, the congressmen stated, these jurisdictions should extend the deadline for accepting military and overseas ballots by the same number of days as the ballots were mailed late.

“While implementation and enforcement of the MOVE Act appear on course as an improvement over the poor performance we saw in the 2010 elections, we are concerned about the currently reported shortcomings,” the congressmen wrote. “If any element of local, state or federal government does not abide by the MOVE Act, the result should not ever be the disenfranchisement of any member of the armed services.”

The congressmen asked both departments about their policies for verifying that jurisdictions have sent out ballots, and when they became aware that jurisdictions in those four states had not mailed their ballots until after Sept. 22. They also asked for information about actions to remedy the MOVE Act violations.

Enforcement of the MOVE Act is a Justice Department.

On Oct. 11, the same day the letter was sent, Justice officials filed a lawsuit against Vermont and its secretary of state, who is in charge of elections, alleging that at least 191 absentee ballots — 21 percent of the 894 absentee ballot requests received — were mailed after Sept. 22, based on reports provided by state election officials to Justice. The ballots were transmitted between Sept. 24 and Oct. 2.

Vermont held a primary election on Aug. 28, among the latest in the country, and the results were disputed, according to the Justice Department complaint filed in the U.S. District Court for Vermont. The Vermont Superior Court in Washington County ordered a recount, and the winner was declared on Sept. 18. The ballot was not finalized until Sept. 20.

Lawsuits also were filed earlier this year against Michigan and Wisconsin, alleging election officials had failed to mail absentee ballots at least 45 days before their primaries. The lawsuits required the states to closely monitor their election officials and provide reports to Justice to ensure that the ballots were sent out on time for the Nov. 6 elections.

The congressmen also asked Defense Department officials whether they have established installation voting assistance offices at every installation where they are required. It is the service branches’ responsibility to establish these offices, according to defense policy. A recent DoD Inspector General report stated the IG office was unable to contact installation voting assistance offices at almost half of all military installations.

 

Source: Air Force Times

Montana Ballots In Total Disarray. Thanks, Linda McCulloch.


[TWG Note: Imagine that…  We know our Montana Secretary of State, Linda McCulloch, was up to no good when she and her grunts pushed so hard for the fraud-filled, mail-in voting schemes.  It’s like watching the snake guard the mouse cage.   Montanans need to vote her (and her little grunts too)  off her big, fat, throne.]

From the diaries by Erick . . .

In at least two counties in Montana, the home of a competitive U.S. Senate race that could tip the balance of power in the upper chamber, massive mail-in absentee ballot irregularities have been uncovered by Media Trackers Montana, a non-partisan investigative research organization with operations in five states across the country.  In Broadwater county alone, where Sen. Jon Tester received only 35 percent of the vote in the 2006 general election, up to 600 erroneous mail-in ballots have been reported. Over a dozen Billings-area voters have complained that they received incorrect ballots.  Yellowstone county officials have also reported numerous complaints from voters receiving the wrong ballot.

And to top it all off, even a sample ballot available to individual voters on the Montana Secretary of State’s website is incorrect (this particular ballot allows the voter to select a state representative in two separate districts — districts 68 and 83).  A majority of Montana voters are expected to vote by mail this November.

The Media Trackers investigation found state political officials in total disarray.  One county elections supervisor gave Media Trackers Montana several conflicting reasons for the ballot snafu.  Broadwater County elections officer Rhonda Nelson, a Democrat, told Media Trackers that the county experienced a “computer glitch with the software vendor” which resulted in numerous ballot anomalies. But when pressed for more specificity, Nelson seemed to contradict herself, stating, “This happened because I was in the hospital the day the ballots were approved and while my deputy was watching things, it was one less set of eyes on the process.”  Despite the widespread and significant ballot problems, Nelson told Media Trackers that she was confident in the integrity of the mail-in ballot system and that she planned to “personally call everyone who received a bad ballot and let them know they will be getting correct ballots.”

Scott Aspenlieder, a Republican seeking to unseat current Secretary of State Linda McCulloch, a Democrat, issued a scathing press release after Media Trackers first reported the ballot irregularities.  “I call on our Secretary of State to begin a comprehensive audit of all of the 2012 absentee ballots to identify every single error, and immediately take steps to fix this process so a Montanan’s right to vote is never threatened again,” he wrote.  “This failure of leadership is simply unacceptable, and Montanans deserve better.”

Montana’s primary is scheduled for Tuesday, June 5.  Follow Media Trackers Montana on Facebook and Twitter to receive breaking updates on this developing story.

 

Source: http://www.redstate.com/smdavis/2012/05/17/media-trackers-uncovers-massive-ballot-irregularities-in-montana/

Soros-obama Linked Foreign Group Counting Our Votes For The 2012 “Election”?


“You know, comrades,” says Stalin, “that I think in regard to this: I consider it completely unimportant who in the party will vote, or how; but what is extraordinarily important is this — who will count the votes, and how.”

 

In January 2012 a [then] quiet deal was struck between SOE Software (then the leading US vote tabulation company.  Scytl is said to be strongly linked to George Soros.  The Obama syndicate members arranged the deal and Obama’s now wholly-owned rubber-stamp Congress agreed to it.  That’s right.  A foreign company may now, ostensibly and unconstitutionally, determine who wins US “elections.”  Of extreme interest, Scytl’s CEO, Pere Valles, was the former VP and CFO of GlobalNet whose headquarters were based in Obama’s then base of operations Chicago.  Although apparently scrubbed from Obama’s donor list (as so many negative and potentially negative-to-Obama documents and videos have been), Valles is said to have contributed heavily to Obama’s first presidential run…(Con’t)

 

CONTINUE READING: http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/45948#.T4hIvmLO-ig.twitter

Justice Department Voter ID opposition glaringly inconsistent with gun stance


March 12, 2012
David Codrea, Gun Rights Examiner
“The Justice Department’s civil rights division on Monday objected to a new photo ID requirement for voters in Texas because many Hispanic voters lack state-issued identification,” …

Read more ►

Voter ID Terrifies DemocRATS…

January 2, 2012 2 comments

[TWG Note: We ABSOLUTELY MUST have voter fraud units set up in each city/voting location across this country this time.  We SAW what they got away with obama’s annointment, and this year will be even worse.  The obama regime has been busy laying the tracks for their minions since he usurped out White House in 2009, and AG holder is on an all-out attack to allow his boss another term to finish this country off for good.  They cannot win this election unless they get their illegal aliens’ vote, and they are pulling out the stops this time. They know that most Americans won’t tolerate them another term and will vote for someone else.  Allowing those SOB’s to steal the most important election of our lifetimes is not an option.   The TEA Parties need to rally their groups and build their teams to watch every move these cheats, liars and thieves make.   START BUILDING YOUR VOTER FRAUD UNITS NOW, PATRIOTS!]

As their pal Stalin said…..

Those who count the votes determine the outcome.

This column by ACRU Senior Fellow Robert Knight was published January 2, 2012 in The Washington Times.

The most consequential election in our lifetime is still 10 months away, but it’s clear from the Obama administration’s order halting South Carolina’s new photo ID law that the Democrats already have brought a gun to a knife fight.

How else to describe this naked assault on the right of a state to create minimal requirements to curb voter fraud?

On Dec. 23, Assistant Attorney General Thomas E. Perez sent a letter ordering South Carolina to stop enforcing its photo ID law. Mr. Perez, who heads the Civil Rights Division that booted charges against the New Black Panther Party for intimidating voters in Philadelphia in 2008, said South Carolina’s law would disenfranchise thousands of minority voters.

South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson rejected Mr. Perez’s math and explained on Fox News why the law is necessary. The state Department of Motor Vehicles audited a state Election Commission report that said 239,333 people were registered to vote but had no photo ID. The DMV found that 37,000 were deceased, more than 90,000 had moved to other states, and others had names not matched to IDs. That left only 27,000 people registered without a photo ID but who could vote by signing an affidavit as to their identity.

Mr. Wilson told me by phone Thursday that he would file a challenge to the order in federal district court in January. Asked whether he felt South Carolina was being singled out, he declined to speculate on motives. However, citing the National Labor Relations Board’s order to invalidate the voter-approved union card check amendment, the NLRB’s order to stop a new Boeing Co. plant, and the Justice Department’s suit to halt the state’s immigration law, he said, “There certainly is a pattern of the federal government overreaching into South Carolina.”

Leading Democrats loudly equate recently enacted photo ID legislation as updated versions of Jim Crow laws that once robbed people of their constitutional right to vote simply because of their race. But photo ID laws and other voter integrity measures cover everyone. Like other states, South Carolina provides photo IDs if a person cannot afford one.

The U.S. Constitution empowers the states to enact voting procedures with minimal input from the national government, such as setting the voting age and election days for federal offices. The 15th and 19th amendments ensure that no one is denied the right to vote based on race or sex.

In 1965, Congress passed the Voting Rights Act, which authorizes the U.S. attorney general or a three-judge panel of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia to review changes to voting procedures or redistricting in nine states (Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, Texas and Virginia), some counties in California, Florida, New York, North Carolina and South Dakota, and some townships in Michigan and New Hampshire.

Congress did so to counter clearly established patterns of voter intimidation of blacks. Now, the Justice Department, which, under Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. could be renamed the Retribution Department, looks the other way depending on the race of the parties involved.

In 2008, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld Indiana’s 2005 photo ID law, which the Democratic Party and several interest groups had challenged as a “severe burden.”

But, as American Civil Rights Union attorney Peter Ferrara noted in the group’s friend- of-the-court brief:

“No one has been denied the right to vote by the Indiana Voter ID Law. The record clearly establishes without challenge that 99 percent of the Voting Age Population in Indiana already has the required ID, in the form of driver’s licenses, passports, or other identification. Of the remaining 1 percent, senior citizens and the disabled are automatically eligible to vote by absentee ballot, and such absentee voting is exempt from the Voter ID Law.”

Does that sound “severe” to you?As Mr. Ferrara notes, “the slight burden of additional paperwork for a fraction of 1 percent, to show who they are and thereby prove their eligibility to vote, cannot come close to outweighing the interests of all legitimate legal voters in maintaining their effective vote.”

A bipartisan Commission on Federal Election Reform in 2005 chaired by former President Jimmy Carter and former U.S. Secretary of State James A. Baker III found no evidence that requiring photo IDs would suppress the minority vote. The panel recommended a national photo ID system and a campaign to register voters.

In a 2008 column, Mr. Carter and Mr. Baker cited a study by American University’s Center for Democracy and Election Management that echoed the election commission. Among other things, researchers found that in three states – Indiana, Mississippi and Maryland – about 1.2 percent of registered voters had no photo ID.

Since the GOP took a majority of governorships and legislatures in 2010 and continued enacting voting safeguards, you can feel the panic in Democratic strongholds.

The Obama administration is playing the same race card that Democrats have played for decades. But this is not about race; it’s about whether legitimately cast votes will be wiped out by illegally cast votes.

In Chicago, a federal investigation of the 1982 gubernatorial election estimated that at least 100,000 illegal votes had been cast and that voter fraud had been routine for many years. In 1960, Mayor Richard J. Daley’s Chicago Democrat machine almost certainly sealed John F. Kennedy’s presidential election by delaying reporting by Democratic-controlled precincts and counting them for Kennedy.

Vice President Richard M. Nixon, the Republican candidate, had a compelling case for a challenge, but chose not to do so. The media would have crucified him as a sore loser without seriously investigating fraud allegations.

Conversely, in 2000, when Democrat Al Gore challenged George W. Bush’s razor-thin victory in Florida, the media flogged Florida Secretary of State Katherine Harris because she refused to overlook “hanging chads” and other questionable vote counting.

The stakes are enormous, and the Obama administration is quite aware of the danger posed by an aroused electorate on a level playing field.

With the economy in a ditch, their only hope of stemming the conservative tide might be to rig the returns, especially where political machines still prevail.

%d bloggers like this: