Archive

Posts Tagged ‘birth control’

Who Is Margaret Sanger and What Is Planned Parenthood?

October 29, 2012 Leave a comment

TWG: These are the vermin that the leftist DIMS are advocating for these days.  Hard to believe this group of racist genocidal maniacs have any credibility or that they still exist today.  We can thank the so-called “educators” for hiding the truth about these monsters.  DIMS are proud of their alliance with this racist, genocidal chain of baby slaughterers.

“WE DO NOT WANT WORD TO GET OUT THAT WE WANT TO EXTERMINATE THE NEGRO POPULATION.”  ~Margaret Sanger, Founder Planned Parenthood

On blacks, immigrants and indigents:
“…human weeds,’ ‘reckless breeders,’ ‘spawning… human beings who never should have been born.”  ~Margaret Sanger,
Pivot of Civilization, referring to immigrants and poor people

 

 

The Truth About MARGRET SANGER

(This article first appeared in the January 20, 1992 edition of Citizen magazine)

How Planned Parenthood Duped America

At a March 1925 international birth control gathering in New York City, a speaker warned of the menace posed by the “black” and “yellow” peril. The man was not a Nazi or Klansman; he was Dr. S. Adolphus Knopf, a member of Margaret Sanger’s American Birth Control League (ABCL), which along with other groups eventually became known as Planned Parenthood.

Sanger’s other colleagues included avowed and sophisticated racists. One, Lothrop Stoddard, was a Harvard graduate and the author of The Rising Tide of Color against White Supremacy. Stoddard was something of a Nazi enthusiast who described the eugenic practices of the Third Reich as “scientific” and “humanitarian.” And Dr. Harry Laughlin, another Sanger associate and board member for her group, spoke of purifying America’s human “breeding stock” and purging America’s “bad strains.” These “strains” included the “shiftless, ignorant, and worthless class of antisocial whites of the South.”

Not to be outdone by her followers, Margaret Sanger spoke of sterilizing those she designated as “unfit,” a plan she said would be the “salvation of American civilization.: And she also spike of those who were “irresponsible and reckless,” among whom she included those ” whose religious scruples prevent their exercising control over their numbers.” She further contended that “there is no doubt in the minds of all thinking people that the procreation of this group should be stopped.” That many Americans of African origin constituted a segment of Sanger considered “unfit” cannot be easily refuted.

While Planned Parenthood’s current apologists try to place some distance between the eugenics and birth control movements, history definitively says otherwise. The eugenic theme figured prominently in the Birth Control Review, which Sanger founded in 1917. She published such articles as “Some Moral Aspects of Eugenics” (June 1920), “The Eugenic Conscience” (February 1921), “The purpose of Eugenics” (December 1924), “Birth Control and Positive Eugenics” (July 1925), “Birth Control: The True Eugenics” (August 1928), and many others.

These eugenic and racial origins are hardly what most people associate with the modern Planned Parenthood Federation of America (PPFA), which gave its Margaret Sanger award to the late Dr. Martin Luther King in 1966, and whose current president, Faye Wattleton, is black, a former nurse, and attractive.

Though once a social pariah group, routinely castigated by religious and government leaders, the PPFA is now an established, high-profile, well-funded organization with ample organizational and ideological support in high places of American society and government. Its statistics are accepted by major media and public health officials as “gospel”; its full-page ads appear in major newspapers; its spokespeople are called upon to give authoritative analyses of what America’s family policies should be and to prescribe official answers that congressmen, state legislator and Supreme Court justiices all accept as “social orthodoxy.”

Blaming Families

Sanger’s obsession with eugenics can be traced back to her own family. One of 11 children, she wrote in the autobiographical book, My Fight for Birth Control, that “I associated poverty, toil, unemployment, drunkenness, cruelty, quarreling, fighting, debts, jails with large families.” Just as important was the impression in her childhood of an inferior family status, exacerbated by the iconoclastic, “free-thinking” views of her father, whose “anti-Catholic attitudes did not make for his popularity” in a predominantly Irish community.

The fact that the wealthy families in her hometown of Corning, N.Y., had relatively few children, Sanger took as prima facie evidence of the impoverishing effect of larger families. The personal impact of this belief was heightened 1899, at the age of 48. Sanger was convinced that the “ordeals of motherhood” had caused the death of her mother. The lingering consumption (tuberculosis) that took her mother’s life visited Sanger at the birth of her own first child on Nov. 18, 1905. The diagnosis forced her to seek refuge in the Adirondacks to strengthen her for the impending birth. Despite the precautions, the birth of baby Grant was “agonizing,” the mere memory of which Sanger described as “mental torture” more than 25 years later. She once described the experience as a factor “to be reckoned with” in her zealous campaign for birth control.

From the beginning, Sanger advocacy of sex education reflected her interest in population control and birth prevention among the “unfit.” Her first handbook, published for adolescents in 1915 and entitled, What Every Boy and Girl Should Know, featured a jarring afterword:

It is a vicious cycle; ignorance breeds poverty and poverty breeds ignorance. There is only one cure for both, and that is to stoop breeding these things. Stop bringing to birth children whose inheritance cannot be one of health or intelligence. Stop bringing into the world children whose parents cannot provide for them.

To Sanger, the ebbing away of moral and religious codes over sexual conduct was a natural consequence of the worthlessness of such codes in the individual’s search for self-fulfillment. “Instead of laying down hard and fast rules of sexual conduct,” Sanger wrote in her 1922 book Pivot of Civilization, “sex can be rendered effective and valuable only as it meets and satisfies the interests and demands of the pupil himself.” Her attitude is appropriately described as libertinism, but sex knowledge was not the same as individual liberty, as her writings on procreation emphasized.

The second edition of Sanger’s life story, An Autobiography, appeared in 1938. There Sanger described her first cross-country lecture tour in 1916. Her standard speech asserted seven conditions of life that “mandated” the use of birth control: the third was “when parents, though normal, had subnormal children”; the fourth, “when husband and wife were adolescent”; the fifth, “when the earning capacity of the father was inadequate.” No right existed to exercise sex knowledge to advance procreation. Sanger described the fact that “anyone, no matter how ignorant, how diseased mentally or physically, how lacking in all knowledge of children, seemed to consider he or she had the right to become a parent.”

 

CONTINUE READING:  http://www.blackgenocide.org/sanger.html

“Planned Parenthood”…. The Genocidal Racists So Widely Supported By The Racist Leftists….

April 6, 2012 4 comments

 

If you support “planned parenthood”, you ARE supporting genocidal racism and murder.   No ifs, ands or buts.

 

Margaret Sanger
Founder of Planned Parenthood

Editor of The Birth Control Review from 1917 to 1938.

Founder of Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion chain in the world.

Her goal in life:
Sanger admitted her entire life’s purpose was to promote birth control. An Autobiography, p. 194

Helped to establish the research bureau that financed “the pill,” she contributed toward the work of the German doctor who developed the IUD. “Ernst Graefenberg and His Ring,” Mt. Sinai Journal of Medicine, July-Aug. 1975, p. 345, in Margaret Sanger: Father of Modern Society, by Elasah Drogin

Sanger espoused the thinking of eugenicists — similar to Darwin’s “survival of the fittest” — but related the concept to human society, saying the genetic makeup of the poor, and minorities, for example, was inferior. Pivot of Civilization, by Margaret Sanger, 1922, p. 80

On mandatory sterilization of the poor:
One of Sanger’s greatest influences, sexologist/eugenicist Dr. Havelock Ellis (with whom she had an affair, leading to her divorce from her first husband), urged mandatory sterilization of the poor as a prerequisite to receiving any public aid. The Problem of Race Regeneration, by Havelock Ellis, p. 65, in Margaret Sanger: Father of Modern Society, p. 18. Ellis believed that any sex was acceptable, as long as it hurt no one. The Sage of Sex, A Life of Havelock Ellis, by Arthur Calder-Marshall, p. 88

On eradicating ‘bad stocks’:
The goal of eugenicists is “to prevent the multiplication of bad stocks,” wrote Dr. Ernst Rudin in the April 1933 Birth Control Review (of which Sanger was editor). Another article exhorted Americans to “restrict the propagation of those physically, mentally and socially inadequate.”

Sanger featured in Life magazine, 1937, “Margaret Sanger celebrates Birth Control Victory.”

In Her Own Words
“The most merciful thing that a large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.”
Margaret Sanger, Women and the New Race
(Eugenics Publ. Co., 1920, 1923)
Margaret Sanger (1883-1966)
On blacks, immigrants and indigents:
“…human weeds,’ ‘reckless breeders,’ ‘spawning… human beings who never should have been born.”  Margaret Sanger, Pivot of Civilization, referring to immigrants and poor people
On sterilization & racial purification:
Sanger believed that, for the purpose of racial “purification,” couples should be rewarded who chose sterilization. Birth Control in America, The Career of Margaret Sanger, by David Kennedy, p. 117, quoting a 1923 Sanger speech.

On the right of married couples to bear children:
Couples should be required to submit applications to have a child, she wrote in her “Plan for Peace.” Birth Control Review, April 1932

On the purpose of birth control:
The purpose in promoting birth control was “to create a race of thoroughbreds,” she wrote in the Birth Control Review, Nov. 1921 (p. 2)

On the rights of the handicapped and mentally ill, and racial minorities:
“More children from the fit, less from the unfit — that is the chief aim of birth control.” Birth Control Review, May 1919, p. 12

On religious convictions regarding sex outside of marriage:
“This book aims to answer the needs expressed in thousands on thousands of letters to me in the solution of marriage problems… Knowledge of sex truths frankly and plainly presented cannot possibly injure healthy, normal, young minds. Concealment, suppression, futile attempts to veil the unveilable – these work injury, as they seldom succeed and only render those who indulge in them ridiculous. For myself, I have full confidence in the cleanliness, the open-mindedness, the promise of the younger generation.” Margaret Sanger, Happiness in Marriage (Bretano’s, New York, 1927)

On the extermination of blacks:
“We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population,” she said, “if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.” Woman’s Body, Woman’s Right: A Social History of Birth Control in America, by Linda Gordon

On respecting the rights of the mentally ill:
In her “Plan for Peace,” Sanger outlined her strategy for eradication of those she deemed “feebleminded.” Among the steps included in her evil scheme were immigration restrictions; compulsory sterilization; segregation to a lifetime of farm work; etc. Birth Control Review, April 1932, p. 107

On adultery:
A woman’s physical satisfaction was more important than any marriage vow, Sanger believed. Birth Control in America, p. 11

On marital sex:
“The marriage bed is the most degenerating influence in the social order,” Sanger said. (p. 23) [Quite the opposite of God’s view on the matter: “Marriage is honorable in all, and the bed undefiled; but whoremongers and adulterers God will judge.” (Hebrews 13:4)

On abortion:
“Criminal’ abortions arise from a perverted sex relationship under the stress of economic necessity, and their greatest frequency is among married women.” The Woman Rebel – No Gods, No Masters, May 1914, Vol. 1, No. 3.

On the YMCA and YWCA:
“…brothels of the Spirit and morgues of Freedom!”), The Woman Rebel – No Gods, No Masters, May 1914, Vol. 1, No. 3.

On the Catholic Church’s view of contraception:
“…enforce SUBJUGATION by TURNING WOMAN INTO A MERE INCUBATOR.” The Woman Rebel – No Gods, No Masters, May 1914, Vol. 1, No. 3.

On motherhood:
“I cannot refrain from saying that women must come to recognize there is some function of womanhood other than being a child-bearing machine.” What Every Girl Should Know, by Margaret Sanger (Max Maisel, Publisher, 1915)
“The most merciful thing that a large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.” Margaret Sanger, Women and the New Race (Eugenics Publ. Co., 1920, 1923)
 Editor of The Birth Control Review from 1917 to 1938.
Founder of Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion provider in the world.

Her goal in life:
Sanger admitted her entire life’s purpose was to promote birth control. An Autobiography, p. 194

Helped to establish the research bureau that financed “the pill,” she contributed toward the work of the German doctor who developed the IUD. “Ernst Graefenberg and His Ring,” Mt. Sinai Journal of Medicine, July-Aug. 1975, p. 345, in Margaret Sanger: Father of Modern Society, by Elasah Drogin

Sanger espoused the thinking of eugenicists — similar to Darwin’s “survival of the fittest” — but related the concept to human society, saying the genetic makeup of the poor, and minorities, for example, was inferior. Pivot of Civilization, by Margaret Sanger, 1922, p. 80

On mandatory sterilization of the poor:
One of Sanger’s greatest influences, sexologist/eugenicist Dr. Havelock Ellis (with whom she had an affair, leading to her divorce from her first husband), urged mandatory sterilization of the poor as a prerequisite to receiving any public aid. The Problem of Race Regeneration, by Havelock Ellis, p. 65, in Margaret Sanger: Father of Modern Society, p. 18. Ellis believed that any sex was acceptable, as long as it hurt no one. The Sage of Sex, A Life of Havelock Ellis, by Arthur Calder-Marshall, p. 88

On eradicating ‘bad stocks’:
The goal of eugenicists is “to prevent the multiplication of bad stocks,” wrote Dr. Ernst Rudin in the April 1933 Birth Control Review (of which Sanger was editor). Another article exhorted Americans to “restrict the propagation of those physically, mentally and socially inadequate.”

Sanger featured in Life magazine, 1937, “Margaret Sanger celebrates Birth Control Victory.” 
 
PLANNED PARENTHOOD TODAY

“We are not going to be an organization promoting celibacy or chastity.”
Faye Wattleton, President,  Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Los Angeles Times, Oct. 17, 1986
_______

“If your parents are stupid enough to deny you access to birth control, and you are under 18, you can get it on your own. Call Planned Parenthood.” 
Planned Parenthood advertisement, Dallas Observer, Jan. 30, 1986 
_______

“There are only 2 basic kinds of sex: sex with victims and sex without. Sex with victims is always wrong. Sex without is ALWAYS right.”
You’ve Changed The Combination, Rocky Mountain Planned Parenthood, Denver, Colo.
_______

“The question of whether or not to sell ourselves to men is a false one: The real question is how to sell ourselves in the way that is least destructive to ourselves and our sisters. Prostitutes don’t need our condescension. What they need is our alliance. And we need theirs.”
The New Our Bodies, Ourselves, Boston Women’s Health Collective, p 113 
_______

“Sex is too important to glop up with sentiment. If you feel sexy, for heaven’s sake admit it to yourself. If the feeling and the tension bother you, you can masturbate. Masturbation cannot hurt you and it will make you feel more relaxed.”
The Perils of Puberty, Rocky Mountain Planned Parenthood, Denver, Colo. 
______

“At Planned Parenthood you can also get birth control without the consent or knowledge of your parents. So, if you are 14, 15 or 16 and you come to Planned Parenthood, we won’t tell your parents you’ve been there. We swear we won’t tell your parents.”
Planned Parenthood employee lecturing students of Ramona High School, Riverside, Calif., April 21-22, 1986

_________

FACTS on Planned Parenthood

Planned Parenthood on Adoption:
Of 6,000 clinic visit records examined from a Texas PP clinic, only 3 referred for adoption. (Aborting Planned Parenthood, by Robert H. Ruff, New Vision Press, 1988)

Planned Parenthood’s on Homosexuality & Marital Rights:
PP has encouraged homosexuality and advocated compulsory sterilization of all who have two children. (Family Planning Perspectives (a PP publication), June, Oct. 1970) 
______________

Planned Parenthood’s Goal:
Dr. Lena Levine in 1953, concerning Planned Parenthood’s purpose and planned course of action: “… to be ready as educators and parents to help young people obtain sex satisfaction before marriage. By sanctioning sex before marriage we will prevent fear and guilt. We must also relieve those who have these … feelings, and we must be ready to provide young boys and girls with the best contraceptive measures available so they will have the necessary means to achieve sexual satisfaction without having to risk possible pregnancy.” (Planned Parenthood News, Summer 1953)  .” (“Psycho-Sexual Development,” quoted in Planned Parenthood News, Summer 1953, pg. 10)

     ________

 Planned Parenthood on Pregnancy:
PP has an unhealthy concept of pregnancy, as it views the state of gestation as an abnormal condition or disease. Speaking for the organization, Dr. Warren Hern refers to human pregnancy as “an episodic, moderately extended chronic condition … May be defined as an illness … Treated by evacuation of the uterine contents…”(“Is Pregnancy Really Normal?” Family Planning Perspective, Planned Parenthood, vol. 3, No. 1, Jan. 1971, pg. 9)

Some Advice, and Calculations, for Sandra Fluke

April 4, 2012 6 comments

(Hat tip Don B. For The Forward.  Thanks Don.)

Sandra Fluke's 10:00am Trash Run. Next run, 12:00 noon. Bring Bulldozer.

Many of you have likely seen the heart rending testimony of Ms. Sandra
Fluke, a law student at Georgetown University, before a Congressional
Committee recently. She was lamenting that no one would subsidize her
birth control expenses, which she claimed would amount to $3000 during
her three years in law school. After watching Ms. Fluke describe her
desperate situation I set to thinking of ways to help her out of her
crisis.

First, of course I had to pass through the grieving period I
experienced after hearing of her inhumane treatment at the hands of
the Georgetown administration and our Government – what cruelty lurks
in the heart of men that they would leave this poor woman to fend for
herself when all she wanted to do was get laid seven times a day (see
my analysis below).

Once I recovered from my grief, I set to thinking about ways to help
this poor girl. Being a Physicist, I sat down with my calculator and
worked through some numbers. Ms. Fluke’s expense account for birth
control (aka sexual entertainment) was claimed to be $3000 for three
years at law school. Let’s presume that as an educated woman she wants
to be doubly safe and uses both birth control pills to prevent
pregnancy and condoms to prevent STDs (sexually transmitted disease).

Using the Wal-Mart cost for birth control pills of $9 per month, her
birth control pills will cost her $324 for her entire law school
career (if you can call it a career – I can think of other names).
This leaves only $2676 for her condoms.

I went to Amazon.com, and found quality condoms available for 33 cents
each in packages of 60 condoms each. This cost includes tax and
shipping. Since she has $2676 for her 33 cent condoms, she will be
buying 8109 condoms during her law school “career”.

To use her 8109 condoms (remember, $3000 was Ms. Flukes’ own number)
she would have to have sex 7 times a day. This number presumes that
she has sex ten times a day on Sundays when she has more free time So,
having worked through these numbers, I have some suggestions for Ms.
Fluke to help her work through her crisis:

1. Find dates who are gentlemanly enough to either provide their own
condoms, or at least split the cost with her. Selection criteria is
the key to this one.

2. Spend more time studying. Even seven “quickies” a day will
seriously cut into quality study time. This would not only save money
but would improve her education as well.

3. Seek funding from the EPA from one of their Wetlands Protection
programs – surely Ms. Flukes’ nether regions would qualify as wetlands
given sex seven times a day.

Just trying to help out a starving student. By the way, the average
starting salary of new Georgetown Law School graduates is $160,000 a
year, FYI.

Booth R. Myers, PhD

So-Called “Schools” Handing Out Free Birth Control To CHILDREN.

February 9, 2012 1 comment

[TWG Note: This is the kind of crap that makes my blood boil.  WHY are parents allowing this to happen? WHY aren’t parents filing charges against those so-called “teachers”, “professors” and “education” officials?  WHY are parents throwing their children at the mercy of a group of pedophiles and homosexuals like Czar Kevin Jennings, who hands out FISTING KITS and books on deviant sexual practices to third grade CHILDREN?  Allowing SECOND GRADE CHILDREN TO ENGAGE IN SEX IN THE CLASSROOM WHILE THE PEDOPHILE “TEACHER” WATCHES.. Every last one of them need to be tried, convicted and PUNISHED ACCORDINGLY for their crimes against our children and our society. This is just SICKENING. 

 

HOMOSEXUAL PEDOPHILES ARE  BRAINWASHING YOUR CHILDREN.

Fistgate: Barack Obama’s Safe Schools Czar’s 2000 Conference Promoted ‘Fisting’ to 14 Year-Olds

Fistgate II: High School Students Given ‘Fisting Kits’ At Kevin Jennings’ 2001 GLSEN Conference

Fistgate III: Obama’s Safe Schools Czar’s ‘Black Book’ For Kids Included Tips on Fisting and Pi$$ing on Your Partner

Fistgate IV: Obama’s Safe Schools Czar Passed Out Gay Bar Guides to Teens at GLSEN Events

Fistgate V: Youth Fisting Instructor Claims Kevin Jennings Knew About Class Content in Advance

Fistgate VI: Obama’s Safe Schools Czar’s Teen Conference Literature Pushed Anal S*x in Parks With Strangers

Media Matters Defends Kid Fisting Lectures and Children Sex Books as Non-Scandal

Merry Fist-mas Media Matters… No, We’re Not Finished Yet

Fistgate VII: Explosive… After Years of Silence Massachusetts Teacher Speaks Out About What She Saw at Fistgate (Audio)

Media Matters Responds To Fistgate VII: “Shame On Kevin Jennings And GLSEN”

Fistgate VIII: Safe School’s Czar Jennings’ Org Promoted Book Detailing Gay Sex Between First Graders

Fistgate IX: Kevin Jennings’ Suggested Reading Included Porn Books for Kids With Images of Men Having Sex While Boy Scouts Watch; Media Silent

12 National Orgs Co-Sign Letter to Congress; Demand Kevin Jennings Be Fired

Fistgate X: Kevin Jennings’ Suggested Reading For Kids Included Sick Book That Romanticized Rape of a 13 Year-Old – Media Silent

Fistgate XI: Kevin Jennings’ Suggested Reading For Kids Included Sick Book that Promoted S&M to Children- Media Silent

Fistgate XII: Obama’s Safe Schools Czar’s GLSEN Conferences Included D*ld* Tips and Needle Instructions For Teens

Fistgate XIII: Safe Schools Czar Jennings ‘Recommended’ Book Describing Sex Between 1st Graders

Fistgate XIV: Jennings Personally Pushed Books That Encouraged Children to Meet Adults at Gay Bars For Sex

Democrats Push HR 4530, a Radical [HOMOSEXUAL PEDOPHILE] Safe Schools Czar’s Dream Come True

Upward Bound Is Down… Radical Sexual Indoctrination of Kids Is In

Alright, enough of my rant for today.  Sure wish PARENTS would actually DO SOMETHING about this mess.  But they won’t, because it’s quite apparent they don’t give a DAMN.]

 

Kids, Schools, and Sex: Government Taking Over for Parents

By Nathan Harden

February 8, 2012 10:58 AM EST

Last month, the school system in New London, Conn., announced it would start distributing free birth control pills to high school girls. It’s another example of the government inserting itself into the private life of kids in order to do the work parents ought to be doing.

 

Imagine a girl of 14 walking into her school health clinic, without her parents accompanying her, to pick up a pack of pills. Parents in New London have to sign a general waiver for their kids to use the school health clinic. But does that mean that parents who sign are actually aware that the school will be giving the pill to their kids? Shouldn’t the sex lives of kids who’ve barely reached puberty be subject to the direct guidance of parents?

Not everyone agrees. “I think it’s a great idea because it’s better safe than sorry,” said one New London parent in regard to the school’s pill and condom distribution program. “With all the diseases going around it’s better safe than sorry.”

Advocates of this sort of thing say it’s all for the good of the children. But I say there is something wrong about outsourcing such parental responsibilities to the government.

Why stop at simply giving them the pill? Isn’t there more the government could do? Why not reserve some rooms in the school itself for safe, government-monitored sexual activity? Stock the rooms with cheap cologne, vibrating beds, and piles and piles of pills and condoms. A school health official should be posted at every bedside to monitor safe sex practices, and to be sure those 14-year-old girls aren’t so distracted by the Hannah Montana and Twilight soundtracks piping in on their iPods that they forget to take their morning-after pills on the way out the door.

There seems to be no such thing as invasion of privacy, or violation of parental authority, whenever government bureaucrats take it upon themselves to manage kids’ sexual health.

Over in England, prurient officials are even bolder. A few years ago, the British government sent out a memo to numerous cities, asking them to step up birth control efforts among teenagers. As a result, last year, more than 1,700 schoolgirls aged 13 and 14 were administered surgery to implant a hormone-releasing contraceptive device. Best of all, not one parent was notified. Not one parent gave consent for these surgeries.

All around the world, seemingly, officials who believe they know how better to raise your kids than you do stand at the ready, with a pill to hand out and a surgery to perform on your daughter. Never mind the emotional repercussions of sex at 13. Never mind the special role parents are supposed to have in providing moral guidance, or the right they ought to have to make healthcare decisions for their children. Increasingly, in these times, the government claims the right to make such decisions.

Is any government official worthy of such responsibility? Ask the parents at Miramonte elementary school in Los Angeles. The entire staff was replaced this week after two male teachers were charged with sexually preying on young students. Complaints of sexual misconduct related to one of the two men go back more than twenty years. Students who reported the teachers’ actions were allegedly told by school officials not to “invent stories.”

Incredibly, one girl, after being victimized and filing complaints with the school, was transferred from one predator’s classroom to the other. When these kids go on to middle school and high school, these same negligent officials will undoubtedly be waiting with a pocket full of pills, or maybe even offers of free contraceptive surgery without parental notification.

“My trust level is at zero,” said the mother of a third-grader at Miramonte.

When it comes to making sex-related decisions for our kids, zero is more trust than the government deserves.

Nathan Harden is editor of The College Fix. He writes about culture and politics every Wednesday for the International Business Times. Follow him on Twitter @nathanharden

%d bloggers like this: