Posts Tagged ‘dianne feinstein’

Fascist feinstein: “I AM NOT A SIXTH GRADER!”

March 14, 2013 1 comment



TWG: Put that fascist bitch out to pasture already.  Preferably in handcuffs.

Thursday, March 14, 2013

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) chewed out freshman Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) during a contentious Senate Judiciary Committee session on a bill to ban assault-style weapons.

The bill eventually cleared the Committee on a party-line 10-8 vote. It now heads to the full Senate, where it is likely to be defeated.

The session became heated when Cruz — who opposes the assault-weapons ban — questioned Feinstein on its constitutionality, comparing it to placing limits on the First Amendment or Fourth Amendment rights.

“Would she consider it constitutional for Congress to specify that the First Amendment shall apply only to the following books and shall not apply to the books that Congress has deemed outside the protection of the Bill of Rights?” Cruz said, speaking to Feinstein.

“Likewise, would she think that the Fourth Amendment’s protection against searches and seizures, could properly apply only to the following specified individuals, and not to the individuals that Congress has deemed outside the protection of the law?”

Pointing her finger and glaring at Cruz, Feinstein shot back.

“One, I’m not a sixth grader,” Feinstein said. “Senator, I’ve been on this Committee for 20 years. I was a mayor for nine years. I walked in and I saw people shot with these weapons.

“I’m not a lawyer,” she added, “but after 20 years, I’ve been up close and personal with the Constitution. I have great respect for it. … So I, you know, it’s fine you want to lecture me on the Constitution. I appreciate it. Just know I’ve been here for a long time.”

“I thank you for the lecture. Incidentally, this does not prohibit — you used the word ‘prohibit’ – it exempts 2,271 weapons. Isn’t that enough for the people of the United States? Do they need a bazooka? Do they need other high-powered weapons that other people use in close combat? I don’t think so.”

Here’s video of the exchange:

Play video


Fascist feinstein: “Veterans shouldn’t have ‘assault weapons’ …

March 7, 2013 4 comments

“Veterans shouldn’t have ‘assault weapons’ because of this new thing called PTSD coming out of the Iraq war” ~Dianne Feinstein, FASCIST GUN GRABBER


TWG: I’ve been SCREAMING about this scheme, with nary a whimper from ANYONE else.  The Veterans causes have been infiltrated and overthrown by lefties. They’re pretending to care so they can label them with PTSD, drug them up with government big pharma drugs, and DISARM THEM. 

This once great Nation is chock full of brain-dead imbeciles today.  I wonder who, IF ANYONE, will ever see this diabolical scheme for what it IS.


Fascist feinstein’s Attempted Gun Grab Causes Commotion In CA Judiciary Committee

February 28, 2013 2 comments



During a scheduled hearing today of the Senate Judiciary Committee, senators clashed over the proposal of U.S. Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., that would ban hundreds of types of firearms, including the popular AR-15 rifle and semiautomatic handguns.

The bill would also ban magazines that hold more than 10 rounds of ammunition.

The Democrat-controlled Senate apparently made sure that the room where the hearing was held was packed with supporters of the gun ban. Attendees cheered witnesses who testified in favor of the ban, particularly when they clashed with Republicans on the committee….





Gun Grabbing Fascist Feinstein: Assault Guns Are “Unnecessary Personal Pleasures”

February 26, 2013 3 comments

TWG: Hey, Feinstein, you STUPID, FASCIST, EVIL BITCH…… What are some of the other “personal pleasures” and UNALIENABLE RIGHTS you’d like to try to steal from the American Citizens who pay you and who put your fat ass on that throne from which you wag your hooves????   Time for you to go to pasture. Preferrably in handcuffs.


Sen. Dianne Feinstein: Assault guns are unnecessary ‘personal pleasures’


**FILE** Sen. Dianne Feinstein seeks to reimpose weapons bans that expired in 2004. The California Democrat’s current bill would go further than her 1994 law, which was sunsetted. (Associated Press)

By Cheryl K. Chumley

The Washington Times

Tuesday, February 26, 2013

Just in case you thought the Democratic push for a federal ban on assault weapons might die a quiet death in the House, where Republicans hold the majority, now comes Sen. Dianne Feinstein to assure otherwise.

Assault weapons are “personal pleasure[s]” that should not take precedence over the good of the nation,” she said.

“We will make the case that these weapons do not belong on the streets of our cities,” she said, during an MSNBC appearance. “I recognize it’s an uphill battle. … [But] the mothers, the women, the men of American have to make a decision as to whether their personal pleasure is more important than the general welfare.”

She is vowing to continue to fight for the ban, no matter how long the debate takes.

An all-out ban is constitutional, she said, according to a report in PJ Media. And a Judiciary Committee hearing set for Wednesday is packed with witnesses — U.S. Attorney for Colorado John Walsh, Milwaukee Police Chief Ed Flynn, Philadelphia Mayor Michael Nutter, to name a few — who will be making that same argument, PJ Media adds.

“I intend to fight. I did it once before. If it doesn’t get done right now, be assured I will continue to press the case,” she said, in the context of speaking about gun-control proposals that ban assault weapons, according to a PJ Media report.


U.S. Marine Veteran Pens Letter To Gun Grabbing Hypocrite Dianne Feinstein

January 1, 2013 11 comments




Josh Boston was a Marine deployed to Afghanistan between the years of 2004 through 2005. He is no longer in the Marines but penned this letter to Senator Dianne Feinstein following her announcement to outlaw 120 specifically-named firearms including certain semiautomatic rifles, handguns, and shotguns..

CNNi reported:

Senator Dianne Feinstein,

I will not register my weapons should this bill be passed, as I do not believe it is the government’s right to know what I own. Nor do I think it prudent to tell you what I own so that it may be taken from me by a group of people who enjoy armed protection yet decry me having the same a crime. You ma’am have overstepped a line that is not your domain. I am a Marine Corps Veteran of 8 years, and I will not have some woman who proclaims the evil of an inanimate object, yet carries one, tell me I may not have one.

I am not your subject. I am the man who keeps you free. I am not your servant. I am the person whom you serve. I am not your peasant. I am the flesh and blood of America.
I am the man who fought for my country. I am the man who learned. I am an American. You will not tell me that I must register my semi-automatic AR-15 because of the actions of some evil man.

I will not be disarmed to suit the fear that has been established by the media and your misinformation campaign against the American public.

We, the people, deserve better than you.

Respectfully Submitted,
Joshua Boston
Cpl, United States Marine Corps

Warner Todd Huston spoke with Joshua Boston about his letter.



More Lunacy From California DIMwit, Dianne Feinstein

September 9, 2012 Leave a comment

[TWG: That putrid HAG needs to be courtesy flushed. Californians really ought to consider putting their crack pipes down, no more sniffing glue and stop huffing paint. If they re-elect that fascist, gun-grabbing hag, they deserve exactly what’s coming their way.]


Loony California Senator refuses to debate Republican challenger Elizabeth Emken – walks out of ABC interview when asked why (Video)

feinsteinIn a state as far left and nearly bankrupt as California, this probably wouldn’t matter much. The drones in the failed state will vote to re-elect to old loony Senator Diane Feinstein no matter what she does. But Republican challenger Elizabeth Emken wants at least one debate with the dried up old witch and she wouldn’t even do a debate. In fact, Feinstein became so offended about the question as to why she wouldn’t debate Emken that she walked out of a softball local ABC interview. If this state re-elected Barbara Boxer in 2010, I have no doubt they will re-elect Feinstein.



Senate DIMS Sneak Yet Another Anti Gun Amendment Into Cybersecurity Bill

July 27, 2012 9 comments

[TWG Note: Those sleazy, sneaky bastards can’t be trusted one bit. Every time we look at what they’re up to, they’re trying to sneak another fascist law into our lives.   Watching those low life pigs “work” is worse than inviting a convicted pedophile into your home to raise your children for you.  They are our REPRESENTATIVES. NOT OUR RULERS.  When are We, The People going to wake the hell up and FIRE THOSE EVIL, SNEAKY, LYING , FASCIST VERMIN?]


Senate Democrats slipped in a gun control amendment to a cybersecurity bill Friday, claiming that it is time to impose “reasonable gun control measures,” according to The Hill.

The cybersecurity bill has advanced to the stage in the process when amendments can be attached. Amendments to bills often have nothing to do with the issue being addressed in the bill itself.

Senators Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., Frank Lautenberg, D-N.J., Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., Bob Menendez, D-N.J., and Jack Reed, D-R.I., sponsored bill S.A. 2575 which would make it illegal to possess or transfer large capacity magazines, belts, feed stripes, or drums holding more than 10 rounds of ammunition….(Con’t)



%d bloggers like this: