Archive

Posts Tagged ‘hillary clinton’

Special Operations Speaks: State Department Ineptitude and Coverup of Benghazigate

December 20, 2012 1 comment

sos-header-650.png

benghazigate-report.jpg

 

Dear Fellow Americans:

On Tuesday night, the State Department finally published a report on what their so-called Accountability Review Board has determined happened in Libya, and according to them, two things are certain:

There was massive leadership failure, and not a single person should be held responsible.

You heard that right.

Despite isolating 24 distinct and major recommendations for how the State Department could’ve avoided this travesty, apparently they “did not find reasonable cause to determine that any individual U.S. government employee breached his or her duty.” Really?

SIGN THE PETITION TO DEMAND AN INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION
End the Benghazi Smoke Screen, Hold Senior Officials Accountable

 

benghazigate-meme.jpgLet’s list just a few of ways that State Department officials did “breach their duty.”

•    First and most outrageously, U.S. officials actually lost the Ambassador for several hours – and only found him because an Arabic-speaking man called the consulate from the Ambassador’s cell phone.

•    There were “systemic failures and leadership and management deficiencies at senior levels [leaving Benghazi security] grossly inadequate to deal with the attack that took place.”

•    The security staff was “inexperienced… short-term… and inadequate.”

•    The Consulate in Benghazi “was not a high priority for Washington when it came to security-related requests, especially those relating to staffing.”

•    Despite evidence of growing unrest and increased terrorist threat and the fact it was the anniversary of 9/11, the attacks were “were unanticipated in their scale and intensity.”

•    As we suspected, an unmanned drone was dispatched and at the scene at the time, meaning top officials had visual feed of the attack – leaving no question that they willfully misled the American people by attributing this to a protest.

In what world could anyone consider these points within the bounds of the State Department’s duty to the people of the United States?

Is basic competence not a requirement for being a senior official at the State Department?

Is ignoring a growing and present terrorist threat something that gets a “meets expectations” on their yearly reviews?

Is intentionally lying to the very public that they are supposed to serve all in a day’s work for Hillary Clinton and her top-tier cronies?

 

SIGN THE PETITION TO DEMAND AN INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION
End the Benghazi Smoke Screen, Hold Senior Officials Accountable

 

The State Department can pretend that this “independent board” has cleared them of malfeasance, but no reasonable person could call this massive incompetence even remotely acceptable.

We’re glad that after months of putting serious pressure on the Obama Administration we’re finally starting to see some answers – answers that confirm many of our suspicions, and allude to the confirmation of others.

That said, this report is the bureaucratic version of a curved test grade; by their assessment, because the entire system failed, no one is individually responsible.

It’s time for the obfuscation and the smoke screens to end. We have to keep up the pressure so that whoever caused this internal breakdown is held accountable.

We can’t accept the insider political protectionism that Hillary Clinton is pushing. She “accepts their recommendations” but clearly has no intentions of removing those officials who caused her department’s systemic failure – or of accepting any culpability for it herself.

We must demand that these utterly incompetent senior officials be identified and punished to the highest possible extent.

 

SIGN THE PETITION TO DEMAND AN INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION
End the Benghazi Smoke Screen, Hold Senior Officials Accountable

 

Our men and women abroad are losing their lives because of the Obama Administration’s leadership failure. Their families, their fellow armed forces, and the American people deserve real answers, and real changes in this Administration.

And we won’t stop until they get it.

Sincerely,

 

larry-bailey-sig-1.jpg

Larry Bailey
Captain (SEAL), USN (Retired)
Co-Founder, Special Operations Speaks

P.S. We’ve been pushing our resources to the limit to hold the Obama Administration’s feet to the fire and rally the America people together to find the truth. If we’re going to finally mount an attack powerful enough to take them down, it’s going to require people across this country working together to surmount their liberal machine.

Thousands of patriots have already stepped up and given generously to get the message out.  Will you join them? Your donation of just $5, $10, $25, or $50 will make a huge difference, letting us reach thousands more patriots just like you. Please give whatever you’re able today.

If you prefer to donate by check:

Special Operations Speaks PAC
209 Pennsylvania Avenue, SE
Suite 2109
Washington, DC 20003

 

 


If you would like to contribute by mail, send checks to:
Special Operations Speaks | 209 Pennsylvania Avenue, SE | Washington, DC 20013

Hitlery and Hamas…. A Picture Worth 57 Words

November 21, 2012 1 comment

 

Take a good, hard look at hitlery with her islamic terrorist pal, abbas, today.  

communists and islamic terrorists, hamas…… BFF’s.

 

We, the People are their enemies, while the enemies of America are their allies. They’ve successfully redefined the term “terrorist” and “TREASON”.

 

I wonder if she brought iranian terrorist valerie jarrett with her to make some more dirty deals with iran, hezbollah and hamas.

 

 

The REAL Reason Behind Benghazi Terrorist Attacks – obama Regime GunRunning To Their Jihadist Pals In Syria….

October 24, 2012 15 comments

***UPDATED***

Ambassador Stevens was the point man for Obama to funnel arms to the Libya rebels first to take out Gaddafi, and now from Libya to Syria – through Turkey – to take out Assad.

It’s pretty compelling: Watch the video

*************************************************

President Obama’s once seemingly unstoppable march toward re-election hit what he might call “bumps in the road” in Benghazi, Libya, late on Sept. 11, 2012. It might be more accurate to describe the effect of the well-planned and -executed, military-style attack on a diplomatic facility there as the political equivalent of a devastating improvised explosive device on the myth of the unassailability of the Obama record as commander in chief.

Thanks to intrepid investigative reporting — notably by Bret Baier and Catherine Herridge at Fox News, Aaron Klein at WND.com and Clare Lopez at RadicalIslam.org — and information developed by congressional investigators, the mystery is beginning to unravel with regard to what happened that night and the reason for the subsequent, clumsy official cover-up now known as Benghazigate.

The evidence suggests that the Obama administration has not simply been engaging, legitimating, enriching and emboldening Islamists who have taken over or are ascendant in much of the Middle East. Starting in March 2011, when American diplomat J. Christopher Stevens was designated the liaison to the “opposition” in Libya, the Obama administration has been arming them, including jihadists like Abdelhakim Belhadj, leader of the al Qaeda franchise known as the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group.

Once Moammar Gadhafi was overthrown, Stevens was appointed ambassador to the new Libya run by Mr. Belhadj and his friends. Not surprisingly, one of the most important priorities for someone in that position would be to try to find and secure the immense amount of armaments that had been cached by the dictator around the country and systematically looted during and after the revolution.

One of the places in Libya most awash with such weapons in the most dangerous of hands is Benghazi. It now appears that Stevens was there — on a particularly risky day, with no security to speak of and despite now copiously documented concerns about his own safety and that of his subordinates — for another priority mission: sending arms recovered from the former regime’s stocks to the “opposition” in Syria. As in Libya, the insurgents are known to include al Qaeda and other Shariah-supremacist groups, including none other than Abdelhakim Belhadj.

Fox News has chronicled how the Al Entisar, a Libyan-flagged vessel carrying 400 tons of cargo, docked on Sept. 6 in the Turkish port of Iskenderun. It reportedly supplied both humanitarian assistance and arms — including deadly SA-7 man-portable surface-to-air missiles — apparently destined for Islamists, again including al Qaeda elements, in Syria.

What cries out for further investigation — and debate in the remaining days of this presidential election — is whether this shipment was part of a larger covert Obama effort to transfer weapons to our enemies that could make the Iran-Contra scandal, to say nothing of Operation Fast and Furious, pale by comparison.

Investigative journalist Aaron Klein has reported that the “consulate in Benghazi” actually was no such thing. He observes that although administration officials have done nothing to correct that oft-repeated characterization of the facility where the murderous attack on Stevens and his colleagues was launched, they call it a “mission.” What Mr. Klein describes as a “shabby, nondescript building” that lacked any “major public security presence” was, according to an unnamed Middle Eastern security official, “routinely used by Stevens and others to coordinate with the Turkish, Saudi and Qatari governments on supporting the insurgencies in the Middle East, most prominently the rebels opposing Assad’s regime in Syria.”

We know that Stevens‘ last official act was to hold such a meeting with an unidentified “Turkish diplomat.” Presumably, the conversation involved additional arms shipments to al Qaeda and its allies in Syria. It also may have involved getting more jihadi fighters there. After all, Mr. Klein reported last month that, according to sources in Egyptian security, our ambassador was playing a “central role in recruiting jihadists to fight Bashar al-Assad’s regime in Syria.”

It gets worse. Last week, Center for Security Policy senior fellow and former career CIA officer Clare Lopez observed that there were two large warehouse-type buildings associated with the so-called “consulate” whose purpose has yet to be disclosed. As their contents were raided in the course of the attack, we may never know for sure whether they housed — and were known by the local jihadis to house — arms, perhaps administered by the two former Navy SEALs killed along with Stevens.

What we do know is that the New York Times — one of the most slavishly pro-Obama publications in the country — reported in an Oct. 14 article, “Most of the arms shipped at the behest of Saudi Arabia and Qatar to supply Syrian rebel groups fighting the government of Bashar Assad are going to hard-line Islamic jihadists, and not the more secular opposition groups that the West wants to bolster.”

In short, it seems President Obama has been engaged in gun-walking on a massive scale. The effect has been to equip America’s enemies to wage jihad not only against regimes it once claimed were our friends, but inevitably against us and our allies as well. That would explain his administration’s desperate and now failing bid to mislead the voters through the serial deflections of Benghazigate.

Frank J. Gaffney Jr. is president of the Center for Security Policy (SecureFreedom.org), a columnist for The Washington Times and host of Secure Freedom Radio on WRC-AM (1260).

Who “Built It” In The Middle East?: Four Women – Clinton, Rice, Power, Jarrett

September 17, 2012 2 comments

[TWG:  I highly recommend you take a few moments to read these articles.  It’s jaw dropping to see how this is unfolding today.   Most of us Conservatives who’ve been paying attention are watching this with horror as our Nation commits a slow, painful suicide.  The obama nation is the largest, most diabolical hoax ever perpetrated on global humanity.  Americans aren’t the only people who are going to suffer deeply as a result of the efforts by this horrid regime. These articles are dated. It’s amazing to see how the red flags were raised back in ’08 and how Valerie Jarrett, Samantha Power, Susan Rice and Hillary Clinton have reengineered the Middle East, enabling the muslim brotherhood and al queda to take control of governing those nations.  The muslin brotherhood and al queada re NOT allies of the United States of America.  They are allies of the obama regime.]

Hat tip TheConservativeHillbilly for the forward. Thanks, Hillbilly!

 

Three women who brought us the new long war in Libya

March 21, 2011 — bunkerville

A great read over at Right Wing News with the back story regarding the Ladies who brought us the new long war. Ever hear of Samantha Power? Susan Rice? Their background check is well worth sliding over for the full thing:

One thing is clear: The sudden emergence of Obama’s National Security Council Advisor, Samantha Power, and the “new theory” she is using as justification for action in Libya, has very serious implications for future military action against Israel. As John Podhoretz explains in the New York Post, the “reason” behind the Libyan military strike is not the traditional justification of “protecting the national interest.” It is a “new” standard called “R2P” or “right to protect.” This concept is being promulgated by the “one-world” order activists at the United Nations, like Samantha Power.

“R2P is an effort to create a new international moral standard to prevent violence against civilians.

In her career as a genocide expert, Power was an indefatigable proponent of R2P, and now on the National Security Council has been “trying to figure out how the administration could implement R2P and what doing so would require of the White House going forward.” Hillary is her ally in this effort, it appears.”

Who is Samantha Power, Irish Pro-Palestinian Activist (see also Ed Lasky, American Thinker)

 

The Real Reasons Behind Libya Attack: Petrobras, Soros, 3 Women, “New” U.N. Agenda

Three women in the Obama administration lobbied the President hard, over the span of a few hours, to approve the strike in Libya over the advice of his military and defense leaders. (Josh Rogin at the Cable has a full report on the meeting.)

New York Times:

“The change became possible, though, only after [Secretary of State] Mrs. Clinton joined Samantha Power, a senior aide at the National Security Council, and Susan Rice, Mr. Obama’s ambassador to the United Nations, who had been pressing the case for military action, according to senior administration officials speaking only on condition of anonymity. Ms. Power is a former journalist and human rights advocate; Ms. Rice was an Africa adviser to President Clinton when the United States failed to intervene to stop the Rwanda genocide, which Mr. Clinton has called his biggest regret.

Now, the three women were pushing for American intervention to stop a looming humanitarian catastrophe in Libya.

In joining Ms. Rice and Ms. Power, Mrs. Clinton made an unusual break with Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates, who, along with the national security adviser, Thomas E. Donilon, and the counterterrorism chief, John O. Brennan, had urged caution. Libya was not vital to American national security interests, the men argued, and Mr. Brennan worried that the Libyan rebels remained largely unknown to American officials, and could have ties to Al Qaeda.”

Samantha Power, Irish activist, Nat’l Security Council advisor to Obama
Samantha Power is virulently anti-Semitic, (here and here) ( having once labeled the Israelis “bastards” in a “scholarly papers) and has years of writings in major publications to show that she is devotedly anti-Israel, pro-Iran, and opposed to any supporter of Israel (See Richard Baehr and Ed Lasky’s article for American Thinker in 2008 on Ms. Power’s background. Please read the entire disturbing documentation.)
A review of her philosophy about when military intervention is or is not needed should cause the allies and the Arab League, and certainly the American public, to question why she is advocating for an attack on Muammar Gaddafi. One must ask, what master is Ms. Power serving and why do we want our military personnel in harm’s way for ANYTHING THAT SHE ADVOCATES?
 

 “Power also advocates that America send armed military forces, “a mammoth protection force” and an “external intervention”, to impose a settlement between Israel and the Palestinians. This directly contradicts her criticism of the invasion and “occupation” of Iraq and her call for the removal of American forces from that nation. On the one hand, Power abhors American efforts to remake an Arab nation, but takes the contrary view when it comes to inserting American forces in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict in order to impose a settlement. These troops, if sent, would be seen as occupiers and be sitting targets for Arab extremists. The colonial image of America and charges of imperial overstretch would echo throughout the Arab world.”

 

[]Susan Rice, U.N. Ambassador
This shameful United Nations ambassador,with her most recent anti-Israel tirade, gashed open an already-raw-wound in Obama administration U.S. Israeli relations.Rice, who now purports to be so concerned about the “human rights violations” committed by Muammar Gaddafi in putting down a revolution, is behind the horrific appointment of Iran to the United Nations Commission on the Status of Women.This despite such facts as Iran is a country whose prison guards rape female inmates before executing them because it is illegal under shariah law to kill a virgin.

And now she is a senior foreign policy adviser to Presidential candidate Barack Obama, as well as occupying the Anna Lindh Professorship of Practice of Global Leadership and Public Policy How appropriate: Anna Lindh, the late Swedish Foreign Minister, was a dedicated opponent of Israel.”

 

Continue Reading & Comments: http://bunkerville.wordpress.com/2011/03/21/three-women-who-brought-us-the-new-long-war-in-libya/#comment-15936

United States’ Veto Rights At The United Nations In Serious Peril


I suggest you all pay VERY CLOSE attention to what hitlery is doing over at the UN.  She’s using the Syria situation to relinquish our veto rights at the UN, which will allow those beasts to impose the provisions in the Arms Trade Treaty, the Law Of The Sea Treaty and anything else that pack of islamic terrorists, dictatorial tyrants and genocidal murderers want to impose on the United States of America.

WATCH HER.  Watch what she says about the fact that Russia isn’t allowing the UN to step in with regard to Syria.  This is why she’s spreading rumors about Syria and nerve agents being moved around there.  If individual Nation members had no veto rights, the UN could do whatever the global elitists want them to do, INCLUDING THE COMPLETE DESTRUCTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA’S CONSTITUTION, BILL OF RIGHTS AND SOVEREIGNTY.

WATCH HER.  She’s selling us out to the tyrants of the UN.  Her and her slick willie have already secured their positions at that cabal.  They’re selling us out.  We will, very soon, have war here on our soil that will dwarf any war in the history of the world.

WATCH HER.

Dictator obama May Finally Finagle His Internet Kill Switch

May 7, 2012 1 comment

Obama Could Finally Acquire Elusive Internet “Kill Switch”

May 7, 2012 By   
 
 

Barack Obama 8 SC 300x199 Obama Could Finally Acquire Elusive Internet “Kill Switch”

For three years Barack Hussein Obama and his handlers have labored to create a functioning dictatorship in the midst of a constitutional republic. It was shamefully easy at first. With unassailable majorities in House and Senate, even a Republican leadership unafraid to contest the excesses of the first black president would have been powerless to slow the implementation of his agenda.

The left passed ObamaCare, giving itself the means of executing a calculated program of attrition against millions of reliably Republican seniors. At the same time, a corrupt Department of Justice worked to undermine the 2nd Amendment, interfered with the effort of states to legislate against voter fraud and facilitated the entry of millions of illegals by refusing to enforce immigration law.

Even a disastrous midterm election has not slowed Obama’s acquisition of power as 190 House Republicans helped vote into law the infamous National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), providing the Commander and Chief unlimited authority to detain and imprison without due process any American he considers a threat to national security.

But one vitally important power has eluded the usurper in the White House, that being the legal means to control the world-wide web. Countless attempts have been made to provide Obama that longed for internet “kill switch,” many of them originating with Senator Joe Lieberman. Yet from Net Neutrality to the 2010 “Protecting Cyberspace as a National Asset Act,” all have met with such an outcry from left and right alike that they have died in Congress.

All, that is, until now…..

 

CONTINUE READING: http://www.westernjournalism.com/obama-might-finally-acquire-elusive-internet-kill-switch/

 

Dictator obama and Comrade hitlery. A match made in HELL.

What Is a “Saul Alinsky Radical”?


  • Identified a set of very specific rules that ordinary citizens could follow, and tactics that ordinary citizens could employ, as a means of gaining public power
  • Created a blueprint for revolution under the banner of “social change”
  • Two of his most notable modern-day disciples are Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama.

 

See also:  Cloward-Piven Strategy   Industrial Areas Foundation

Born to Russian-Jewish parents in Chicago in 1909, Saul Alinsky was a Communist/Marxist fellow-traveler who helped establish the tactics of infiltration — coupled with a measure of confrontation — that have been central to revolutionary political movements in the United States in recent decades. He never joined the Communist Party but instead, as David Horowitz puts it, became an avatar of the post-modern left.

Though Alinsky is rightfully understood to have been a leftist, his legacy is more methodological than ideological. He identified a set of very specific rules that ordinary citizens could follow, and tactics that ordinary citizens could employ, as a means of gaining public power. His motto was, “The most effective means are whatever will achieve the desired results.”

Alinsky studied criminology as a graduate student at the University of Chicago, during which time he became friendly with Al Capone and his mobsters. Ryan Lizza, senior editor of The New Republic, offers a glimpse into Alinsky’s personality: “Charming and self-absorbed, Alinsky would entertain friends with stories — some true, many embellished — from his mob days for decades afterward. He was profane, outspoken, and narcissistic, always the center of attention despite his tweedy, academic look and thick, horn-rimmed glasses.”…

 

CONTINUE READING: http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=2314&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+fpmdtn+%28FrontPage+Magazine+%C2%BB+Discover+the+Networks%29

%d bloggers like this: