Archive

Posts Tagged ‘military’

PROOF: Government PLANNED Monday’s DC Naval Base Mass Murder

September 17, 2013 1 comment

 

 

Video Courtesy of D.Simons  TPC  Hat tip D.SImons. Thank you very much.

 

“The ends justify the means.”

RIGHT, you GOD DAMNED MARXIST BEASTS?

Very well. As long as we understand the “rules”.

Furious Military Families Are Outing the obama Regime

October 27, 2012 4 comments

[TWG:  It’s appalling to me that we have Veterans and current members of the Military supporting obama and his marxist regime.  They are TRAITORS, spitting in the faces and on the graves  of each and every one of our Veterans who’ve ever served this Nation in the fight against fascist dictators and evildoers.   General Colin Powell expressed support for that marxist back during the ’08 “election”, and reiterated his support for marxism last week.  Apparently, General Powell approves of the fact that  marxist obama, clinton and panetta is responsible for the deaths of 4 Americans in Benghazi, two of them being Navy SEAL’s. He approves of the fact that the obama regime were trafficking weapons to muslim  terrorists within al queda and the muslim brotherhood, and that the obama regime’s PROVEN allegiance is with islamic terrorists. Apparently, the Veterans and members of the Military currently supporting the marxists approve of how they’re handling islam and in their marxist/fascist ideologies.  THEY ARE TRAITORS TO THIS NATION AND TO EVERY VETERAN WHO HAS EVER SERVED. CALL THEM WHAT THEY ARE.  MARXIST TRAITORS.]

 

October 16, 2012

Military Families are Outing Obama

By Karin McQuillan

American military and State Department families that have lost their sons in the war against Islamic jihadis are outing President Obama for playing politics with the lives (and deaths) of their sons.  Speaking out in some of the most painful interviews ever shown on television, they directly blame the president for the loss of their sons’ lives.  Their accusations speak directly to Obama’s competence in defending our national security.

Iran is on the brink of possessing nuclear weapons.  Egypt’s elected President Mubarak, the keystone to stability in the Middle East for the last 30 years, was pressured by President Obama to step down in favor of the terror group the Muslim Brotherhood.  The Benghazi embassy was denied Marine protection, even on 9/11, with the subsequent tragedy and White House cover-up.  We haven’t lost an ambassador since Jimmy Carter’s incompetence.  Obama’s Middle East policy has been a disaster, with one exception — the killing of Osama bin Laden by Navy SEAL Team 6.

The president ran the special ops raid on Osama bin Laden’s compound with one eye on national security and the other on political opportunism.  Intelligence was compromised because there was political advantage to Obama to do so.  Within a day, the White House divulged details of the attack, including that it was carried out by SEAL Team Six.

Three months later, 22 men from SEAL Team 6 were dead, victims of Obama’s policies and politics.  This story has been buried, until this 9/11….(Con’t)

 

CONTINUE READING: http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/10/m-military_families_are_outing_obama.html

 

 

Yet ANOTHER Veteran Detained, Declared ‘Mentally Defective,’ Has Guns Seized By Obama’s Nazi Squads

August 27, 2012 3 comments

News of similar case emerges day after release of Brandon Raub

Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
Friday, August 24, 2012

Just a day after Brandon Raub was released following his incarceration in a psychiatric ward over political Facebook posts, news has emerged of a similar case involving a veteran who had his guns seized after being labeled a “mental defective’ and faces being committed by a judge.

Radio host Steve Quayle was sent news of an Army combat veteran and Purple Heart recipient in west central Ohio who was the victim of a police raid on the evening of August 22nd during which Miami County Ohio Sheriff’s deputies executed a search warrant to seize the man’s firearms for the “safety of the defendant and the general public,” according to the warrant.

The veteran, who is currently unnamed, had his guns taken because he was adjudged to be mentally incompetent, despite the fact that his previous VA psychiatric evaluations were all clear, he is not on medication, and he had no criminal record. The man appears to be a respected member of the community – he works for a Christian company and his father is a police officer and a pastor.

“The person is under adjudication of mental incompetence, has been adjudicated as a mental defective, has been committed to a mental institution, has been found by a court to be a mentally ill person subject to hospitalization by court order, or is an involuntary patient other than one who is a patient only for purposes of observation. As used in this division, “mentally ill person subject to hospitalization by court order” and “patient” have the same meanings as in section 5122.01 of the Revised Code,” states the warrant.

Amongst the items confiscated were a .45 caliber pistol, one .380 caliber pistol, a 12 gauge shotgun, two AR-15 rifles, a stripped AR-15 lower receiver, as well as a hunting knife.

“In addition to the confiscations, the deputies attempted to question my friend and his fiancée,” states the email sent to Quayle by the man’s friend. “I didn’t get specific details on the questions asked. They refused to answer any questions without an attorney present. When my friend stated, “This is bullshit,” one of the deputy detectives remarked, “Look man, I’m just doing my job.”

 

 

The veteran now faces “an evaluation of mental competency” with a judge who will decide whether he should be committed to a state psychiatric ward. If any more weapons are found on the man’s property in the interim he will have committed a felony and will face a jail sentence.

Since the veteran is active in the so-called truth movement or patriot community, it is assumed that his involvement in this field is part of the reason why he has been targeted for psychiatric evaluation.

“Unlike Brandon Raub’s case, however, the state of Ohio won’t allow law enforcement to involuntarily commit a person unless there is an immediate need to do so, such as holding a gun to their head or another person’s head,” states the email. “Ohio law requires a judge to make the decision on having a person evaluated for mental illness. Of course, you’re then evaluated by a state-appointed psych, and that isn’t exactly going to play out in your favor. Had my friend lived in Virginia, he may be sitting in a metal hospital (prison) right now. Or worse.”

The veteran’s lawyer has already filed motions attempting to discover who asked the judge to sign the search warrant and for what reason he was declared mentally defective.

Earlier this year, we reported on a similar case involving David Sarti, one of the participants in the National Geographic Channel’s Doomsday Prepper show. Sarti visited his doctor complaining of chest pains, only to have the doctor later commit him to a psychiatric ward and alert authorities, before Sarti was declared “mentally defective” and put on an FBI list that stripped him of his second amendment rights.

Brandon Raub, a former veteran of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, was also involuntarily detained for psychiatric questioning last week by authorities in Virginia’s Chesterfield County for leaving anti-establishment messages on Facebook which questioned the official story behind 9/11 and referred to corruption within the U.S. government. Raub also posted song lyrics on a private message board.

The FBI claimed Raub’s posts were “terrorist in nature” and yet within a week Raub was ordered to be released by a judge who found that the original petition for his detention contained no facts whatsoever on the reason for his incarceration.

Raub’s lawyer John Whitehead revealed that shortly before his release, psychiatrists had threatened to forcibly medicate Raub in order to “brainwash” him.

Whitehead warned that there were 20,000 recent cases in Virginia alone of people being snatched from their homes having been declared mentally defective by the state with virtually no due process whatsoever and with the victim having committed no crime.

Critics have made comparisons to the infamous psikhushka psychiatric prisons in the former Soviet Union where dissidents were sent to be isolated, brainwashed, and have their political ideas discredited amongst the general public.

Given the fact that the Department of Homeland Security has repeatedly demonized veterans as likely domestic terrorists, it’s clear that former servicemen are being targeted as part of an effort to chill free speech and discourage other veterans from being politically active.

Source

obama Regime Committed To Hiking TRICARE Fees, Veterans Continue To Support His Regime


[TWG Note: obama and his dim grunts…. sticking it to our Veterans…. AGAIN.  Yet many of our Veterans will support them anyway.  Sure wish those Veterans would OPEN THEIR EYES. Any Veteran who would support marxist obama and his socialist/marxist/communist FASCIST regime is a TRAITOR. Their fellow Veterans from wars past did not fight FOR fascism. They fought AGAINST fascism.]

 

WH Committed to TRICARE Fee Hikes

May 16, 2012 | Terry Howell

The House Armed Services Committee recently forwarded the National Defense Authorization Act for FY 2013 (HR4310) to the full House for a vote. The bill added back many of the cuts proposed by the White House, and ignored the DoD’s request to increase TRICARE Fees for military retirees. (Read the original post)

While most expect it to pass in the House, it is also assumed that the Senate will not pass the current version. And, of course the President would surely veto it if it happened to make it through the Senate. On Wednesday the Office of Management and Budget that confirmed that the President would veto the bill. The OMB statement states, “If the cumulative effects of the bill impede the ability of the Administration to execute the new defense strategy and to properly direct scarce resources, the President’s senior advisors would recommend to the President that he veto the bill.”

The OMB’s  ”Statement of Administration Policy” responded to the House bill,  declaring the administration’s “disappointment” with the House for not supporting their budget recommendations. The report highlights specific sections of the HR 4310 that differ from their plan, such as limits to the reduction in forces, BRAC, missile defense, and limitations on reduction of nuclear forces, to name a few.

One of the areas we have been watching closely on the Military Advantage is the proposal to hike TRICARE fees. The statement makes it clear that the WH is committed to using the fee increases to make TRICARE sustainable.

The following is an excerpt from the OMB statement:

TRICARE Fees and Co-Payments:  The Administration agrees that retirees deserve a quality health care benefit.  For this very reason, the Administration strongly supports its requested TRICARE fee initiatives that seek to control the spiraling health care costs of the Department of Defense (DOD) while keeping retired beneficiaries’ share of these costs well below the levels experienced when the TRICARE program was implemented in the mid-1990s.  The projected FY 2013 TRICARE savings of $1.8 billion and $12.9 billion through FY 2017 are essential for DOD to successfully address rising personnel costs.  DOD needs these savings to balance and maintain investments for key defense priorities.  The Administration is very disappointed that the Committee did not support the proposed TRICARE fee increases and included section 718, which, while supporting some fee increases, caps them at levels below those allowed under current law and below the requested authorization.  If section 718 remains in the bill, it would only provide five year savings of $2.6 billion.”

Let your elected official know what you think about this issue.

Read more: http://militaryadvantage.military.com/2012/05/wh-committed-to-hiking-tricare-fees/#ixzz1vbmy98sx
MilitaryAdvantage.Military.com

 

HEY OBAMA—–OUR MILITARY AND AIR FORCE ONE DO NOT BELONG TO YOU!

May 12, 2012 2 comments

Air Force One, Military Do Not Belong to Obama

By Roy A. Barnes

CBS News reported Friday that President Barack Obama held a fundraiser in Los Angeles at the home of movie actor George Clooney Thursday, and raised about $15 million.

Yet the most troubling part of the report was the following words, “The star of the evening, the president, arrived at LAX in his private jet, Air Force One.”

The mainstream media had better get this straight — Air Force One is not the “private jet” of the president, period. We are supposed to live in a country where presidents don’t conduct themselves like kings, and the establishment media enables this “king” mentality with such reporting. Continued references like this are a big turn off to voters, especially to those who are struggling. And the president needs to also keep that in mind because he’s had an issue about what is his and isn’t this week.

If Air Force One belongs to Obama, why do taxpayers pay the brunt of the $179,750 per hour for the operating costs of this plane, per Defense Department calculations as reported by WSOC-TV? Individuals or corporations who own private jets pay all of the operating costs. By CBS News’ logic, Obama should be paying all of these costs. On his presidential salary of $400,000 per year, that wouldn’t be enough to run the plane three hours.

As for the president himself, when he came out for same sex marriage earlier this week, he made an interesting reference to the military during his interview with ABC, remarking, “those soldiers or airmen or Marines or sailors who are out there fighting on my behalf,” as reported by The Weekly Standard.

As the troops are stationed around the world risking their lives, they aren’t doing so on the president’s behalf. When other Americans get up to face the challenges of the day, they are doing this for themselves, their families and loved ones, not the president. On the other hand, when Obama gets up every day, he’s supposed to be working on behalf of the American people.

Obama’s re-election campaign can spend tons of money trying to get out its message to contrast Mitt Romney’s message, but such overt attitudes about what supposedly belongs to Obama don’t fall on deaf ears to voters.

The mainstream media and Obama need to watch their language regarding what belongs to whom.

%d bloggers like this: