Archive

Posts Tagged ‘socialism’

Enviro-Eugenicists Announce Mass Die-Off To Depopulate The World

March 17, 2013 1 comment

Here’s another jaw-dropping report on “The Big Die Off” scientists claiming that murdering mass populations is exactly what they intend to do to us.   Sad to know that the majority of people in this Nation haven’t a clue what “Eugenics” means, who (AND WHAT)  obama appointed as his “Science & Technology” Czar and just how deep this evil slithers.  It’s so outrageous, diabolical and incomprehensible that most people simply will not believe it.  Try to explain it to them and you will be labeled some sort of lunatic.

Here it is, for all to see….. whether they believe it or not: http://explosivereports.com/2013/03/15/enviro-eugenicists-announce-mass-die-off/

I want to know what that E-V-I-L eugenics freak and Ehrlich prodigy, Czar John Holdren, has been cooking up for us in the dark crevices of our White House. With NO Science degree, John Holdren is obama’s “Science and Technology” Czar. Holdren co-wrote a book in 1977, Ecoscience, with Paul and Ann Ehrlich, the eugenics gurus. Population control, a book that mused openly about mass sterilizations, forced abortions, putting sterilants in the water to control the population. It’s the fact that his ideological mentors, including one of the top international eugenics members most renowned, again, for promoting these same ideas of social engineering through the guise of “science” that basically amounts to eugenics and taking away babies from “undesirables”. He was paying homage to this mentor as recently as two years ago at one of the most prominent science gatherings of the country, the AAAS gathering, and there has been little, if any public questioning about it.

Some of obama’s czars have things that are so frightening in their past that no American would approve– if these guys were being appointed by Republicans, the left would be on fire with this. They’d be calling for their treason trials and publicly open town square lynching.

Apparently not only is he in favor of zero population growth but also zero economic growth. He wanted a zero GDP, and here’s one of the quotes in the book that he co-wrote, Ecoscience:

“…. it is now abundantly clear that the GNP cannot grow forever. Why should it? Why should we not strive for zero economic growth as well as zero population growth.” Is there any question in your mind why the obama regime has been so busy systematically decimating all production and manufacturing in our Nation?

Czar John Holdren’s mentor, Harrison Brown, saw the world population as ”a pulsating mass of maggots”. Holdren himself describes the world population as “useless eaters”.

In a section on “Involuntary Fertility Control,” Holdren and the other authors discuss various “coercive” means of population control — including putting sterilants in the drinking water. His concern? “The problem with that method is GETTING THE PEOPLE TO DRINK IT.”

Here’s a few excerpts:

“The third approach to population limitation is that of involuntary fertility control. Several coercive proposals deserve discussion, mainly because some countries may ultimately have to resort to them unless current trends in birth rates are rapidly reversed by other means. …

“Adding a sterilant to drinking water or staple foods is a suggestion that seems to horrify people more than most proposals for involuntary fertility control. Indeed, this would pose some very difficult political, legal, and social questions, to say nothing of the technical problems.”

“To be acceptable, such a substance would have to meet some rather stiff requirements: it must be uniformly effective, despite widely varying doses received by individuals, and despite varying degrees of fertility and sensitivity among individuals; it must be free of dangerous or unpleasant side effects; and it must have no effect on members of the opposite sex, children, old people, pets, or livestock. …

“…this plan has the advantage of avoiding the need for socioeconomic pressures that might tend to discriminate against particular groups or penalize children.”

Later, he concludes, “Most of the population control measures beyond family planning discussed above have never been tried. Some are as yet technically impossible and others are and probably will remain unacceptable to most societies (although, of course, the potential effectiveness of those least acceptable measures may be great).

“Compulsory control of family size is an unpalatable idea, but the alternatives may be much more horrifying. As those alternatives become clearer to an increasing number of people in the 1980s, they may begin demanding such control. A far better choice, in our view, is to expand the use of milder methods of influencing family size preferences, while redoubling efforts to ensure that the means of birth control, including abortion and sterilization, are accessible to every human being on Earth within the shortest possible time. If effective action is taken promptly against population growth, perhaps the need for the more extreme involuntary or repressive measures can be averted in most countries.”

“To date, (1977) there has been no serious attempt in Western countries to use laws to control excessive population growth, although there exists ample authority under which population growth could be regulated. For example, under the United States Constitution, effective population-control programs could be enacted under the clauses that empower Congress to appropriate funds to provide for the general welfare and to regulate commerce, or under the equal-protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Such laws constitutionally could be very broad. Indeed, it has been concluded that compulsory population-control laws, even including laws requiring compulsory abortion, could be sustained under the existing Constitution if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the society. Few today consider the situation in the United States serious enough to justify compulsion, however.”

This comes in a section discussing population law. The authors argue that compulsory abortions could potentially be allowed under U.S. law “if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the society.”

Czar Holdren’s view of the imminent and grave global dangers posed by overpopulation should provide pause, given his current view that global warming now presents imminent and grave global dangers. Keep in mind that this book (Ecoscience) was written in 1977.]

I’d sure like to know what that evil beasts has been cooking up for the American people since he took the throne anointed him by the obama regime. Out of all the treasonists, trolls, demons and terrorists slithering about obama’s regime, Czar Holdren is the only one that truly gives me nightmares.

holdren

Matt Bracken on Democide

February 20, 2013 4 comments

Bracken: Democide

(Hat tip Don B. for the forward. Thank You, Don)

Spread this latest work by Matt Bracken and friends far and wide, especially the video:

Democide: Socialism, Tyranny, Guns and Freedom

Democide is the elimination of a despised group by a government. It includes genocide, politicide, and other forms of state-sponsored mass murder. The hated minority headed for extermination may be defined by religious, racial, political, class, cultural or other attributes. Between 200 and 260 million people were the victims of democide in the 20th century, several times more than were killed in international wars during that period.

The first widely studied modern democide occurred in Turkey between 1915 and 1923, when the Turkish government decided to eliminate the country’s Christian minority, primarily ethnic Armenians and Greeks who had Turkish roots extending back to before the Islamic conquest. Two million Christians were murdered on forced marches into deserts without water or food. This democide occurred in view of Western reporters, who took photographs and posted contemporary wire reports. The fact that the democide was known outside Turkey did not deter the Turkish leaders.

The Armenian Genocide, as it has become known, was also widely known inside Turkey, where the majority Muslim population either supported or at least passively tolerated the democide. It was impossible to miss the sight of thousands of Christians at a time being rounded up and force-marched through towns and into the burning deserts on one-way trips.

Stalin and Hitler both noticed the lack of world reaction to the democide of Turkish Christians and planned accordingly. In the Soviet Union, Stalin’s henchmen purged millions of “kulaks” (farmers deemed to have too much wealth), intellectuals, businessmen, and anyone who had ever traveled outside the USSR or even had had contact with foreigners.

In Germany and Nazi-occupied Europe, Hitler proceeded with his own “final solution to the Jewish problem.” Where the German national socialists simply eliminated Jews as quickly as possible in mass graves and gas chambers, Stalin’s international socialists deported their “class enemies” to Siberia, where they were put to work in Gulag slave-labor camps, with years of torture through cold, malnutrition and brutal working conditions preceding the release of eventual death.

Stalin also devised another means of democide when he ordered the forced starvation of the Ukrainians, and five million more innocent victims were added to his totals. In Communist China seventy million people were the victims of democide, murdered by overwork in slave-labor camps, by direct execution, and by regional forced starvation. Millions more were victims of democide in Pakistan, Cambodia, Rwanda, North Korea, and many other countries.

Democide, as the name implies, does not happen in the dark of night without any awareness of it in the country where it occurs. The Turks knew the Christians were being mass murdered. Average Germans were fully aware of what was happening to the Jews between 1938 and 1945, and a large majority either actively supported or at least tolerated it. (I strongly recommend reading Hitler’s Willing Executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust, by Daniel Goldhagen, to fully appreciate the wholehearted German support for the Jewish democide.)

Today, we sometimes hear that the Second Amendment has outlived its usefulness, that it is a relic of our barbaric past and is no longer needed in the modern era. Horrific mass shootings by deranged individuals are cited as the primary reason for Americans to surrender their most effective firearms and rely solely on a state monopoly of force for their protection. This government-dependent attitude is shortsighted, historically ignorant, and extremely dangerous.

In each of the cases cited above, a necessary preliminary step on the road to democide was the confiscation of privately owned firearms. In Turkey, “reasonable” gun control laws enacted in 1911 permitted the democide of two million Turkish Christians a few years later. In Germany, the “commonsense” 1928 gun control laws of the Weimar Republic preceded Hitler’s Holocaust by a decade.

The Weimar politicians did not intend for their gun control laws to lead to the slaughter of millions of people, but it is an historical fact that those gun control laws permitted the Nazis to carry out their Holocaust. How? By making it economically and militarily feasible to round up and mass murder entire towns without any significant resistance.

In fact, the Nazis quickly learned that they needed only a hundred ordinary military policemen to exterminate towns of a thousand Polish Jews in a single day. Contrast that fact with the Warsaw Ghetto uprising. If the Jews had not first been disarmed, using previous gun registration lists as a map for confiscation, the Holocaust would not have been possible.

Likewise in the Soviet Union and in every other case, democide was preceded by “reasonable and commonsense” firearms registration, followed eventually by gun confiscation and then by the extermination of a despised minority population.

During the past two centuries, while America has avoided tyranny, Turkey, Germany, Russia and the other nations mentioned above have spasmodically lurched between monarchs, democratically elected leaders, and often quite popular dictators, allowing them frequent opportunities to commit democide against their unwanted minorities.

The situation is fundamentally different in America, because we have a centuries-old tradition of private firearms ownership guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the Constitution. The Second Amendment does not “grant” us this right; it puts into writing our God-given natural right to effective self-defense, including armed defense against tyranny.

“Pure democracy” has been described as two wolves and a sheep voting on their dinner plans. The two wolves might see this election as an expression of their highest democratic values, but for the outnumbered sheep, pure democracy is highly problematic. On the other hand, a republic has been described as two wolves and a well-armed sheep voting on dinner plans. The well-armed sheep can veto the outcome of the dinner election simply by brandishing its firearm. The sheep has inherent rights as a sovereign individual, including the right to self-defense, a right that cannot be stripped away by a simple majority vote.

So, when a democratically elected American president speaks of “fundamentally transforming” his country, and of his need to act outside the constitutional framework, the population should be on guard. When that leader begins to push for strict new “commonsense and reasonable” gun control laws, including national firearms registration in the name of “public safety,” the citizenry should be on high alert.

Can any glib politician, pundit or ivory tower academic give us an ironclad guarantee that tyranny will never arise in the United States? Not even a popular tyranny, like those of Ataturk, Stalin, Hitler or Mao? Can anyone assure us that today’s “commonsense” gun registration lists will not be used for future gun confiscation? Of course not.

The future may be unknowable, but history is well understood, and American gun owners know and understand the history of democide in the 20th century. That is why they will never accede to what is currently portrayed in the predominantly left-wing mainstream media as “commonsense and reasonable” new gun control laws.

While American gun owners lament and regret the inescapable fact that deranged individuals in a free country may on rare occasions murder a dozen or a score of unarmed victims, they also understand that government democide murders by the million. And in every case, tyrants can conduct these democides only after disarming their unwanted minorities, rendering them helpless to resist murderous government pogroms.

American gun owners will never permit this historical pattern to be repeated in their country, because they understand that the government’s heavy hand will be kept in check only as long as they are armed. Ask yourself: Were the Armenians, the Jews or the kulaks treated better, or worse, after they were disarmed and rendered helpless by their oppressors, who thereafter held an absolute government monopoly on armed violence? The answer is too obvious to require elaboration.

Naive utopians and other “low-information voters” might not understand the historical pattern, and we don’t expect them to bother to learn it. Cynical and dishonest “progressives” who do understand the historical pattern cannot yet reveal their ultimate goal of creating a disarmed and helpless American citizenry. Nevertheless, millions of Americans understand their hidden aim with crystal clarity, seeing through the false sincerity of power-hungry leftist politicians who are actually Marxist wolves dressed in Democrat sheep’s clothing—for now.

But unless and until these secret Stalinists and sundry other “progressives” can figure out a way to disarm Americans, they cannot execute their historically standard final solution to the “reactionaries-standing-in-the-way-of-utopia” problem. And this is a thorny problem for them, because tens of millions of Americans, disbelieving their deceitful bromides, will stick to their guns no matter what.

Unlike the Armenians, Jews, kulaks and other exterminated peoples, Americans who support the Second Amendment will never be disarmed quietly by government edict prior to meekly boarding a train to a socialist “reeducation” camp. They will not be taken at government gunpoint on a one-way forced march into a desert or a Zyklon-B “delousing shower,” simply because they foolishly agreed to be disarmed by their future oppressors in the dubious name of “public safety.”

If American “progressives” truly intend to disarm the American people, they will have to do it the hard way, by taking their bullets first, one at a time. As the 300 Spartans announced to the vastly larger Persian army at Thermopylae, “Molon Labe!”

You want our guns? Then come and take them!

No registration—no confiscation—no extermination!

Freedom now, freedom forever!

 

Please see the YouTube video of the same title.

Resolution Condemning Socialism As Un-American


[TWG Note: This would be nice, but I highly doubt it will become a congressional record.  Considering the politicians and the communist party have done away with the house committee on un-American activities.  After all……. socialism is communism light.  It’s just another form of fascism.]

 

A House Resolution Condemning Socialism as Anti-American

Below is a proposed House Resolution condemning Socialism as anti-American. Please take action and tweet, email, FB Share, etc. this with your Representative (or a staunch anti-socialist Representative such as Allen West, et al).  
 
There is a movement underway, started by an article in the New York Times, to whitewash and sanitize Socialism as a harmless boogeyman. This cannot stand.
 
We must find sponsors for this Resolution or one like it. Let those who dare oppose it for all to see and hear stand and be counted. If you see the reason in this, please help get this out. If you think it can’t be done, read no further and put your head back in the sand.
 
H.RES.__
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
[DATE]
HOUSE RESOLUTION
 
Condemning Socialism as anti-American.
 
Whereas The Declaration of Independence (the “Declaration”) embodies the essence of “Americanism”;
 
Whereas the tenets of Socialism, in the works of Karl Marx, et al, are the antithesis of the ideals set forth in the Declaration;
 
Whereas The Declaration recognizes the sanctity of the individual and individual rights, stating: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness”;
 
Whereas Socialism mandates the sacrifice of the individual’s life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness to the State, to the collective;
 
Whereas under the Socialist ideal, the State Collective is the despotic arbiter of the needs of each individual, seized and redistributed from each individual according to the State determined ability of the individuals in its collective;
 
Whereas the Declaration states that “to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed”;
 
Whereas Socialism runs anathema to the Declaration, holding that men’s rights are dictated at and by the whim of the Government collective;
 
Whereas the Declaration precludes Socialism, which would create a “Form of Government [which would become] destructive of [the] ends” set forth in the Declaration, triggering the “Right of the People to alter or to abolish” such a Socialist regime;
 
Whereas in the history of Socialist governments is “a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny”;
 
Whereas Socialists programs, such as “Agenda 21” and the” Law of the Sea Treaty,” would require our sovereign Nation to combine “with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving [] Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation”;
 
Whereas the Socialist initiatives would take “away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws and alter[] fundamentally the Form[] of our Government”;
 
Whereas Socialism is anathema to the American ideal of Federalism, that the States “are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States”:  Now, therefore, be it
 
Resolved by the House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That Socialism in any form is condemned as being anti-American, running counter to the American ideals set forth in Our Declaration of Independence.
 

Spread the word! Help find sponsors!

 
 
 

Guide To The MASSIVE George Soros Network (DiscoverTheNetworks.org)

May 22, 2012 2 comments

GUIDE TO THE GEORGE SOROS NETWORK

Source: Discover The Networks

 
George Soros is one of the most powerful men on earth. A New York hedge fund manager, he has amassed a personal fortune estimated at about $13 billion (as of 2009). His company, Soros Fund Management, controls at least another $25 billion in investor assets. Since 1979, Soros’s foundation network — whose flagship is the Open Society Institute (OSI) — has dispensed more than $5 billion to a multitude of organizations whose objectives are consistent with those of Soros. With assets of $1.93 billion as of 2008, OSI alone donates scores of millions of dollars annually to these various groups. Following is a sampling of the major agendas advanced by groups that Soros and OSI support financially. Listed under each category heading are a few OSI donees fitting that description.
Organizations that accuse America of violating the civil rights and liberties of many of its residents: 

  • The Arab American Institute impugnsmany of the “sweeping” and “unreasonable” post-9/11 counterterrorism measures that have unfairly “targeted Arab Americans.”
  • The Bill of Rights Defense Committee has persuaded the political leadership in more than 400 American cities and counties to pledge noncompliance with the anti-terrorism measure known as the Patriot Act, on grounds that the legislation tramples on people’s civil liberties.

Organizations that depict America as a nation whose enduring racism must be counterbalanced by racial and ethnic preferences in favor of nonwhites:

Organizations that specifically portray the American criminal-justice system as racist and inequitable:

  • The Sentencing Project asserts that prison-sentencing patterns discriminate against nonwhites, and seeks“to reduce the reliance on incarceration.”
  • Critical Resistance contendsthat crime stems from “inequality and powerlessness,” which can be rectified through wholesale redistribution of wealth.
  • The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights charges that criminal laws “are enforced in a manner that is massively and pervasively biased.”

Organizations that call for massive social change, and for the recruitment and training of activist leaders to help foment that change:

  • The Center for Community Change is “dedicatedto finding the [progressive] stars of tomorrow and preparing them to lead.”
  • The Gamaliel Foundation teachessocial-change “techniques and methodologies.”
  • The Ruckus Society promotes“nonviolent direct action against unjust institutions and policies.”
  • The American Institute for Social Justiceaims to “transform poor communities” by agitating for increased government spending on social-welfare programs.
  • The Institute for America’s Futureregularly convenes and educatesprogressive leaders, organizations, candidates, opinion makers, and activists.”
  • People for the American Way, founded by television producer Norman Lear to oppose the allegedly growing influence of the “religious right,” seeks“to cultivate new generations of leaders and activists” who will promote “progressive values.”
  • Democracy For America operates an academythat has taught more than 10,000 recruits nationwide how to “focus, network, and train grassroots activists in the skills and strategies to take back our country.”
  • The Midwest Academy trains radical activists in the tactics of direct action, confrontation, and intimidation. Author Stanley Kurtz has described this academy as a “crypto-socialist organization” that was “arguably the most influential force in community organizing from the seventies through the nineties.”

Organizations that disparage capitalism while promoting a dramatic expansion of social-welfare programs funded by ever-escalating taxes:

  • The Center for Economic and Policy Research assertsthat “the welfare state has softened the impact” of “the worst excesses and irrationalities of a market system” and its “injustices.”
  • The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities advocates greater tax expenditures on such assistance programsas Medicaid, the Children’s Health Insurance Program, food stamps, and low-income housing initiatives.
  • The Economic Policy Institutebelieves that “government must play an active role in protecting the economically vulnerable, ensuring equal opportunity, and improving the well-being of all Americans.”
  • The Ella Baker Center for Human Rights was founded by the revolutionary communist Van Jones. This anti-poverty organization claims that “decades of disinvestment in our cities,” coupled with America’s allegedly imperishable racism, have “led to despair and homelessness.”
  • The Emma Lazarus Fund: In 1996 George Soros said he was “appalled” by the recently signed welfare-reform law that empowered states to limit legal immigrants’ access to public assistance. In response to this “mean-spirited attack on immigrants,” he launched an Open Society Institute project known as the Emma Lazarus Fund and endowed it with $50 million.

Organizations that support socialized medicine in the United States:

  • Health Care for America Now (HCAN) is a vast network of organizations supporting, ideally, a “single-payer” model where the federal government would be in charge of financing and administering the entire U.S. healthcare system. During the political debate over “Obamacare” in 2009 and 2010, HCAN’s strategy was to try to achieve such a system incrementally, first by implementing a “public option”—i.e., a government insurance agency to “compete” with private insurers, so that Americans would be “no longer at the mercy of the private insurance industry.” Because such an agency would not need to show a profit in order to remain in business, and because it could tax and regulate its private competitors in whatever fashion it pleased, this “public option” would inevitably force private insurers out of the industry. In August 2009, Soros pledged to give HCAN $5 million to promote its campaign for reform.

Organizations that strive to move American politics to the left by promoting the election of progressive political candidates:

  • Project Vote is the voter-mobilization arm of the notoriously corrupt ACORN, whose voter-registration drives and get-out-the-vote initiatives have been marred by massive levels of fraud and corruption.
  • Catalist seeks“to help progressive organizations realize … electoral success by building and operating a robust national voter database.”
  • The Brennan Center for Justice aims to “fully restore voting rights following criminal conviction”―significant because research shows that ex-felons are far likelier to vote for Democraticpolitical candidates than for Republicans.
  • The Progressive States Network seeksto “pass progressive legislation in all fifty states by providing coordinated research and strategic advocacy tools to forward-thinking state legislators.”
  • The Progressive Change Campaign Committee, to which George Soros personally donated $8,000 in 2010, works “to elect bold progressive candidates to federal office … more often.”

Organizations that promote leftist ideals and worldviews in the media and the arts:

  • The American Prospect, Inc. is the owner and publisher of The American Prospect magazine, which triesto “counteract the growing influence of conservative media.”
  • Free Press is a “media reform” organization co-founded by Robert McChesney, who callsfor “a revolutionary program to overthrow the capitalist system” and to “rebuil[d] the entire society on socialist principles.”
  • The Independent Media Institute aims to “change the world” via projects like AlterNet, an online news magazine calling itself “a key playerin the echo chamber of progressive ideas and vision.”
  • The Nation Institute operates synergistically with the far-left Nation magazine, which works“to extend the reach of progressive ideas” into the American mainstream.
  • The Pacifica Foundation owns and operates Pacifica Radio, awash from its birth with the socialist-Marxist rhetoric of class warfare and anti-capitalism.
  • Media Matters For America: For a number of years, the Open Society Institute gave indirect funding―filtering its grants first through other Soros-backed operations―to this “progressive research and information center” which “monitor[s]” and “correct[s] conservative misinformation in the U.S. media.” In October 2010, Soros announcedthat he would soon donate $1 million directly to Media Matters.
  • Sundance Institute: In 1996, Soros launched his Soros Documentary Fund to produce “social justice” films that would “spur awareness, action and social change.” In 2001, this Fund became part of actor-director Robert Redford’s Sundance Institute. Between 1996 and 2008, OSI earmarked at least $5.2 million for the production of several hundred documentaries, many of which were highly critical of capitalism, American society, or Western culture generally. In 2009, Soros pledged another $5 million to the Sundance Institute.

Organizations that seek to inject the American judicial system with leftist values:

  • The Alliance for Justice consistently depicts Republican judicial nominees as “radical right-wing[ers]” and “extremists” whose views range far outside the boundaries of mainstream public opinion.
  • The American Constitution Society for Law and Policy seeks to indoctrinate young law students to view the Constitution as an evolving or “living” document, and to reject “conservative buzzwords such as ‘originalism‘ and ‘strict construction.’”
  • Justice at Stake promotes legislation that would replace judicial elections with a “merit-selection” system where a small committee of legal elites, unaccountable to the public, would pick those most “qualified” to serve as judges. OSI has spent at least $45.4 million on efforts to change the way judges are chosen in many American states.

Organizations that advance leftist agendas by infiltrating churches and religious congregations:

  • Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good advocatesa brand of “social justice” that would counteract the “greed, materialism, and excessive individualism” that are allegedly inherent in capitalism.
  •  Sojourners characterizes wealth redistribution as the fulfillment of a biblical mandate. Jim Wallis, the founder of this evangelical Christian ministry, has expressed his hope that “more Christians will come to view the world through Marxist eyes.”
  • People Improving Communities through Organizing uses “people of faith” as foot soldiers in its crusade for the “transformation” of “people, institutions, and … our larger culture.”
  • Catholics for Choice―formerly known as Catholics for a Free Choice―is a nominally Catholic organization that “believes in a world where everyone has equal access to … safe and legal abortion services.”

Think tanks that promote leftist policies:

  • The Institute for Policy Studieshas long supported Communist and anti-American causes around the world. It seeks to provide a corrective to the “unrestrained greed” of “markets and individualism.”
  • The New America Foundationtries to influence public opinion on such topics as healthcare, environmentalism, energy policy, and global governance.
  • The Urban Institute favors socialized medicine, expansion of the federal welfare bureaucracy, and tax hikes for higher income-earners.

Organizations that promote open borders, mass immigration, a watering down of current immigration laws, increased rights and benefits for illegal aliens, and ultimately amnesty:

  • The American Immigration Council―formerly known as the the American Immigration Law Foundation―supports “birthright citizenship” for children born to illegal immigrants in the U.S.
  • Casa de Maryland periodically sponsors “know your rights” training sessions to teach illegals how to evade punishment in the event that they are apprehended in an immigration raid.
  • The Immigrant Legal Resource Center belongsto the sanctuary movement that tries to shield illegal aliens from the law.
  • The Migration Policy Instituteadvocates a more permissive U.S. refugee admissions and resettlement policy, as well as more social-welfare benefits for illegals residing in the U.S.
  • LatinoJustice PRLDF is a legal advocacy group that “protectsopportunities for all Latinos … especially the most vulnerable―new immigrants and the poor.”
  • The Immigration Policy Centerstates that “[r]equiring the 10-11 million unauthorized immigrants residing in the U.S. to register with the government and meet eligibility criteria in order to gain legal status is a key element of comprehensive immigration reform.”
  • The National Immigration Forumopposes the enhancement of the U.S. Border Patrol and the construction of a border fence to prevent illegal immigration.
  • The National Immigration Law Center works to help low-income immigrants gain access to government-funded welfare programs on the same basis as legal American citizens.

Organizations that oppose virtually all post-9/11 national-security measures enacted by the U.S. government:

  • The Center for Constitutional Rights, founded by four longtime supporters of communist causes, has condemnedthe “immigration sweeps, ghost detentions, extraordinary rendition, and every other illegal program the government has devised” in response to “the so-called War on Terror.”
  • The National Security Archive Fundcollects and publishes declassified documents (obtained through the Freedom of Information Act) to a degree that compromises American national security and the safety of intelligence agents.
  • The American Civil Liberties Union has depicted the U.S. government’s post-9/11 national-security measures as excessively harsh and invasivegenerally, and also as discriminatory against Muslims in particular. Moreover, the organization has filed numerous lawsuits seeking to limit the government’s ability to locate, monitor, and apprehend terrorist operatives.
  • Human Rights Watch has derided the U.S. war on terror as a foolhardy endeavor rooted in blindness to the realization that terrorism stems, in large measure, from America’s failure “to promote fundamental rights around the world.”

Organizations that defend suspected anti-American terrorists and their abetters:

  • The Constitution Project has supported such notorious figures as Salim Ahmed Hamdan (Osama bin Laden‘s bodyguard and chauffeur) and Jose Padilla (an American Islamic convert and terrorist plotter). Moreover, the Project contends that it is illegal for the U.S. government to detain terror suspects if the evidence against them was obtained through “torture.”
  • The Lynne Stewart Defense Committee was established to support Lynne Stewart, who is a criminal-defense attorney and an America-hating Maoist. Stewart was convicted of illegally helping her incarcerated client, the “blind sheik” Omar Abdel Rahman, pass messages to an Egypt-based Islamic terrorist organization. In September 2002, the Open Society Institute gave $20,000 to this committee; OSI vice president Gara LaMarche characterized Ms. Stewart as a “human rights defender.”

Organizations that depict virtually all American military actions as unwarranted and immoral:

  • Amnesty International: In 2005, this group’s then-executive director William Schulz alleged that the United States had become “a leading purveyor and practitioner” of torture. Irene Khan, who chargedthat the Guantanamo Bay detention center, where the U.S. was housing several hundred captured terror suspects, “has become the gulag of our time.” Schulz’s remarks were echoed by Amnesty’s then-secretary general
  • Global Exchange was founded by Medea Benjamin, a pro-Castro radical who helped establish a project known as Iraq Occupation Watch for the purpose of encouraging widespread desertion by “conscientious objectors” in the U.S. military. In December 2004, Benjamin announced that Global Exchange would be sending aid to the families of terrorist insurgents who were fighting American troops in Iraq.

Organizations that advocate America’s unilateral disarmament and/or a steep reduction in its military spending:

  • The American Friends Service Committee, which views America as the world’s chief source of international strife, has long had a friendly relationship with the Communist Party USA. Lamenting that “the United States spends 59% of the discretionary federal budget on military-related expenses,” the Committee seeks to “realig[n] national spending priorities and to increase the portion of the budget that is spent on housing, quality education for all, medical care, and fair wages.” In 2000, George Soros himself was a signatory to a letter titled “Appeal for Responsible Security” that appeared in The New York Times. The letter called upon the U.S. government “to commit itself unequivocally to negotiate the worldwide reduction and elimination of nuclear weapons,” and to participate in “the global de-alerting of nuclear weapons and deep reduction of nuclear stockpiles.”

Organizations that promote radical environmentalism:

Groups in this category typically oppose mining and logging initiatives, commercial fishing enterprises, development and construction in wilderness areas, the use of coal, the use of pesticides, and oil and gas exploration in “environmentally sensitive” locations. Moreover, they claim that human industrial activity leads to excessive carbon-dioxide emissions which, in turn, cause a potentially cataclysmic phenomenon called “global warming.” Examples of such Soros donees include Earthjustice, Green For All, the Natural Resources Defense Council, the Alliance for Climate Protection, Friends of the Earth, and the Earth Island Institute.

Another major recipient of Soros money is the Tides Foundation, which receives cash from all manner of donors―individuals, groups, and other foundations―and then funnels it to designated left-wing recipients. Having given more than $400 million to “progressive nonprofit organizations” since 2000, Tides is a heavy backer of environmental organizations, though its philanthropy extends also into many other areas.

Organizations that oppose the death penalty in all circumstances:

In 2000, George Soros co-signed a letter to President Bill Clinton asking for a moratorium on the death penalty, on grounds that it tended to be implemented disproportionately against black and Hispanic offenders.

Consistent with the billionaire’s opposition to capital punishment, his Open Society Institute has given millions of dollars to anti-death penalty organizations such as New Yorkers Against the Death Penalty, Witness to Innocence, Equal Justice USA, the Death Penalty Information Center, People of Faith against the Death Penalty, and the Fair Trial Initiative.

Organizations that promote modern-day feminism’s core tenetthat America is fundamentally a sexist society where discrimination and violence against women have reached epidemic proportions:

  • The Feminist Majority Foundation“focus[es] on advancing the legal, social and political equality of women with men, countering the backlash to women’s advancement, and recruiting and training young feminists…”
  • The Ms. Foundation for Women lamentsthat although “women are more than half the [U.S.] population … they don’t have equal opportunity, voice or power.”
  • The National Partnership for Women and Families asserts that “women today are still paid only $0.77 to a man’s dollar”an assertion that is grossly misleading and substantively untrue.

Organizations that promote not only women’s right to taxpayer-funded abortion on demand, but also political candidates who take that same position:


Organizations that favor global government which would bring American foreign policy under the control of the United Nations or other international bodies:

According to George Soros, “[W]e need some global system of political decision-making. In short, we need a global society to support our global economy.” Consistent with this perspective, the Open Society Institute in 2008 gave $150,000 to the United Nations Foundation, which “works to broaden support for the UN through advocacy and public outreach.” Moreover, OSI is considered a “major” funder of the Coalition for an International Criminal Court, which aims to subordinate American criminal-justice procedures in certain cases to an international prosecutor who could initiate capricious or politically motivated prosecutions of U.S. officials and military officers.

Organizations that support drug legalization:

Dismissing the notion of “a drug-free America” as nothing more than “a utopian dream,” George Soros says that “the war on drugs” is “insane” and, “like the Vietnam War,” simply “cannot be won.” “I’ll tell you what I would do if it were up to me,” says Soros. “I would establish a strictly controlled distribution network through which I would make most drugs, excluding the most dangerous ones like crack, legally available.” In 1998 Soros was a signatory to a public letter addressed to United Nations Secretary General Kofi Annan, declaring that “the global war on drugs is now causing more harm than drug abuse itself.” The letter blamed the war on drugs for impeding such public-health efforts as stemming the spread of HIV, hepatitis, and other infectious diseases, as well as human-rights violations and the perpetration of environmental assaults. Other notable signers included Peter Lewis, Tammy Baldwin, Rev. William Sloan Coffin, Jr., Walter Cronkite, Morton H. Halperin, Kweisi Mfume, and Cornel West.

Soros and his Open Society Institute have given many millions of dollars to groups supporting drug-legalization and needle-exchange programs. In 1996, former Carter administration official Joseph Califano called Soros “the Daddy Warbucks of drug legalization.” According to a Capital Research Center publication, “It’s no exaggeration to say that without Soros there would be no serious lobby against the drug war.” 

A leading recipient of Soros funding is the Drug Policy Alliance (DPA), which seeks to loosen narcotics laws, promotes “treatment-not-incarceration” policies for non-violent drug offenders, and advocates syringe-access programs “to help prevent the spread of HIV/AIDS.” Soros himself formerly sat on the DPA board of directors. As recently as 2010, Soros contributed $1 million to support a California ballot measure known as Proposition 19, which would have legalized personal marijuana use in the state; the measure, however, was rejected by voters on election day.

Peter Schweizer, author of Do As I Say (Not As I Do), speculates on the possible reasons underlying Soros’s support for drug legalization:

“One very possible answer is that he hopes to profit from them [drugs] once they become legal. He has been particularly active in South America, buying up large tracts of land and forging alliances with those in a position to mass-produce narcotics should they become legalized in the United States. He has also helped fund the Andean Council of Coca Leaf producers. Needless to say, this organization would stand to benefit enormously from the legalization of cocaine. He has also taken a 9 percent stake in Banco de Colombia, located in the Colombian drug capital of Cali. The Drug Enforcement Administration has speculated that the bank is being used to launder money and that Soros’s fellow shareholders may be members of a major drug cartel.”

Organizations that support euthanasia for the terminally ill:

Soros has long promoted the cause of physician-assisted suicide in an effort to change public attitudes about death. Toward that end, in 1994 he began giving money to the (now defunct) Project on Death in America (PDA), whose purpose was to provide “end-of-life” assistance for ailing people and to enact public policy that will “transform the culture and experience of dying and bereavement.” In 2000, the Open Society Institute pledged $15 million to PDA over a three-year period.

Notably, PDA’s mission was congruent with the goals of those who support government-run health care, which invariably features bureaucracies tasked with allocating scarce resources and thus determining who will, and who will not, be eligible for particular medications and treatments. Such bureaucracies generally make their calculations based upon cost-benefit analyses of a variety of possible treatments. Ultimately these decisions tend to disfavor the very old and the very sick, because whatever benefits they might gain from expensive interventions are likely to be of short duration, and thus are not judged to be worth the costs. Soros himself has suggested that “[a]ggressive, life-prolonging interventions, which may at times go against the patient’s wishes, are much more expensive than proper care for the dying.” Additional pro-euthanasia groups funded by Soros and OSI are the following:

  • The Death with Dignity National Center seeks to allow “terminally ill individuals meeting stringent safeguards to hasten their own deaths” by way of lethal drug prescriptions.
  • The Compassion in Dying Federation of America advocates “aid-in-dying for terminally ill, mentally competent adults.”

Organizations that have pressured mortgage lenders to make loans to undercapitalized borrowers, a practice that helped spark the subprime mortgage crisis and housing-market collapse of 2008:

  • The Greenlining Institute―by threatening to publicly accuse banks of racially discriminatory lending practices―has successfully negotiated loan commitments of more than $2.4 trillion from America’s financial institutions.
  • The Center for Responsible Lending, according to Americans for Prosperity vice president Phil Kerpen, has “shak[en] down and harass[ed] banks into making bad loans to unqualified borrowers.”

The Open Society Institute is not the only vehicle by which George Soros works to reshape America’s political landscape. Indeed, Soros was the prime mover in the creation of the so-called “Shadow Democratic Party,” or “Shadow Party,” in 2003. This term refers to a nationwide network of labor unions, non-profit activist groups, and think tanks whose agendas are ideologically to the left, and which are engaged in campaigning for the Democrats. This network’s activities include fundraising, get-out-the-vote drives, political advertising, opposition research, and media manipulation.

The Shadow Party was conceived and organized principally by George Soros, Hillary Clinton and Harold McEwan Ickes — all identified with the Democratic Party left. Other key players included:

To develop the Shadow Party as a cohesive entity, Harold Ickes undertook the task of building a 21st-century version of the Left’s traditional alliance of the “oppressed” and “disenfranchised.” By the time Ickes was done, he had created or helped to create six new groups, and had co-opted a seventh called MoveOn.org. Together, these seven groups constituted the administrative core of the newly formed Shadow Party:

These organizations, along with the many leftist groups with which they collaborate, have played a major role in helping Soros advance his political and social agendas.

According to Richard Poe, co-author (with David Horowitz) of the 2006 book The Shadow Party:

“The Shadow Party is the real power driving the Democrat machine. It is a network of radicals dedicated to transforming our constitutional republic into a socialist hive. The leader of these radicals is … George Soros. He has essentially privatized the Democratic Party, bringing it under his personal control. The Shadow Party is the instrument through which he exerts that control…. It works by siphoning off hundreds of millions of dollars in campaign contributions that would have gone to the Democratic Party in normal times, and putting those contributions at the personal disposal of Mr. Soros. He then uses that money to buy influence and loyalty where he sees fit. In 2003, Soros set up a network of privately-owned groups which acts as a shadow or mirror image of the Party. It performs all the functions we would normally expect the real Democratic Party to perform, such as shaping the Party platform, fielding candidates, running campaigns, and so forth.  However, it performs these functions under the private supervision of Mr. Soros and his associates. The Shadow Party derives its power from its ability to raise huge sums of money.  By controlling the Democrat purse strings, the Shadow Party can make or break any Democrat candidate by deciding whether or not to fund him. During the 2004 election cycle, the Shadow Party raised more than $300 million for Democrat candidates, prompting one of its operatives, MoveOn PAC director Eli Pariser, to declare, ‘Now it’s our party.  We bought it, we own it…'”

The Messiah’s Henchmen…… obama’s Unelected, Unaccountable, Radical Extremist Czars


[TWG Note:  WHY aren’t Americans everywhere SCREAMING about this treasonous regime?    Van Jones is no longer a “czar” so to speak, he is still VERY involved with the obama regime.]

 

(Hat Tip Lyle B. for the forward.  Thanks, Lyle)

 

If you have doubts Obama is a biased, bigoted, Marxist lunatic.  Just look at this herd of his self appointed helpers. (How many Marxists/socialists do YOU know? What are the odds he would know and appoint so many without being one himself???)

OBAMA’S CZARS
 
 

There are very few of us who know just what all of Obama’s Czars do, as they quietly go about their “work” in the nation’s capital. This listing of their names and job descriptions should be educational to all Americans, no matter what your political leaning. See who they are and realize what they want to do:

 

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-MnBQvEgQ-_k/Tq3NYGF7VAI/AAAAAAAAM1I/Vnp51nznrFc/s1600/CZARS_01_richard_holbrooke.jpg

Richard Holbrooke – Afghanistan Czar
Ultra liberal anti-gun former Governor Of  New Mexico . Pro-Abortion and pro- drug legalization. Wants to dissolve the 2nd Amendment


http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-GBqIyRaef9Q/Tq3OGlJGkPI/AAAAAAAAM1U/nfhMtYtwEUc/s1600/CZARS_02_Ed_Montgomery.jpg

Ed Montgomery – Auto recovery Czar
Radical anti-business black activist. Affirmative Action and Job Preference for blacks.  University  of  Maryland Business School Dean ; teaches that  US  business has caused world poverty. ACORN board member. Communist DuBois Club member.


http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-iNvsncXzKAI/Tq3PJsQ4TII/AAAAAAAAM1g/leb8R6q1MVo/s1600/CZAR_03_Jeffrey_Crowley.JPG

Jeffrey Crowley – AIDS Czar
Radical Homosexual. Gay Rights activist. Believes in Gay Marriage and a Special Status for homosexuals only, including complete free health care for gays.


http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-65yYGm6cZOo/Tq3ZhqxYC0I/AAAAAAAAM7c/0tQnd28fz9U/s1600/CZARS_04_Alan_Bersin.jpg

Alan Bersin – Border Czar
The former failed superintendent of  San Diego . Ultra-Liberal friend of Hillary Clinton. Served as Border Czar under Janet Reno – to keep borders open to illegals without interference from the Federal government.


http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-WJaohNPbu-M/Tq3bU4rA5UI/AAAAAAAAM7o/ex74o-dzPAM/s1600/CZARS_05_David_Hayes.jpg

David J. Hayes – California Water Czar
Senior Fellow of radical environmentalist group “Progress Policy”. No training or experience in water management whatsoever.


http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-TvRLRpM1ceY/Tq3c1vaxa_I/AAAAAAAAM70/ZTVYZSwQE_o/s1600/CZARS_06_Ron_Bloom.jpg

Ron Bloom – Car Czar
Auto Union worker. Anti- business & anti- nuclear. Has worked hard to force  US  auto makers out of business. Sits on the Board of Chrysler which is now Union-owned. How did this happen?


http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-JC1GxRj6JcM/Tq3dsC6AlkI/AAAAAAAAM8A/G0JrSeQR6NQ/s1600/CZARS_07_Dennis_Ross.jpg

Dennis Ross – Central Region Czar
Believes  US  policy is the cause of war in the  Middle East . Obama apologist to the world. Anti-gun and completely Pro-Abortion.


http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-CvWljRu8ySg/Tq3gErWyl-I/AAAAAAAAM8M/1ysl9hkKPj0/s1600/CZARS_07_Lynn+Rosenthal.png

Lynn Rosenthal – Domestic Violence Czar
Director of the National Network to End Domestic Violence. Vicious anti-male feminist. Supports male castration – imagine?


http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-hNBfrXjhhn8/Tq3h__AGvJI/AAAAAAAAM8Y/5KvQ7-hADUM/s1600/CZARS_08_Gil+Kerlikowske.jpg

Gil Kerlikowske – Drug Czar
Devoted lobbyist for every restrictive gun law proposal, former Chief of Police in liberal  Seattle   WA . Believes no American should own a firearm. Supports legalization of all drugs.


http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-P_Y-M657a0I/Tq3i9WqT0sI/AAAAAAAAM8k/9oCn2XoDNjM/s1600/CZARS_09_Paul_Volcker.jpg

Paul Volcker – Economic Czar
Former head of the Federal Reserve under Jimmy Carter when  US  economy nearly failed. Obama-appointed head of the Economic Recovery Advisory Board which engineered the Obama economic disaster to  US  economy. Member of anti-business “Progressive Policy” organization.


http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-DpkkKLkfXoM/Tq3jpeLX0DI/AAAAAAAAM8w/-Oqwx0W8tEA/s1600/CZARS_10_Carol_Browner.jpg

Carol Browner – Energy and Environment Czar
Political Radical. Former head of the EPA – known for anti-business activism. Strong anti-gun ownership..


http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-Zqrw8CTrzYw/Tq3k4JTOWSI/AAAAAAAAM88/mjKn8O3YfgU/s1600/CZARS_11_Joshua_DuBois.jpg

Joshua DuBois – Faith-Based Czar
Political Black activist. Degree in Black Nationalism. Anti-gun ownership lobbyist. WHAT THE HELL DOES A FAITH BASED CZAR DO ? ? ?


http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-DuTpSa2JKuU/Tq3nzpSpxZI/AAAAAAAAM9g/lpvo17RKf3w/s1600/CZARS_12A_Cameron_Davis.jpg

Cameron Davis – Great Lakes Czar
Chicago  radical anti-business environmentalist. Blames George Bush for “Poisoning the water that minorities have to drink.” No experience or training in water management whatsoever. Former ACORN Board member (what does that tell us?)


http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-U7h9mO4aRIc/Tq3ofg2mEeI/AAAAAAAAM9s/DcwczBHiu54/s1600/CZARS_13_Van_Jones.gif

Van Jones – Green Jobs Czar
(since resigned). Black activist with strong anti-white views. Member of American Communist Party and  San Francisco  Communist Party. Said George Bush caused the 9-11 attacks and wanted Bush investigated by the  World Court  for war crimes.


http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-MPwYYeQP_Vk/Tq3qWwVPChI/AAAAAAAAM94/-g50_OpB17k/s1600/CZARS_14_Daniel_Fried.jpg

Daniel Fried – Guantanamo Closure Czar
Human Rights activist for Foreign Terrorists. Believes  America  has caused the Global War on Terrorism. Believes terrorists have rights above and beyond Americans.


http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-Q_pOyNR0B3g/Tq3rdWy2JtI/AAAAAAAAM-E/CG1cvhtXQe0/s1600/CZARS_14_Nancy_Ann_Deparle.jpg

Nancy-Ann DeParle – Health Czar
Former head of Medicare / Medicaid. Strong proponent of Healthcare Rationing (i.e. “Death Panels”). She is married to a reporter for The New York Times.


http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-zL_gn5TZ-co/Tq3wdTcakEI/AAAAAAAAM-Q/tmQASDmj0Ho/s1600/CZARS_15_vivek_kundra.jpg

Vivek Kundra – Information Czar
Born in  New Delhi, India . Controls all public information, including labels and news releases. Monitors all private Internet emails. (HELLO?)


http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-9I4t58f3n4A/Tq3xCaUkF3I/AAAAAAAAM-c/VnkzPD0NmIM/s1600/CZARS_16_Todd+Stern.jpg

Todd Stern – International Climate Czar
Anti-business former White House Chief of Staff. Strong supporter of the  Kyoto  Accord; pushing hard for Cap and Trade. Blames US business for Global warming.  Anti-US business prosperity.


http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-KWcu3ohIOms/Tq34tmInZrI/AAAAAAAAM-o/-L-9dJQOw0M/s1600/CZARS_17_Dennis_Blair.jpg

Dennis Blair – Intelligence Czar
Retired US Navy. Stopped  US  guided missile program he described as “provocative”. Chair of ultra-Liberal “Council on Foreign Relations” which blames American organizations for regional wars.


http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-4CNJFSOVA2Q/Tq35ItnnrUI/AAAAAAAAM-0/_dg8ixSyqs4/s1600/CZARS_18_George_Mitchell.jpg

George Mitchell – Mideast Peace Czar
Fmr. Sen from  Maine  Left wing radical. Has said  Israel  should be split up into “2 or 3 ” smaller more manageable plots”. (God forbid) A true Anti-nuclear anti-gun & pro homosexual “special rights” advocate.


http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-YUDYIJ5yneQ/Tq35izZ7WeI/AAAAAAAAM_A/xG9BpVNPYR0/s1600/CZARS_19_kenneth_feinberg.jpg

Kenneth Feinberg – Pay Czar
Chief of Staff to Ted Kennedy. Lawyer who got rich off the 9-11 victims payoffs (horribly true).


http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-zrPp1b9ltiI/Tq36HBqrbfI/AAAAAAAAM_M/VdLBpudwcHI/s1600/CZARS_20_Cass_Sunstein.jpg

Cass Sunstein – Regulatory Czar
Liberal activist judge who believes free speech needs to be limited for the “common good”; essentially against the 1st Amendment. Has ruled against personal freedoms many times on private gun ownership and right to free speech cases. This guy has to be run out of Washington  ! ! !


http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-CbmOnWWNrps/Tq37FpB96TI/AAAAAAAAM_Y/s7X1gYGAQ88/s1600/CZARS_21_John_Holdren.jpg

John Holdren – Science Czar
Fierce ideological environmentalist, Sierra Club anti-business activist. Claims US business has caused world poverty. No Science training.


http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-lRnFRNAp1Xs/Tq37wzgGTeI/AAAAAAAAM_k/-JEcQShklDw/s1600/CZARS_22_Earl_Devaney.JPG

Earl Devaney – Stimulus Accountability Czar
Spent career trying to take guns away from American citizens. Believes in Open Borders to Mexico . Author of statement blaming US gun stores for drug war in Mexico.


http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-Q_BP0xPZop4/Tq38YpaPKHI/AAAAAAAAM_w/N6k-mbaoYQE/s1600/CZARS_23_J_Scott+Gration.jpg

J. Scott Gration – Sudan Czar
Native of Democratic  Republic of Congo.  Believes US does little to help Third World  countries. Council of foreign relations, asking for higher US taxes to support United Nations.


http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-Ckl-aN52MB0/Tq39Ym5qAyI/AAAAAAAAM_8/c_sAAiCzRRQ/s1600/CZARS_24_Herb_Allison.jpg

Herb Allison – TARP Czar
Fannie Mae CEO responsible for the US recession by using real estate mortgages to back up the US stock market. Caused millions of people to lose their life savings.


http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-CxiUUDD9hNM/Tq3-RgktaRI/AAAAAAAANAI/In0CwWnPG0w/s1600/CZARS_25_John_Brennan.jpg

John Brennan – Terrorism Czar
Anti CIA activist. No training in diplomatic or gov. affairs. Believes Open Borders to Mexico and a dialog with terrorists and has suggested Obama disband US military A TOTAL MORON !!!!!

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-RgbtksyjTsg/Tq3-15K4_rI/AAAAAAAANAU/FAW6s_U4wEc/s1600/CZARS_26_Aneesh_Chopra.jpg

Aneesh Chopra – Technology Czar
No Technology training. Worked for the Advisory Board Company, a health care think tank for hospitals. Anti-doctor activist. Supports Obama Healthcare Rationing (i.e. Death Panels) and salaried doctors working exclusively for the Government Healthcare plan.


http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-bw8j2uYZTnE/Tq3_s-v7SlI/AAAAAAAANAg/nn1wizrwjLo/s1600/CZARS_27_Adolfo_Carrion_Jr.jpg

Adolfo Carrion Jr. – Urban Affairs Czar
Puerto Rico-born Anti-American activist and leftist group member in Latin America. Millionaire “slum lord” of Bronx, NY. Owns many lavish homes and condos which he got from “sweetheart” deals with labor unions. Wants higher taxes on middle class to pay for minority housing and healthcare.


http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-hK4hMkpXu_I/Tq4AUi5-3eI/AAAAAAAANAs/4KZxjxcKpwQ/s1600/CZARS_28_Ashton_Carter.jpg

Ashton Carter – Weapons Czar
Leftist. Wants all private weapons in US destroyed. Supports UN ban on firearms ownership in  America . No Other “policy”.


http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-mw-hJyAoLC0/Tq4AyCKDw5I/AAAAAAAANA4/xEEaRhrBFAY/s1600/CZARS_29_Gary_Samore.jpg

Gary Samore – WMD Policy Czar
Former US Communist. Wants US to destroy all WMD unilaterally as a show of good faith. Has no other “policy”.


These are the people who are helping President Obama run our country.

 

Czars = $8,100,000 in salary and benefits
Travel= $4,000,000
Private Office for Czars=$2,400,000
Staff = $18,900,000 for salaries and benefits
Office space for staff=$2,400,000
Office supplies=$960,000
Travel for (2) staff=$4,000,000
Here
s the total bill all you nice folks who pay taxes are footing for King Barack the Milds Czars:
$40,760,000 and in case you need help reading that, it
s 40 million 760 thousand dollars and it doesnt include limo services, gym memberships and so on…
Now, fellow business owners, tear the above apart. Find the flaws, the missing pieces, and let
s start spreading the news about what the Kings Courtiers are costing us.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Occupy Wall Street (by Thomas Sowell)

April 18, 2012 8 comments

Thomas Sowell

Occupy Wall Street by Thomas Sowell

By Dr. Thomas Sowell
 
The current Occupy Wall Street movement is the best illustration to date of what President Barack Obama’s America looks like. It is an America where the lawless, unaccomplished, ignorant and incompetent rule. It is an America where those who have sacrificed nothing pillage and destroy the lives of those who have sacrificed greatly.
 
 
It is an America where history is rewritten to honor dictators, murderers and thieves. It is an America where violence, racism, hatred, class warfare and of murder are all promoted as acceptable means of overturning the American civil society.
 
 
It is an America where humans have been degraded to the level of animals: of defecating in public, having sex in public, devoid of basic hygiene. It is an America where the basic tenets of a civil society, including faith, family, a free press and individual rights, have been always rejected. It is an America where our founding documents have been now shredded and, with them, every person’s guaranteed liberties.
 
 
It is an America where, ultimately, great suffering will come to the American people, but the rulers like Obama, Michelle Obama, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, Joe Biden, Jesse Jackson, Louis Farrakhan, liberal college professors, union bosses and all other loyal liberal/Communist Party members will live in opulent splendor.
 
 
It is the America that Obama and the Democrat Party have now created with all the willing assistance of the American media, Hollywood , unions, universities, the Communist Party of America, the Black Panthers and numerous anti-American foreign entities.
 
 
Barack Obama has brought more destruction upon this country in three years than any other event in the history of our nation, but it is just the beginning of what he and his comrades are capable of.
 
 
The Occupy Wall Street movement is just another step in their plan for the annihilation of America .
 
 
“Socialism, in general, has a record of failure that’s so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it.”
 
 
Dr. Thomas Sowell (A National Humanities Medal
Winner)
 
[TWG Note: For a JAW DROPPING look at the organizations orchestrating and financing the OWS efforts, take a look at the list here: https://twg2a.wordpress.com/2011/11/01/who-is-behind-ows/]
 
 
The problems we face today are there because the people who work for a living are out numbered by the people that vote for a living.
 

JPFO: Why most of the world hates our Second Amendment

April 13, 2012 2 comments

 

April 11th 2012
Why most of the world hates our Second Amendment
U.N. “Peacekeepers”
Most of the citizenry of the world has been psychologically castrated regarding self defense and personal firearms. Only Switzerland comes ANYWHERE NEAR our American Second Amendment.

The Italians have a saying about beautiful women: “What you can’t have? Hate.” Envy is a vile poison in the human spirit. Most of the world envies America, despite all our foibles. Most of the world CAN NOT have what we have. And so they hate us.

We can stand firm and defeat the vermin, or we can let them get a foot in the door. You decide.  Read More HERE at the JPFO website.

Additional Reading about  “The Origins Of Envy”  The socialist frame of mind and what our children in the public “school” system are being brainwashed to feel…..

 

%d bloggers like this: