Archive

Posts Tagged ‘united nations’

Ted Turner: “I think it’s GOOD that Veterans are killing themselves.”

October 25, 2012 7 comments

Racist Eugenics Freak, obama supporter, CNN founder, marxist and NWO globalist thinks it’s GOOD that our Military are committing suicide.  Ted Turner “lives” in Montana……. He and jane fonda make the perfect couple. Even though they split, they are still best Friends. I have no doubt, since they share the same vile ideas.

 

Agenda 21 & ICLEI A Horrendous Crime Against Humanity

October 15, 2012 17 comments

[TWG: I couldn’t believe my eyes when I saw this story on yahoo news today.  The mainstream media has done everything they can to hide this scandal.  Agenda 21 IS TREASON and it is evil to it’s very core.  Far too many people have no idea what this is and what it means for property rights, American Sovereignty and humanity as a whole.  If you’re not involved in fighting this treasonous effort, PLEASE get involved at your local level and find out where your city and county council members are focusing their efforts.  Following this article, I’ve included a white paper written by Karen Sweetland, who has worked diligently on fighting this massive conspiracy.  PLEASE learn what this is about and do your part to fight it locally within your own city/county council and State Government.]

 

Tea Party versus Agenda 21: Saving the U.S. or just irking it?

By Nick Carey | Reuters

CEDAR FALLS, Iowa (Reuters) – Tea Party activist Judd Saul admits that he can sound a little unhinged when he gets talking about an issue close to his heart that most Americans have never heard of.

“Agenda 21 is an elusive enemy that floats in and chokes you gradually,” said Saul, of the Cedar Valley Tea Party in Cedar Falls, Iowa. “They want to destroy the middle-class way of life.”

“Agenda 21 aims to undermine your property rights and force you” to live in cities, Jake Robinson told Tea Party members at a meeting in Murfreesboro, Tennessee, in April.

For Joe Dugan, leader of the Myrtle Beach Tea Party in South Carolina, “Agenda 21 is nothing short of treason.”

If you don’t know what Agenda 21 is, you’re not alone – only about 15 percent of Americans do. It is a nonbinding U.N. resolution signed by more than 170 world leaders (including Republican U.S. President George H.W. Bush) at the 1992 Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro as a way to promote sustainable development in the face of a rapidly growing global population.

A small percentage of Americans say it is an attack on their very existence – part of a grand conspiracy to take away their gun rights, destroy suburbia and turn America into a modern-day Soviet state.

At a local level across the country, conservative activists linked to the Tea Party movement have rallied around the cause of blocking development they say is part of the conspiracy.

Kim Simac, a member of the Northwoods Patriots in northern Wisconsin, believes a local sustainable development plan will shut down her horse-riding school because her business takes up more land than the plan allows for. Heather Gass says she has been fighting sustainable development plans in the San Francisco area that she says will include hefty road tolls and deliberately drive up gas prices “because they want to force us out of our cars.”

“It sounds crazy, but it’s true,” she added.

Activists dislike the use of multi-unit apartment buildings in city plans – which they call “stack ’em and pack ’em” units – as well as bike lanes and other zoning restrictions they say impinge upon the value of their property and rights.

“Property ownership is the essence of the American dream and a cornerstone of the American economy,” said John Anthony, a conservative small business owner in New Jersey who has devoted a lot of time to studying Agenda 21. “When you diminish property values, you shrink the net worth of the entire middle class.”

Republicans at the state level have passed or tried to pass laws aimed at Agenda 21 and the International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI), an international association of local governments. ICLEI was formed in 1990, and its promotion of sustainable development at the local government level has made it synonymous with Agenda 21 to Tea Party opponents. Activists have gone after the ICLEI in their attacks and the group has lost 29 U.S. members as a result.

This summer, Alabama passed a property rights bill targeting Agenda 21, which was signed by Governor Robert Bentley – his office did not respond to a request for comment. Anti-Agenda 21 resolutions were also passed in Kansas and New Hampshire.

Campaigners managed to persuade the Republican National Committee to pass a resolution on the “destructive and insidious” plan being “covertly pushed into local communities,” and the party’s 2012 platform approved in August stated: “We strongly reject the U.N. Agenda 21 as erosive of American sovereignty.”

AND YET…

After all that, things have gone a bit quiet. The issue barely registers in the presidential election campaign, and the Republican National Committee did not respond to a request for a comment.

At a local level, there are signs of a backlash.

A June poll of 1,300 U.S. voters commissioned by the American Planning Association found that when asked whether they supported or opposed U.N. Agenda 21, 85 percent of respondents said they did not know enough to form an opinion. Nine percent supported Agenda 21, 6 percent opposed it.

“I think the Tea Party people who turn up to shout at planning meetings are heading for a McCarthy moment,” said Ron Littlefield, the mayor of Chattanooga, Tennessee, referring to the Communist witch hunts of Wisconsin Senator Joseph McCarthy in the 1950s.

“They have been heard, and many people are sick of their scare tactics,” added the mayor, whom local Tea Party activists have been trying to recall for raising property taxes.

Don Knapp, U.S. spokesman for the ICLEI, rejected the notion of an anti-American plot. “Sustainable development is not a top-down conspiracy from the U.N., but a bottom-up push from local governments,” he said.

An anti-sustainable development bill in Arizona died this spring when the Arizona Chamber of Commerce successfully lobbied against it, arguing it was vague and could drive away corporations that have embraced sustainable development.

“We thought this was a wrongheaded approach,” said chamber spokesman Garrick Taylor. “It would be bad for business.”

Many conservatives also vehemently disagree with the global warming arguments behind Agenda 21. But planners and developers say sustainable development plans are needed to meet future shifts in the size and age of the U.S. population.

According to U.S. Census Bureau projections, America’s population should grow by more than 40 percent by 2050 to 440 million, requiring millions of new housing units. Demographers and developers also warn that as baby boomers start turning 70 in 2016 and seek to downsize their homes, there will be a spike in demand for multi-apartment buildings in walkable areas.

“What I want to hear from opponents of sustainable development is where are you going to put 50 million new housing units over the next few decades?” said Mitchell Silver, head of planning for Raleigh, North Carolina, who is also president of the American Planning Association (APA). “So far, I haven’t gotten an answer to that question.”

Another problem some Tea Party activists acknowledge is that few local officials have heard of Agenda 21. This was the case in Garland, Texas, during a debate on the city’s strategic plan. Anti-Agenda 21 activists objected to bike lanes, efforts to determine what types of businesses to allow into Garland and any reference to “sustainable development.”

“We found if we mentioned Agenda 21, our officials’ eyes would glaze over,” said Katrina Pierson of the Garland Tea Party. “So we focused on parts of the plan we didn’t like.”

Her group managed to have significant portions of the city plan changed and got Garland to quit its membership in the ICLEI.

Judd Saul was not so successful when he went to battle against Cedar Falls 2020, the city’s development plan. Saul says his studies of Agenda 21 began after he discovered that the requirement to have a lockbox at the back door of his family’s restaurant containing keys for emergency service access to his property was “based on international fire regulations.”

Saul says that rather than taking on the parts of Cedar Falls 2020 he disliked most, he focused instead on Agenda 21 at a public meeting to discuss the plan. As almost no one in attendance knew what he was talking about, Saul says his words met with blank stares.

“I wish I’d focused on why the plan was bad,” he said, “instead of talking about Agenda 21 and looking like a wacko nut job.”

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/tea-party-versus-agenda-21-saving-u-just-050156332.html

 

Here’s information on Agenda 21 and ICLEI.   It’s lengthy, but PLEASE take some time to familiarize yourself with it and to get involved at your local level.

 

AGENDA 21 ICLEI

Written By Karen Sweetland

This is a very concise overview regarding the encroachment of our rights as outlined in Agenda 21.

Unfortunately the majority of Americans are totally unaware of this treasonous  movement. Private property owners should be especially aware of Agenda 21.  For those of you in the know, this is good reference material…..

Agenda 21 is too big, too complicated to condense into a couple of paragraphs.  I have taken copious notes and reduced it all to the following information, and am sending under separate email the explosive PDF file on the APA war against Agenda21 opposition – it is well laid out, sophisticated, comprehensive, well funded and national in scope.  To date I do not believe there is a single organization in the country that has assumed a counterpart position with even remotely similar clarity of purpose and modeling.  The information below is so vital, so urgent, so massive it should be a major part of ANY candidate’s campaign – as a means of educating the public and reflecting a serious dedication to Constitutional principles and laws.

You may share this, but I would ask that I be given credit for authoring this information whenever and wherever it is used.

I have many months of research into this topic.  This can be regarded as one of my “white papers” with others forthcoming.  I am willing to give presentations and/or training on this topic, be it to candidates, current legislators, patriot or political groups.

AGENDA 21

An overview by Karen Sweetland
February 22, 2012

What is Agenda 21? It is a United Nation’s program presented and approved in Rio in 1992. At that time American conservatives laughed it off.
“This is too crazy,” they said. “Impossible. It will never happen. Not here!”
Well, it is happening. It is happening here and it is happening now. Agenda 21
is a totalitarian comprehensive environmental program that, when fully
implemented, will direct where you live, how much water you can use, and how, when and where you can travel.

Agenda 21 is being marketed as a worldwide effort to ensure that all human
beings will have access to adequate housing, health care, water and food. Of
course this will require a massive redistribution of wealth from prosperous
countries to poorer countries. Predictably, capitalistic countries, like the
United States, will of necessity suffer seriously lowered standards of
living.

It’s noteworthy that Presidents George H. Bush, Bill Clinton, and Barack Obama, through Executive Orders, have signed onto
Agenda 21. Hundreds more governors, mayors, and county commissioners have also signed on.  There
presently over 600 cities, counties and states in America signed on to Agenda 21.

Agenda 21 and related programs will eliminate many things we hold dear. These have been declared
“unsustainable” and will be abolished. Here are some of them:

All private property rights (property ownership)[no one will be allowed to own land, houses or other
property]
All forms of irrigation, pesticides & commercial fertilizer
Livestock production and most meat consumption [lab produced ‘meat’ currently in development in Europe – from stem cells].
Privately owned vehicles and personal travel [no individually owned autos]
Use of fossil fuels for power generation or mechanized travel
Single family homes [everyone will have to
live in stack-and-pack hi-rise condos called ‘sustainable
communities’ – multi-use high rises in each city – most of which already have them and are building more]
Most forms of mineral extraction and timber harvesting
Human population must be reduced to fewer than 1 billion people
[The current 6 billion population to be reduced
to 500 million, i.e. the world must be DEPOPULATED! – one can only wonder
just how the powers behind this plan to decrease the population by 5/6th ] – Obamacare factors into the US depopulation,
from denial of treatment, birth control and abortions.

It’s not coming from Washington D.C. or state legislatures for the most part.
It is seeping in through local city and county governments.
Agenda 21 brings with it stealthy code words, comforting words such as
“smart growth,” “social justice,” “bio-diversity,” and “sustained development.”
You will hear them often and find them in abundance in most actions of city/town governments.

Translated these terms effectively mean total environmental
dictatorship and the elevation of the pagan practice of the worship of Mother Earth. Not a
joke.

179 countries, including the United
States, initially signed on to the Agenda in 1992. Many more
have joined since then.   Check out your own state/city – chances are that it is already
firmly entrenched in Agenda 21. http://www.iclei.org/index.php?id=11454

The ICLEI is the governing body under the United Nations – and the above link lists ALL participating countries
and cities therein – you will be shocked to see the LONG list of US cities – it is staggering, just
staggering and mind boggling, shocking, dismaying and downright scary.

Agenda 21 is designed to control every aspect of human life on every
square inch of planet earth. As a biblical worldview dims in the world,
man falls to the bottom of the food chain.

If Agenda 21 succeeds (and it is) animals will become more important than man as will
plants and trees. We can already see ample evidence of this process in motion
today. Agenda 21’s real message is: “Man is the problem. Nature must be
preserved and take precedence. Mother Earth must not be scratched.“

Agenda 21 is just another attempt by man to recreate heaven on earth. David
Chilton, in his insightful book Paradise Restored, presents an
important historical dynamic. Chilton submits that man, ever since he was
expelled from Eden, has tried to get back in. Each time he tries, he creates
another hell on earth. Agenda 21 will be no different.

Many socialistic, communistic, and liberal organizations and international
leaders are behind Agenda 21 and its related programs, most notably Bilderberg.  It will take dedication
of time and effort on our part to truly understand all the implications of this
pervasive program. The investment of time and effort will be worth it – equal to basic survival.

These are not legal or dictionary definitions, but short explanations used to describe words as they are used within the Agenda 21 context.

Bill of Rights: US Constitutional rights that reflect natural law , deemed unalienable- we are born with these rights, they cannot be taken away. Conversely, Human Rights are granted to people under the Declaration of Human Rights. Under this system the government can take these rights away to advance a centrally determined “common good”.

Biodiversity: The dictionary defines it as a variety of plants and animals in their native environments/habitats. It is used by globalists to promote fear around extinction of species so that they can activate the Endangered Species Act which has yet to have a single success! It is used as a weapon to abolish private property.  (prime example of the destruction of the Imperial Valley in California, where water was turned off to the farmlands and ranches, turning the entire area into a dustbowl, with massive loss of jobs, land, wealth – in the name of a tiny fish in the River Delta deemed endangered)

Collectivism: Political philosophy where a small group determines the “greater good” for the masses. While it could take the form of communism, fascism, socialism, etc, the common denominator is control over the population.  Note:  The UN and Bilderberg work in concert to achieve ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT – a goal long sought since early on in the 20th century.

Commerce Clause: The Constitution provides that the federal government has power over commerce between states, but this power has been distorted and expanded beyond its original intention. The federal government uses this as an excuse to regulate resources, businesses and everything else.

Consensus: Facilitators will use the consensus process to reach a predetermined outcome. Minority positions are ignored in consensus. This is also used in education as more value is placed on reaching consensus than objective data.  Investigation of current text books and teaching plans will show a massive change in the content of books and teaching methods – gearing today’s kids expect AND accept the new world order, and believing that America is evil.

Corridors: Areas targeted for control. This word applies to strips of land that interconnect with Wildlands, where human presence and resource extraction are not allowed. This word is also used in relation to transportation routes and power grids as well.  (see NW examples below)

Councils: These organizations, comprised of insiders and stakeholders, are being used to usurp the power of local governments.

democracy_01

Democracy: Mob rule, or majority rule. We live in a Republic that is based in protecting individuals’ rights. Imagine if a lynch mob (the majority) wanted to hang you (the individual). Democracy contrasts with the American system, intended to operate as a Republic, with limited government powers and with the protection of individuals’ Unalienable Rights through a system of due process.

Endangered Species Act: This Act was based on a United Nations model and implemented through international treaties. It is a tool collectivists use to take over land and resources in pursuit of the abolition of private property.  Note:  NUMEROUS cases exist in the US where land has been declared off limits for human use and enjoyment – often from expanding the boundaries around national parks and forests, rivers and lakes etc.

Enumerated Powers: Power given to the congress in Article1, Section 8 of the Constitution, that are further limited by the Bill of Rights.

Equal Justice: Equal Justice is a respect for independence and unalienable rights of the individual and general tolerance for individuality. Equal justice puts a checkmate on mob rule.

Fabianism: Constant, slow change in government. i.e. Incrementalism.

Facilitators: Paid workers who use peer pressure and psychological manipulation to obtain consensus. (perfect example is a training manual produced by the APA *American Planning Assn)

Forfeiture: VIDEO (3 min) about how government can take your personal property.

Gaia: Pagan religion of nature worship honoring Mother Earth. Today, Gaia represents a philosophy that places nature above humans consistent with the Action Plan of Agenda 21. Agenda 21 is designed and used as a means to an end (depopulation and slavery). the Gaia philosophy is predicated on a “higher purpose” – to save nature at all costs.

Governance: To rule, control and manipulate America was based on the principals of a government of protection. G. Edward Griffin suggests we should not even use the word government, but a Protectorate instead.

Green: While we are all dependent upon and concerned about the environment, the environment has been elevated to a status above humans, under the banner of being “green”.

Gerrymander: Division of areas to give special advantages to certain groups; it is a mechanism to adjust Congressional boundaries to meet the ruling political parties’ objectives. Illegal immigration is a symptom of this type of social and political engineering occurring prior to every election season.

Human Rights: Those rights granted by men and capable of being withdrawn by men as outlined in the U.N.’s Universal Declaration of Human Rights. (Article 29 “These rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.” This means ‘Human Rights’ can be taken away).

ICLEI:The International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (also called Local Governments for Sustainability) is a U.N. accredited Non Governmental Organization (NGO). It implements the Action Plan of Agenda 21 Sustainable Development. Cities pay dues in order to obtain direction from ICLEI in establishing local policy and law. It is a violation of Article 1, Section 10 of the US Constitution which prohibits States and their subdivisions from entering alliances with foreign operatives.  ICLEI is also offering ‘grants’ to lure communities and states into implementing one of many of their ‘sustainable’ programs.

Insiders: A person in power who has access to confidential information and influences decisions, unbeknownst to the vast majority of citizens.

Individualism: The philosophy that the interests of the individual are, or ought to be, paramount. Collectivism is its opposite.

Inalienable Rights: Rights that are granted by the government. What is given can also be taken away. The U.N.’s Declaration of Human Rights is a system of of inalienable rights.

Unalienable Rights: Rights that we are born with. They may not be taken away by government. “That all men are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights.” This political recognition is why the Declaration of Independence is regarded as humanity’s greatest achievement.

NGOgroups

NGO’s: Non Governmental Organizations (NGOs) are accredited by the U.N. for purposes of implementing Agenda 21. They are well funded by governments. tax free foundations, corporations and individuals.

Outcome Based Education: Method of teaching wherein the student must be able to perform according to prescribed standards, and real knowledge and critical thinking are discounted if not all-together ignored.  Generally the standards are lowered to the lowest common denominator, hence more than 50% suffer from lack of adequate education.

Public- Private Partnerships (PPP): Corporations or other private entities like foundations, NGO’s, associations, etc that pair with government to enforce rules and policies that benefit the money partner (corporation) or government objectives. Public- Private Partnership is the re-invention of Mussolini’s system of economic fascism.

Private Property: Private property is the relationship between a person and something wherein the owner determines the use and enjoyment of the thing. Private property includes land, personal possessions and intellectual property. Private property also includes one’s own person, body and mind, which is why the protection of property rights are so important.   All such rights are actively threatened at the present.

Land ownership is the primary source of freedom and wealth!  And serves as the basis of the American Dream – growing ever more extinct!

Quality of Life: This phrase is frequently used in propaganda and official documents to sugar coat the underlying policies and intentions.  This is evident in most of the marketing materials supporting Agenda 21.

Regions: Political regions are established in order to replace existing political boundaries thus destroying the power of local governments. A water control agency would be an example of this. Regionalizing resources to remove power from local authorities is the way Russia was Sovietized.

Republic: A system of government that operates by rule of law and exists to protect individual rights. The Republic of the United States has a democratically elected representative government, but this does not make it a democracy.

Smart Growth: Herding people into cities and off rural land, for the purpose of controlling human action. Building up (high-rises), not out, and mixed-use buildings with stores on the ground floor with living spaces above exist within a walkable community. The objective is for people to stay within a small area in order to be easily controlled while the animals roam freely everywhere else.

Stakeholders: A person entrusted with the stakes of bettors. Stakeholders are shadowy entities that have influence and are referenced in many documents. Stakeholders in this new political context are those who combine efforts to drive a stake into the heart of private property.

Sustainable Development: The U.N. document called Agenda 21 lays the blueprint for advancing Sustainable Development. This is a euphemism for depopulation and control. The basis of the design is the “Three E’ program: “Equity”- using sociology and the law to create a global system of governance; “Economy”- meaning redistribution between nations and converting from free enterprise to Public- Private Partnership; and “Environment”- meaning nature above man.

Tenth Amendment: This is the key to the undoing of Agenda 21- the recognition of States’ rights and State sovereignty: “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, not prohibited to it by the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”

Wildlands: The counterpart to Smart Growth, it is designed to remove people from the land, using the excuse of “sustaining” wildlife; the plan is to remove people and eliminate resource extraction from over 50% of America’s landscape.

agenda21maplinks to UN plan/map:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b_q8bGPnL50

http://www.takingliberty.us/Narrations/usa/usa/player.html  (map and explanation)  MUST VIEW

AGENDA 21 – IT’S ALL ABOUT COMMUNITARIANISM AND BEST YOU BEWARE NOW

Posted by Karen S on September 2, 2011 at 7:49pm

I send this information which is valid all over the country and I urge, URGE each person reading this to go to their local City Government or Council and start asking questions. You will likely find that your community is heavily into Agenda 21 – and you need to know and understand just how you and your community are now at risk.

UN Local Agenda 21 – The Smoking Cannon

Many more “normal” people are talking and writing about the global government these days. So many more people are actually exposing the global government’s matrix that our ACL research has been elevated from “conspiracy theory” to necessary and vital information. The Big Plan for global Utopia is finally coming out into the open, because People are asking the right questions.

I’m not talking about the movie, “The Matrix,” although it was based in the Hegelian dialectic and matrix101 links directly to our antithesis. I’m not referring to a secret plan handed out at the Bilderberg or Club of Rome, although evidence shows elite groups participated in the creation of the NWO. I’m not talking about Bible prophecy, and I’m not talking about Luciferian Enlightenment or the secret British-Masonic-Zionist plan to make a better world either, although some communitarian teachers do admit they worship at the alter of Satan.

I am talking about the published plan to build a One World Bureaucracy. It’s the blueprint for Sustainable Development handed out at the Rio Earth Summit in 1992. It does exist and it’s completely verifiable, as more and more people will now admit. They have to.

United Nations Local Agenda 21 Programme for Sustainable Development is the “smoking gun” for the New World Order. Adopted by all member nations in 1992, this is the model for redesigning a communitarian world. If you’re like a lot of people who sense something is very wrong, if you’re looking for concrete, irrefutable evidence for the New World Order in your neighborhood, nothing comes close to asking your local officials about Local Agenda 21 (LA21).

Don’t just use the Internet to find your plan, although many of our LA21 plans and their affiliate agencies are available online. Exercise your authentic power. Call or stop by your local City Hall. Meet face-to-face with your elected public officials. Ask to review all local planning actions that come under UN guidelines for Sustainable Development (SD). Ask to review any local agreements with ICCLEI.

The existence of a master plan for global government can almost be verified in one call to our City or County Clerk. Asking whether there has been anything locally adopted or resolved that promotes Sustainable Development is not a hard question anymore. Even people outside government groups have heard this new term by now. Most people think it’s a good thing because they believe it arose naturally. It has a huge following. Hell, everything is going “sustainable” now. >From agriculture to industry to lifestyles to education, the whole world is promoting sustainability.

So, if every body’s doing it, it must be a good thing, right? What’s the big deal?

Well, first of all, if sustainability really just meant a benign way of healing the planet from corporate poisoning, it would not include so many laws that govern common people’s lives. There is nothing benign about Sustainable Development to the common man. SD is a set of global community laws that supplant individual liberty, formally maintained within national, state and local property and privacy laws.

Second of all, communitarian laws always “balance” the rights of the individual against the community; therefore SD only protects the global community government from the common man. Every nation in the world is experiencing a “wrenching transformation” of national laws into compliance with international SD law. LA21 could also be called “No Nation Left Behind.”

American homeowners are almost totally clueless as to why so much of the Stimulus Package is directed into upgrades that allow the government to monitor and control them inside their homes. What kind of system puts monitors on garbage trucks so that the trucks can scan our garbage cans in order to spot the cans that have recyclable items in the wrong cans? What kind of a system establishes neighborhood groups who monitor their neighbors for SD compliance and report infractions of new community biased regulations? What kind of a system puts RFID trackers in garments and Retinal Scans in Driver’s Licenses? What kind of a system builds a huge database of every one’s most private and personal information?

Think you know what your nation stands for? Still believe that SD is a local solution written by locals for a local purpose? Prove it. Go ahead. Stop reading this. Pick up a phone right now and call your City Clerk. Ask to review and copy anything having to do with U.N. Local Agenda 21 or Sustainable Development.

Because there are so many local programs implementing global SD, you will probably be told your request is “too broad.” So, okay, narrow your focus. This means get specific.

Ask your public servant (who works for you) which city and county agencies have already adopted Sustainable Development. After the usual “Why do you need this information?” which you do not have to answer with anything but a smile, the honest answer will likely be, “all of them.” If there’s any lingering doubt about how prevalent SD is in your home town, read and copy every local agency’s Mission Statement.

How do you tie Sustainable Development to the United Nations if your local government claims their Sustainable Development has no connection to U.N. Local Agenda 21? Ask them to give you a clear and legal definition for Sustainable Development. They have no choice but to waffle or cite the 1987 United Nations Bruntland Commission’s “official” definition for Sustainable Development http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2009/envdev1026.doc.htm.

You’ll see the terms for engagement very quickly. Once you’ve started, be prepared for the worst a TV trained government agent can throw at you. If you have property or own a local business, you are definitely taking risks. The risk is worth it though, since the ultimate price we’ll all pay is what happens to private property and privacy under the plan; it’s completely abolished.

And, since all U.S. constitutional law is based in private property rights, any plan to abolish private property is treason, pure and simple. They know this too.

How much can you find out about how far down the LA21 road your neighborhood has gone? This could be a real adventure if you took it on. Nothing incites the senses like following the path of your enemies into your own home. This is a global war. The real fight is over our land, our people and all our resources. It’s being fought every day on all our home fronts, from London to Kenny Lake, Alaska.

There are several other key terms to look for: livability, quality of life, common good, vision for the future, community values, to name just a few. When Americans find unfamiliar (new) terms used in any U.S. government document, because of our Federal (F.O.I.A.) and State Public Disclosure laws, we can request a clear, legal definition of the word or phrase. We can read and copy every government agent’s documents related to the use of the term too, from hand scribbled notes to polished propaganda. This is what real transparency in government means. Many other Western nations have similar laws.

If the idea of a war is too hard to accept, think of it as a fishing expedition. Stay quiet and calm so you don’t scare the fish away. Gently remove the hook and throw back all the small fish you catch, or use them as bait. Bide your time, wait for the granddaddy of all fish to smell the blood. This breed of fish devours its own, like a shark, so when you have the Big One on the hook, you’ve hooked them all on one line.

Who wants to show Americans and the rest of the world the extent of our new global laws, global-to-local development plans, and all our local partnerships with global associations (and funding). They may be openly revising their national constitutions in South America and the EU under supremacy of communitarian law, but in most Western free and open “democracies,” LA21 plans are anything but open.

For those who need to know more, Sustainable Development is based in communitarianism (see above and below definition). This philosophy drives every aspect of the emerging supra-national system. If you understand the theory, you’ll understand the new tactics. Once you’ve verified for yourself that LA21 plans exist for your area, do a little Internet search for the term “communitarianism.” The results will amaze you.
communitarianism

Political and social philosophy that emphasizes the importance of community in the functioning of political life, in the analysis and evaluation of political institutions, and in understanding human identity and well-being. It was developed in the 1980s and ’90s in explicit opposition to the theoretical liberalism of thinkers such as John Rawls. According to communitarians, liberalism relies on a conception of the individual that is unrealistically atomistic and abstract; it also places too much importance on individual values such as freedom and autonomy. Its chief representatives include Amitai Etzioni, Michael Sandel, and Charles Taylor. See also collectivism.

http://www.crossroad.to/Quotes/communitarian/niki.htm

http://www.scribd.com/doc/19167385/Communitarism-versus-Neoliberalism

This is truly sickening!

Further links of utmost importance:

http://www.un.org/esa/agenda21/natlinfo/countr/usa/natur.htm

http://americanpolicy.org/sustainable-development/agenda-21-in-one-…

http://www.iclei.org/index.php?id=iclei-home (the group in charge)

“Land…cannot be treated as an ordinary asset, controlled by individuals and subject to the pressures and inefficiencies of the market. Private land ownership is also a principal instrument of accumulation and concentration of wealth, therefore contributes to social injustice.” From the report from the 1976 UN’s Habitat I Conference.

What is not sustainable?

Ski runs, grazing of livestock, plowing of soil, building fences, industry, single family homes, paved and tarred roads, logging activities, dams and reservoirs, power line construction, and economic systems that fail to set proper value on the environment.” FROM:  UN’s Biodiversity Assessment Report.

Hide Agenda 21’s UN roots from the people

“Participating in a UN advocated planning process would very likely bring out many of the conspiracy- fixated groups and individuals in our society… This segment of our society who fear ‘one-world government’ and a UN invasion of the United States through which our individual freedom would be stripped away would actively work to defeat any elected official who joined ‘the conspiracy’ by undertaking LA21. So we call our process something else, such as comprehensive planning, growth management or smart growth.” J. Gary Lawrence, advisor to President Clinton’s Council on Sustainable Development.

Who is behind it?  (start with Bilderberg and George Soros, then add in the UN and all those listed below)

ICLEI – Local Governments for Sustainability (formally, International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives). Communities pay ICLEI dues to provide “local” community plans, software, training, etc. Additional groups include American Planning Council (the same group that is now instituting a national training program to overcome objections to A21 – a well funded, sophisticated manual to train people around the US to battle for and institute A21), The Renaissance Planning Group, International City/ County Management Group, aided by US Mayors Conference, National Governors Association, National League of Cities, National Association of County Administrators and many more private organizations and official government agencies. Foundation and government grants drive the process.

NOTE: Cities sign on to get grants – their greed and avarice overshadowing the massive strings attached, and the dire consequences to all communities. Money talks, BW walks and these people have plenty of money to throw at towns and cities across America and the world –

In my humble opinion, THIS is the greatest threat to this nation and it encroaches from within – at community levels – by pleasant sounding names that spell danger and destruction to the American way of life – and that means home ownership, business ownership, owning land and cattle, farming or personal gardens, living life as YOU choose – all GONE.

There can’t be enough written about AGenda 21 or Project 60, not nearly enough and EVERY CANDIDATE for state or national office should be trained in and propel this issue to the forefront of their campaign strategies.

Currently there is a big land grab in the works to supposedly expand the Olympic National park around the the Quinault area as well as several other spots on the Olympic Peninsula. In Oregon – Bandon Marsh Wildlife Refuge. This is a wholesale trampling of individual rights focused on the Coquille River near Bandon!
There are several websites with information concerning this crime against hard working Americans – a $900 Million Dollar Agenda 21-ICLEI land grab.

You won’t know it’s happening until many people have had their homes stolen right out from under them.

I figured I’d get the word out on this (Olympic National Park) attempt to buy up 210,000 acres . The website opposing all this is at http://www.workingwildolympics.com/ .

Also you can go to http://www.muddyexp.com/index2.html for more details.

We must help these people get the word out about this despicable abuse of power if Obama completes this theft of homes/land from hard working Americans, who among us will be next, and where?

This is Agenda 21 on the rise – now.

I urge you to check out the UN maps for Agenda 21(see above links) – in reference  to each state. You will notice that there is very little land designated for human use in most of the West.

.Vanderboegh warns of civil war if UN small arms treaty enforced

July 12, 2012 3 comments

The continually developing story of the two U.N. treaties that [obama and hitlery]  intends to sign continues to provoke controversy around the country today. The two treaties, the Law of the Sea Treaty (LOST) and the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) or “small arms treaty,” have created a firestorm of protest among citizens who see both as a threat to American freedom and U.S. sovereignty.

Today the controversy continues as one nationally known blogger and investigative reporter stated that if the small arms treaty is signed by Obama and approved by the Senate, the first time that the government attempts to enforce it will lead directly to civil war.

Among gun rights and liberty enthusiasts, Mike Vanderboegh of Sipsey Street Irregulars became a household name along with National Gun Rights Examiner David Codrea when the two broke the story of the gargantuan Fast and Furious scandal in December of 2010.

The scandal has so engulfed the Obama administration that Attorney General Eric Holder was found in to be in contempt of Congress for his refusal to turn over to Congress key documents that are needed to complete the ongoing investigation. Holder is the first attorney general in U.S. history to be held in contempt.

Vanderboegh commented today on the controversial U.N. small arms treaty, stating that he has concluded that he will not worry about the issue. However, he issued the following warning:

This is one of a hundred things I refuse to worry about. Let ’em pass it and sign the damn thing. The first time they use it for an excuse to further circumscribe our rights here, somebody will likely get shot, and so on, and so on, until the civil war they start is won by the Three Percent.

CONTINUE READING EXAMINER ANTHONY MARTIN’S ARTICLE HERE: http://www.examiner.com/article/vanderboegh-warns-of-civil-war-if-un-small-arms-treaty-enforced?CID=examiner_alerts_article

And before you say “That can’t happen here! Treaties must be ratified by the senate!”  You’re wrong.  Here’s how those beasts are going to accomplish their diabolical schemes:
https://twg2a.wordpress.com/2012/03/14/dont-count-on-the-constitution-of-the-united-states-of-america-to-stop-the-un-gun-grabbing-scheme/

THE THREE PERCENT (III%)

* During the Revolutionary War, only THREE percent of the people actually fought against Great Britain.

* Only TEN percent of the citizens actively supported that three percent.

* Approximately TWENTY percent considered themselves to be on the side of the Revolution, but they did not actively participate.

* Toward the climactic end of the war, approximately THIRTY percent actually fought on the side of the British.

* The rest of the citizens had no disposition either way. They didn’t care. They didn’t want anything to do with what they deemed to simply be a political issue.

The sanctity, liberty, and freedoms of this nation were brought about by the unselfish, honorable, patriotic, committed, and determined acts of a mere 3%.

This three percent didn’t let the comforts of life blind them to the eternal significance of freedom. They didn’t allow evil speaking to sway what their heart told them was true. They didn’t postpone their actions for a more convenient time. They didn’t value their own life over the life and liberty of their fellow citizens.

In many cases, they sealed their testimony of Freedom, Liberty, and Choice with their blood and the blood of their families. Although it was only three percent, it was still sufficient to create a nation which was to be an example to all the rest of the world of a truly free republic. This three percent laid the foundation of the most powerful and prosperous nation on the earth. This valiant three percent manifested to the entire nation, and surely even the world, the unalienable value of hope, faith, family, virtue and freedom.

Here’s some current figures, courtesy Dave Posh. Thank You, Dave.

Interesting information. Using these percentages, along with today’s USA population number from the 2010 census (308,745,538), we can calculate how many people would be needed today to defend Freedom, Liberty, and our Constitution from our oppressors.

We would need 9,262,366 (3%) people to fight for our Constitution.
We would need 30,874,554 (10%) people to actively support the Constitution.
We would need 61,749,108 (20%) people to be on the side of the Constitution.
There would be 92,623,661 (30%) people that would be on the side of our oppressors.
And, the 114,235,849 (37%) remaining would be apathetic.

DAMNED STRAIGHT.  Do the math.

I’m not the only American citizen who will fight this crap until there is no oxygen left in my lungs. 

 

NO JOKE: IRAN TO OVERSEE UN ARMS TRADE TREATY “NEGOTIATIONS”!!!


[TWG: With Iran on the so-called “Human Rights Council” at the UN, is it any surprise they will be calling shots on the Arms Trade “negotiations” at the UN?  The UN is a cauldron of evil that should be banned from the United States forever.  On the same issue, WATCH HITLERY. She’s using the syria conflict to relinquish our veto powers at the UN. Watch what that evil monster does. She’s selling us out.  I’m FED UP with so-called “gun rights advocates” saying this can’t happen here. IT IS HAPPENING. It’s happening RIGHT NOW. PAY ATTENTION.]

 

Iran Named to Group Overseeing U.N. Arms Treaty Conference; ‘Like Choosing Bernie Madoff to Police Fraud’

July 9, 2012
 
(CNSNews.com) – Iran has been chosen as a member of the “bureau” overseeing a month-long United Nations conference in New York aimed at finalizing a controversial global “arms trade treaty.” 

The move, which came as the conference got underway last week but received virtually no attention, is the latest example of Iran taking up leadership positions at the United Nations despite its defiance of Security Council resolutions relating to its nuclear program….(Con’t)

 

CONTINUE READING: http://cnsnews.com/news/article/iran-named-group-overseeing-un-arms-treaty-conference-choosing-bernie-madoff-police

FAST & FURIOUS Deja Vu? Report Points To Clinton-era Gunwalking

June 29, 2012 3 comments

[TWG Note: No surprises here. We know billary hates our Second Amendment because their future at the UN cauldron of evil depends on disarming Americans via the UN gun grabbing schemes or via their false flags leading to the imposition of martial law here in America.  Either way, those evil beasts know full well they’re in for one HELL of a fight.  If they wouldn’t have been busted for their gunrunning down to Mexico, they probably would have been much further along in their diabolical schemes.  I’m sure we’ll hear more about billary (aka hitlery) visit to the UN gun-grabbing-circlejerk session next month. Sure wish more people would PAY ATTENTION to this issue.  I see the NRA good-ole-boys finally stopped saying it wasn’t a concern.  “Bout time.]

 

David Codrea's photo

Gun Rights Examiner
 

The first official identified by name in the Fast and Furious gunwalking investigation has been tied to a similar Minnestoa operation in 1996 where “more than 150 guns flow[ed] into the Twin Cities underworld,” Kevin Diaz of the Star Tribune reported yesterday. Identifying supervisor George Gillette, Jr., who is now a cooperating witness in House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform investigations, Diaz reveals “Gillett was a street agent tracking gun store sales to ‘straw buyers’ working for suspected gang members. Some of those guns turned up in drug busts and crime scenes, including one that was found at the scene of a deadly shootout in north Minneapolis.”

Gillette was first identified as a central figure in the Fast and Furious investigation by a post on CleanUpATF, a whistleblower website aimed at exposing agency corruption, which was first reported by Mike Vanderboegh of Sipsey Street Irregulars in late December, 2010…. (Con’t)

CONTINUE READING: http://www.examiner.com/article/report-points-to-clinton-era-gunwalking?CID=examiner_alerts_article

 

At the UN HQ. Shouldn’t this say “Disarm AND Perish”, rather than “Disarm OR Perish”? Any questions as to billary and the UN’s goals for us?

 

LOST – Law Of The Sea Treaty MUST Be Stopped.

June 22, 2012 1 comment

“It is global socialism. It is world government… It is a trap!”  -Phyllis Schlafly

 

 

UN Flag     But at this very moment, a cabal of RINO’s and Democrats are scheming to sneak this measure through the United States Senate… a UN-style treaty that is actually designed to hand over US sovereignty to a Third World, United Nations front-organization on a silver platter.

      It sounds too strange to be true but they’re actually planning to voluntarily cede control of the oceans and seas to an international, America-hating, United Nations front-organization and force us to pay “GLOBAL TAXES” for the privilege of doing just about anything on the open seas… that is… IF and WHEN we’re ALLOWED by the America-haters of the world to do ANYTHING on the open seas.

      Of course, we’re talking about the insane Law of the Sea Treaty (LOST) and it must be stopped.

     In a nutshell, LOST is an “international agreement” that hands over control of the high seas and the ocean floor to an organization which calls itself the International Seabed Authority (ISA), a wholly owned subsidiary of the United Nations and the Third-World.

     Make no mistake, if this cabal of Democrats and globalist RINOs succeed and ratify LOST:
 

check  LOST would instantly become a permanent part of United States law and America would immediately surrender control of the free oceans and seas to the International Seabed Authority (ISA)… a United Nations front organization.

check  The ISA would have the sole power and authority to issue “permits” for fishing and drilling and mining operations at sea. In other words, if we wanted to drill for oil under the ocean, we’d have to crawl on our knees, tin cup in hand, and beg for permission from a gang of America-haters.

check  And even U.S. fishermen would have to come to ISA, hat in hand, and plead for the right to cast their nets into waters that have previously been open to all fishermen.

     The greatest threat to our sovereignty (LOST) is back. Globalist stooges in the United States Senate, on both sides of the aisle, tried to sneak it past us under the cover of darkness and ram it down our throats in 2004 and 2007.  Both times, patriotic Americans, like you, helped expose this plot, beat it back… and with your help we’re going to do it again.


 

Use the hyperlink below to send your urgent Blast Fax messages to EACH AND EVERY Republican Member of the United States Senate. While too many RINOs have swallowed the globalist Kool-Aid, we only need the support of 34 Senators to scuttle the so-called Law of the Sea Treaty and you can make that happen right here and right now.

If button above does not work, please use this hyperlink.


LOST Was Bad News Thirty Years Ago And It’s Still Bad News Today.

     The fight over LOST is nothing new. Globalists in the United States Senate first tried to push LOST down our throats over 30 years ago, but President Ronald Reagan drew a line in the sand back then and said that LOST would become United States law “over my dead body” … and it was no exaggeration… he meant it.

     As a matter of fact, Reagan was so passionate in his opposition to LOST that, when he took took office, he made it a point to FIRE the State Department personnel responsible for promoting this treasonous treaty during the Carter Administration.

     If you really want to know what is wrong with LOST, Reagan summed it up best some thirty years ago: “No national interest of the United States can justify handing sovereign control of two-thirds of the Earth’s surface over to the Third World.”

     According to Carrie E. Donovan of the Heritage Foundation, Reagan had three major objections to LOST.
 

check  First, he objected to the International Seabed Authority (ISA), an organization designed to “shake-down” United States mining and maritime companies by requiring an “application fee” of $500,000, an “annual fee” of $1 million, and a percentage of profits – up to 7 percent. Moreover, US companies would have been required to share sensitive and proprietary technology with unfriendly nations. And yes, as a direct result of these “fees,” the ISA would have had the effective power to tax American citizens.

check  Second, Reagan understood the true purpose of restricting the world’s supply of minerals by limiting access to the sea floor. It was to force nations (read that, us) to buy more from land-locked and often unfriendly third-world countries.

check  And third, he objected to the establishment of a United Nations-style court to rule the waves and rule against the USA.

 

     Unlike Barack Hussein Obama, Reagan regarded himself as President of the United States rather than Savior of the Third World. He wasn’t willing to surrender an inch of American sovereignty and would never condone forcing Americans to kneel and pay tribute to a bunch of third-world despots.

     And we know today what President Reagan knew then. If this treaty is approved by the Senate, Americans will surrender freedoms they can never regain and we must act now to preserve our freedom and our sovereignty.

 


 

Use the hyperlink below to send your urgent Blast Fax messages to EACH AND EVERY Republican Member of the United States Senate. While too many RINOs have swallowed the globalist Kool-Aid, we only need the support of 34 Senators to scuttle the so-called Law of the Sea Treaty and you can make that happen right here and right now.

If button above does not work, please use this hyperlink.


And Yes, There’s More.

     If LOST is ratified, the International Seabed Authority would have the power to impose taxes on the people of the United States. The ISA will call them “assessments,” “fees,” and “permits,” but they would be taxes that American businesses… and therefore consumers (that’s you) would be forced to pay to third-world despots.

     Oh yes, that cost of doing business will be passed along to you. How much do you pay in taxes now for such exploration? Not one penny.

     Can you see any reason why Americans should be forced to pay a United Nations style bureaucracy to do something we now do for free? Of course not.

     But that’s not all. This treaty from hell would not only tax Americans, it would also imperil our national security.
 

check  LOST would empower the International Seabed Authority to cripple the United States Navy – one of the most powerful forces for good in the world today – and leave us vulnerable to attack.

check  It would forbid our Navy from gathering intelligence in waters proximate to our nation’s enemies.

check  U.S. submarines would have to travel on the surface in those same waters.

check  And we would be obliged to share our intelligence with the International Seabed Authority, where it would be funneled to Iran’s Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and other tin-pot lunatics around the world – all of whom have vowed to destroy the Great Satan.

 

     Today the United States Navy can go anywhere in the world, not only because it is the most powerful force afloat, but because it enjoys the respect of virtually every nation. Why surrender this power and freedom to an inconsequential, international cabal of America-haters?

     We live in a dangerous world, where tiny nations like Iran and North Korea have nuclear weapons programs and would have no qualms about incinerating one of our cities to please whatever brutal gods they worship.

     If we approve this treaty, we might well be signing a suicide note.

 


 

Use the hyperlink below to send your urgent Blast Fax messages to EACH AND EVERY Republican Member of the United States Senate. While too many RINOs have swallowed the globalist Kool-Aid, we only need the support of 34 Senators to scuttle the so-called Law of the Sea Treaty and you can make that happen right here and right now.

If button above does not work, please use this hyperlink.


All Hail The New World Order. Lest You Think We Exaggerate, Or Have LOST Our Minds; Here’s What Other Respected Conservatives Say About LOST.

     Ed Meese, Reagan’s Attorney General, and William Clark, his National Security Adviser, once called LOST “a dramatic step toward world government” and warned us against “the increasingly brazen hostility of the United Nations and other multilateral institutions to the United States and its interests.”

     James Malone, President Reagan’s Special Representative for the Law of the Sea Conference and Chief of the Delegation, said about LOST: “The Treaty’s provisions were intentionally designed to promote a new world order – a form of global collectivism known as the New International Economic Order (NIEO) – that seeks ultimately the redistribution of the world’s wealth through a complex system of manipulative central economic planning and bureaucratic coercion.”

     Oliver North once said: “LOST also opens the door to a long-sought U.N. goal: the redistribution of wealth by taxing Americans. The International Seabed Authority (ISA), a bloated, multi-national bureaucracy headquartered in Jamaica, has the mandate to distribute revenues and ‘other economic benefits’ on the basis of ‘equitable sharing criteria,’ taking into account the interests and needs of developing States.”

     Steve Groves, of the Heritage Foundation, an expert on LOST, wrote: “In addition to needlessly exposing itself to baseless environmental lawsuits, the United States would be required to transfer billions of dollars in oil and gas royalties…to the International Seabed Authority for redistribution to the developing world.”

     Senator Jim DeMint said: “This treaty would subordinate American sovereignty to the United Nations, impose an international tax on U.S. energy production that would raise costs for American families, and act as a backdoor Kyoto Protocol that could allow foreign nations to regulate U.S. energy emissions.”

     Forbes columnist Larry Bell reported that “as much as 7 percent of U.S. government revenue that is collected from oil and gas companies operating off our coast would be meted out to poorer, landlocked countries.”

     Tad Cronn, the editor in chief of The Patriots Almanac, wrote: “The treaty, which was endorsed by the former Soviet Union, would reduce our military power, rob us of rights over our own coastal resources, subject U.S. actions in international waters to the authority of foreign countries and submit our country to an international taxing agency that would ‘redistribute’ our wealth to other nations, including some of our enemies. … As for increasing our national security, only a liberal could think that joining a treaty that requires us to give away secrets and our best technology to foreign nations that may use it against us is a way to secure the country.”

     But conservative icon, Phyllis Schlafly may have said it best: “It is global socialism. It is world government… It is a trap!”

     We could tell you that LOST is an Obama power-grab, but that would be a bold-faced lie. In actuality, it’s an Obama power-giveaway… a treasonous attempt to sublimate the United States to the global community.

     It should be obvious that this treaty was designed with one purpose is mind: to cripple and rob the United States of America and we’re not about to let that happen.


 

Use the hyperlink below to send your urgent Blast Fax messages to EACH AND EVERY Republican Member of the United States Senate. While too many RINOs have swallowed the globalist Kool-Aid, we only need the support of 34 Senators to scuttle the so-called Law of the Sea Treaty and you can make that happen right here and right now.

If button above does not work, please use this hyperlink.


We’ve Got Some Bad News And We’ve Got Some Good News.

     The bad news is that far too many of our so-called Republican Senators are swallowing the globalist Kool-Aid.

     The Senate Foreign Relations Committee WILL (repeat, WILL) send the Law of the Sea Treaty to the full Senate for ratification, possibly by the time you read this urgent appeal, and try to fast-track a vote on this treasonous treaty before the American people are any the wiser.

     Why do we say “WILL?” Three of the nine Republicans on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Richard Lugar (RINO-IN), Bob Corker (RINO-TN) and Lisa Murkowski (RINO-AK), were on the Committee back in 2007 and voted in favor of LOST… and they’ll do it again.

     And there’s no doubt, if this treasonous and unconstitutional treaty passes in the Senate, the Great Usurper and Apologist-in-Chief, Barack Hussein Obama, WILL sign it into law.

     But there’s also good news. Treaties can only pass the United States Senate with a two-thirds majority and that means we only need 34 United States Senators to stand in opposition to LOST.

     That’s extremely do-able. You can make a difference right now, but it won’t be easy. The globalists in the United States Senate wouldn’t be pushing LOST again unless they felt certain they could reach across the aisle and muster the votes to pass it.

     They’re desperate… they see the handwriting on the wall… they know that the American people will reject Obama-Socialism at the polls in November and they’re trying to ram through what they believe can be rammed through before the election.

     Make no mistake. A vote in the Senate on LOST could be close and that’s why each and every Republican in the United States Senate needs to hear from you right here and right now.

     Liberals are already putting on a full court press. Using the Alinsky tactic of ridicule, they’re trying to shame the Republicans who are against LOST into voting for it through a campaign of lies and propaganda.

     The radical website, Think Progress, admonishes us: “One hundred and sixty-two other countries have ratified it, and the United States remains the only industrialized nation that has not joined the international community. (Other nonsignatories include such heady company as North Korea, Iran, Syria, and Libya.)” Get it? Only barbaric totalitarian morons have any objections to LOST.

     According to Radio Boston: “Members of the U.S. Navy, the countries’ business community and most of the country’s former secretaries of state are in support of the U.S. signing onto the treaty.” Give us a break. Of course high-ranking elitists support LOST. That’s news?

     And speaking of elitists, Stewart M. Patrick, senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, says that those who oppose LOST are “still trotting out long-discredited talking points.” The fact that such a statement (it’s a crock, by the way) is coming from a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations just about says it all. We rest our case.

     But the latest scuttlebutt in Washington is that ratifying the Law of the Sea Treaty would “give the United States a seat at the table.” RINOs in Congress love that expression…. they used that same idiotic rationale a couple of years ago to justify their support of ObamaCare… BEFORE you successfully demanded that they fly right and oppose it.

     And it’s a rather ridiculous statement when you think it through. The United States doesn’t need anyone’s “permission” to “sit at the table.”  It’s tantamount to inviting your friends (and some of your enemies) over to your house for Thanksgiving dinner, cooking the meal, and then begging them for a “seat at the table” once you’ve served the meal.

     The United States doesn’t need anyone’s permission to conduct business in open waters and the United States doesn’t need the Law of the Sea Treaty.  We’re not going to let this treasonous treaty gain any traction. The time to stop it is now!


 

Use the hyperlink below to send your urgent Blast Fax messages to EACH AND EVERY Republican Member of the United States Senate. While too many RINOs have swallowed the globalist Kool-Aid, we only need the support of 34 Senators to scuttle the so-called Law of the Sea Treaty and you can make that happen right here and right now.

If button above does not work, please use this hyperlink.


 

Floyd Brown

 

 

 

Floyd Brown

 

 

P.S. Even if you can not join us in this effort right now, you can still help us expose Barack Hussein Obama by sending this e-mail to at least 10 of your friends.

 

The U.N. Speaks: The Arms Trade Treaty Will Affect “Legally Owned Weapons”


 

June 22, 2012

Yesterday, the U.N. released its press kit for the July conference that will finalize the U.N. Arms Trade Treaty (ATT). The most interesting item in the kit is a lengthy paper by the U.N.’s Coordinating Action on Small Arms (CASA) program titled “The Impact of Poorly Regulated Arms Transfers on the Work of the UN.”

This paper perpetuates the belief, on which much of the ATT is based, that the big problem the world faces is a lack of agreed standards on arms transfers. That’s wrong: The big problem the world faces in this regard is that many U.N. member states are dictatorships, supporters of terrorists, or simply incapable of controlling their own borders.

But the paper makes it clear that the job of the U.N.—as the U.N. itself sees it—is to make the case for a very broad treaty. As CASA puts it, “Advocacy efforts should be developed…through relevant reports and op-eds, messages, and statements at relevant meetings and to the press.” So watch out for U.S. taxpayer-funded funded U.N. propaganda in a newspaper near you.

But in spite of its desperate efforts to rebut Second Amendment concerns, the U.N. can’t stop stepping on its own shoelaces. After proclaiming that the ATT “does not aim to impede or interfere with the lawful ownership and use of weapons,” the CASA paper goes on to say that “United Nations agencies have come across many situations in which various types of conventional weapons have been…misused by lawful owners” and that the “arms trade must therefore be regulated in ways that would…minimize the risk of misuse of legally owned weapons.”

How, exactly, would the ATT do that if it doesn’t “impede” or “interfere” with lawful ownership? The U.N. would have a lot more credibility on the ATT if it didn’t imply so regularly that the problem is as much lawful ownership as it is the international arms trade.

Of course, CASA isn’t just concerned with lawful ownership; it’s also campaigning against “community attitudes” that “contribute to the powerful cultural conditioning that equates masculinity with owning and using a gun, and regards gun misuse by men as acceptable.”

All this just goes to show that the U.N. regards gun ownership—even under national constitutional protection and for lawful activities—as a cultural failure that it needs to redress and that it has no patience at all with the idea that self-defense is an inherent right.

And that is exactly why the concerns that Senator Jerry Moran (R–KS) expressed at Heritage on Tuesday are so important—and why his criteria to ensure that the ATT does not infringe on Second Amendment rights are so valuable.

 
 
Will our Constitution protect us from the UN infringements upon our Second Amendment?  Don’t count on it.  Here’s why: https://twg2a.wordpress.com/2012/03/14/dont-count-on-the-constitution-of-the-united-states-of-america-to-stop-the-un-gun-grabbing-scheme/
 
 
Check status, read bill text, S 2205 current information at opencongress.org: http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s2205/show
 
Consider these photos:
 
This is at UN headquarters.  Notice it says “Disarm OR Perish”, instead of  what it *should* say… “Disarm AND Perish”.  
 
 
This is located in front of UN headquarters in Geneva.  Any questions?
 
%d bloggers like this: