Archive

Archive for the ‘2012 Elections’ Category

How Does a Federal Government Agency Donate Money To Politicians?

September 23, 2013 2 comments

While researching money given to certain anti-American terrorist politicians and groups, I see an interesting list that begs the question…….

Just HOW does a Federal Government agency and it’s employees, paid by the American Taxpayers, donate money to these politicians?  Here’s a list of some of obama’s major donors in the 2012 “election”.   I would very much like to know how some of these federal agencies and their taxpayer-funded grunts are getting away with this.  Or, rather, I’d very much like to know why the American Taxpayers are ALLOWING them to get away with it.

There is something very wrong with a system that allows this.

University of California $1,212,245
Microsoft Corp. $814,645
Google Inc $801,770
US Government $728,647
Harvard University $668,368
Kaiser Permanente $588,386
Stanford University $512,356
Deloitte Inc $456,975
Columbia University $455,309
Time Warner $442,271
US Dept of State $417,629
DLA Piper $401,890
Sidley Austin LLP $400,883
Walt Disney Corp $369,598
IBM Corp $369,491
University of Chicago $357,185
University of Michigan $339,806
Comcast Corp $337,628
US Dept of Justice $334,659
US Dept of Health & Human Services $309,956

obama’s Relentless Attacks On Our Military – Let’s Review Military Voting Rights

March 7, 2013 2 comments

TWG: Let’s just set aside for now the relentless attacks on Military pay, healthcare, benefits, deployments by this horrid regime, not to mention obama-napolitano designating our returning Veterans as DOMESTIC TERRORISTS  Take a look at how the obama regime has attacked voting rights for our Military troops.  It makes me physically ill whenever I see Veterans supporting this regime.  They are TRAITORS, spitting on the face of each and every Veteran who has ever served this once great Nation.  TRAITORS.  Not knowing what you’re supporting (IGNORANT APATHY) is no longer an acceptable excuse.

***********************************************************************

“Senate panel halts proposal for overseas military to vote electronically”

News from Kentucky.

“Military and Overseas Voters in 2012″

A Pew Data Dispatch. As I’ve argued in The Voting Wars, we have to do much more to enfranchise our overseas military personnel—especially with problems with voter registration (registration rates are very low).

“17 Computer Scientists: Invest More in Military Internet Voting; Letter: Internet voting only option for military “to achieve first class voter status””

The National Defense Committee has issued this press release. See also this statement.

“Pentagon unit pushed email voting for troops despite security concerns”

“Active-duty service members disenfranchised by Fla. voter purge”

CBS News: “Tampa-area resident and Navy captain Peter Kehring has spent more than 30 years in the U.S. military. But due to Florida GOP Gov. Rick Scott’s recent purge of voter rolls, Kehring will not be able to cast a vote on Election Day, reports Tampa CBS affiliate WTSP….And he’s not alone: Kehring is among 30 active and reserve service members in the Tampa area who have contacted the Hillsborough County Supervisor of Elections office, according to WTSP.”

This is the danger of voter purges just before the election—false positives which disenfranchise eligible voters.  Voter cleanup needs to happen in the off-season.   Better yet, we need to rationalize and nationalize registration for federal elections.

“Ohio Military and Overseas Voting”

“Senator: Defense Department Not Complying With Election Law”

This item appears at The Weekly Standard.

“Panetta wants proof voting offices are working”

“Romney campaign sues over absentee ballots in Wisconsin”

CS Monitor: “The Mitt Romney campaign has filed a federal lawsuit in Wisconsin seeking a five-day extension for absentee voters overseas and in the military.”

“Officials want late absentee ballots counted”

LANSING, Mich. (AP)Secretary of State Ruth Johnson and Attorney General Bill Schuette want clerks in two dozen Michigan communities to extend the counting deadline for absentee ballots sent to residents overseas and in the military.

Eric Eversole Respond to Bob Carey on Military Voting Issues

Following up on this post, Eric Eversole sends along these thoughts:

The point that must not be forgotten is that the Federal Voting Assistance Program (FVAP) failed to provide military voters the assistance required under federal law.  The most recent allegations are an attempt to deflect criticism from FVAP’s failures and cloud the real problem of low military voter participation rates.

Contrary to Mr. Carey’s claims, the Military Voter Protection Project (MVP Project) considered whether to include “automatically” generated absentee ballot requests in our analysis of the 2008 election data.  Under federal law, as it stood in 2008, states were required to send out absentee ballots to military and overseas voters for two federal election cycles.  In other words, if a military voter requested an absentee ballot for the 2006 federal election, the state not only had to send absentee ballots for the 2006 election cycle, it also automatically send absentee ballots for the 2008 federal elections as well.

Federal law subsequently changed in 2009, but we decided to include automatic absentee ballots in our analysis for two reasons.  First, they were still valid absentee ballot requests for the 2008 election.  Second, a vast majority of these ballots were cast and counted.  This latter fact is evidenced by the 2008 post-election report by the Election Assistance Commission (EAC), where nearly two-thirds of these ballots were received by the voter and were returned to the local election official to be counted.

For us, it came down to this:  if you are trying to gauge the number of potential participants in an election, why would you exclude valid absentee ballot requests, especially when a vast majority of those ballots were returned and counted?  Regardless of the source, they represent thousands of real military and overseas voters that participated in the 2008 election.  Now, they represent thousands of military and overseas voters that may not be able to participate in the upcoming election.

Nor should anyone buy the false claim that military and overseas voting is actually up in 2012.  That claim can only be made by ignoring the 231,000 automatic absentee ballots that were sent out and the 150,000 that were returned to local election officials to be counted.  It makes no sense to exclude these ballots unless you were trying to understate actual participation rates in 2008.

If you look at the number of military and overseas ballots that were counted in 2008, it shows you how far we must go in the coming weeks to meet 2008 totals.  Take Florida, for example:  in 2008, the state counted 95,014 absentee ballots from military and overseas voters.  Yet, as of September 22nd, the state had sent only 65,173 absentee ballots to these voters.

The same holds true for Virginia.  In 2008, Virginia counted 28,816 military and overseas ballots in the presidential election, but has sent out only 12,292 for this year’s election as of September 22, 2012.  It doesn’t take much to figure out that it will be difficult to meet the 2008 participation levels, even if every single ballot is returned and counted.

The more interesting discussion is not whether the number of absentee ballots will be down this year, but how much of the decrease can be blamed on FVAP, and most importantly, how we ensure that our military voters are not disenfranchised in this election.  Some commentators have pointed to the reduction in overseas deployments and a reduction in activated National Guard members, as an excuse for reduced absentee ballot requests.  Others have pointed to the removal of the automatic absentee ballot requests from federal law and how that may have impacted participation.

These factors, however, do not overcome FVAP’s failure to implement a key provision of the MOVE Act—one that would have created a more systematic basis for allowing military voters to register and request an absentee ballot.  That process was supposed to be governed by the National Voter Registration Act or “Motor Voter.”

As many in the election community have long known, Motor Voter has played a critical role in helping all Americans, especially those in underrepresented communities, to participate in our elections.  When Congress passed the MOVE Act in 2009, it determined that military members should be entitled to the same benefits when the check into a new duty station.  Yet, that didn’t happen.

FVAP and the Pentagon’s failure to implement this requirement must be the central point in this discussion.  If we are going to improve the participation rates by military voters, they need a more systematic process to register and request an absentee ballot.  Until that occurs, our military members will continue to be one of the most disenfranchised groups in the United States.

“Ex-DoD Official Says Voter Group’s Numbers Wrong”

Important report from Military.com: “According to Carey, the problem is not the Pentagon and it’s not flagging voter interest, but MVPP’s analysis. MVPP either missed or ignored the fact that under the law in effect for 2008, election officials were required to send out thousands more ballots than were actually requested. At the time, the law mandated that absentee ballots be sent out to those who submitted a current ballot application and also to anyone who had applied for an absentee ballot in the prior election, 2006. That was bound to create a significant spike in the number of ballots mailed out, according to Carey. Trouble is, some of it was illusory.”

I suspect we will hear a response from Eric Eversole to this, although he did not respond to Military.com’s request for an interview.

Republicans Allege Obama Admin. Not Doing Enough to Help Military Voters

“Romney seeks extended deadline for overseas voters, including in Michigan”

AP: “Republican Mitt Romney’s campaign has sent letters to election officials in Wisconsin, Mississippi and Vermont demanding that the deadline for receiving ballots from military and overseas voters be extended.”

“Military ballot requests down in key battleground states”

“GOP-backed military coalition drops veil: Obama seeks to ‘undermine the rights of military voters’”

“Absentee Ballot Applications Down by Nearly Half in NC “

Michael McDonald: “The number of absentee ballot applications is down by nearly half from 2008. In 2008, election officials had received 37,539 applications compared to 20,695 in 2012, or 45 percent fewer applications. The number of applications from registered Republicans is down more than Democrats, which are also down. The percentage of registered Republicans declined by 55 percent while the percentage of registered Democrats declined 35 percent. Thus registered Republicans composed 51 percent of the earliest absentee ballot applications in 2008 and 42 percent in 2012. These numbers appear to confirm a report from Chapman University finding military absentee ballot applications are down from 2008.”

“Sen. Cornyn criticizes lack of voter assistance services to military overseas”

“New IG Report Sets Off Debate About MOVE Act Implementation”

“Report: Half of military bases lack voting facility”

The Washington Times reports.  My earlier coverage (including a link to the IG report) is here.

“Pentagon Report Finds Military Voting Efforts Underfunded, Ineffective”

TPM: “The Pentagon’s inspector general said in a report issued Tuesday that the federal government’s efforts to assist military voters under the Military and Overseas Voter Empowerment Act aren’t working thanks to underfunding and ineffective outreach to younger military personnel. Under the MOVE Act, every military installation that isn’t in a war zone is required to establish a voting assistance office. But the Department of Defense inspector general tried contacting every one of those offices and wasn’t able to contact half. The Air Force was the worst offender. The inspector was only able to contact 29 out of 74 offices.”

As I argue in The Voting Wars, the single biggest change we need to make for military voters is getting these voters registered.

“Ohio Ordered to Restore Weekend Early Voting in Judge’s Ruling”

“Why South Carolina Wants To Ban Student IDs At The Polls But Is Just Fine With Military IDs”

This is important.

“Evaluating the Expat Factor”

“Give Military Voters Extra Consideration”

This letter to the editor (responding to my recent oped) appears in the San Diego Union-Tribune.

“Report says fewer in military register to vote; Absentee ballot requests from military members and spouses are alarmingly low this election year, a voter advocacy group says.”

“Republicans Plot Assault On Iowa Caucuses On Military Voter Issue”

Fascinating BuzzFeed report. And I’ve long agreed that military disenfranchisement and other issues are a reason to kill the caucuses.

Retired Military ID OK in PA

In this earlier post, a reader suggested that a military ID for a retiree which says “indefinite” would not be usable to vote under PA’s voter id law.  I asked whether this was correct.

Thanks to a reader who points me to this PA website which says in listing acceptable documents: “An unexpired U.S. military ID – active duty and retired military (a military or veteran’s ID must designate an expiration date or designate that the expiration date is indefinite). Military dependents’ ID must contain an expiration date and must not be expired.”

Thanks for the information, and good news.

“Military voters as political pawns”

I have written this cover piece for the Sunday San Diego Union-Tribune opinion section. It begins:

It’s the election season, and the battle for the presidency and control of Congress is being fought not just through voter registration drives, endless campaign ads, and stadium rallies, but also in courts across America. Litigation over election rules has become increasingly commonplace since the disputed 2000 election in Florida, which led to the United States Supreme Court choosing George W. Bush over Al Gore. And as in 2000, the question of military voters and military ballots is back in the media and legal spotlight, with Republicans unfairly accusing Democrats of being anti-military.

A federal district court in Ohio will soon decide the Obama campaign’s challenge to an unusual Ohio law. The law allows military voters and overseas voters, but no other voters, the right to cast an in-person ballot in the three days before Election Day. Democrats argue that this law is unconstitutional because it “requires election officials to turn most Ohio voters, including veterans, firefighters, police officers, nurses, small business owners and countless other citizens, away from open voting locations, while admitting military and nonmilitary overseas voters and their families who are physically present in Ohio and able to vote in person.”

Another snippet:

The claim that Democrats were trying to undermine the military vote was especially ironic. The only significant federal election legislation to pass out of Congress since 2002 was the MOVE Act, a bill championed by Democrats to extend military voting rights. Overseas military voter turnout is abysmal, and the MOVE Act was a small step in the right direction by requiring states to get ballots to military voters on time. Still, Republicans have repeatedly criticized the Obama Administration’s Department of Justice for not implementing the MOVE Act aggressively enough against states which have sought waivers from its provisions.

Perhaps the Democrats are willing to fight about military ballots this time because of how they got burned in the Florida 2000 dispute. As I detail in my new book, “The Voting Wars,”; during the recounts of the ballots lawyers for Gore had been fighting against the counting of overseas ballots which did not have a postmark showing a foreign mailing before Election Day. When Republicans got wind of this, they accused Democrats of being anti-military. Democrats asked vice-presidential candidate Joe Lieberman to put the controversy to rest, but he said on the NBC news program “Meet the Press” that military ballots received by county canvassing boards should be given the benefit of the doubt.

Military Voters and Pa. Voter ID

A reader sends along the following thoughts:

While I firmly believe the Voter ID initiatives by several states are politically aimed at voter suppression among blacks and other minorities,I found myself being able to identify personally with the effects as explained by a Pennsylvania Congressman on the PBS News Hour the day the decision was handed down by the Commonwealth Judge. If the Congressman was correct in his explanation, one affected category of voter affected was military retirees. He explained that in Pa. all Picture IDs, Driver’s Licenses or Military IDs have to be current and reflect an expiration date. As military retiree, my military ID Card does not have an expiration date. It simply says Indefinite since I’m a retiree. It seems Pa. will not accept the Military ID Card of a retired serviceperson. My spouse’s military ID card does currently reflect an expiration date. Under current regulations however when she turns 75 she has to get a final ID Card that will reflect Indefinite just like mine. So if we were residents of Pa. and had become too old and infirm to drive, neither of us could use the military ID. True we would be able to get some sort of picture ID from the Motor Vehicle Registration offices but you get the gist. I’m sure the adverse impact of this law is worse for the minorities and I don’t know the total numbers of older military retirees that this affects but if it’s more than one it’s too damned many. I also wonder if other states have made similar decisions.

Is this correct under PA law?  Anyone too infirm to drive would likely be entitled to an absentee ballot, which is one way to deal with this problem.

Must-Read Ned Foley Post on Husted Early Voting Decision, Military Voting Case, and Pa Voter ID Case

Ned Foley has a must-read post, Analyzing a “Voting Wars” Trifecta.

Here’s a taste on each of the three areas Ned covers.

On Husted’s uniform voting requirement: “But one can reasonably question whether Husted’s new directive upholds the standard of fair-minded, nonpartisan election administration that Husted has repeatedly professed that he wishes to follow. The uniformity that Husted has now required precludes any in-person voting on Saturdays and Sunday during the five-week period that Ohio’s statutory law provides for early voting. Is that a position that a nonpartisan Director of Elections, who is neither Republican nor Democrat, would take?”

On Democrats’ suit involving early voting period and the military: “In my judgment, the better position is that even though the Anderson/Burdick/Crawford test is not the same as the “rational basis” test, the State ought to be credited with whatever policy justifications can be offered to justify a non-exclusionary regulation of the voting process. Perhaps it is the fact that I served as Ohio’s State Solicitor for two years (while on leave from Ohio State’s law school), but I don’t think federal constitutional law should trip up a State just because the State used an arguably faulty legislative process for adopting a substantive rule that would be undeniably valid using a different legislative process. Instead, except when strict scrutiny properly applies, the respect that States as sovereign governments in our federalist system deserve requires (in my view) that they should be given the benefit of the doubt, so that their legislation is sustained under federal constitutional law whenever there is a reasonable policy argument available to sustain it.”

On yesterday’s decision on Pa’s voter id. challenge: “I think the court there was justified in refusing to invalidate the law in its entirety, just as the U.S. Supreme Court was justified in Crawford in refusing to invalidate Indiana’s voter ID law in its entirety. The simple point is that the photo ID requirement in both cases is not a burden for the many voters who already possess the required photo ID, and as to these voters there is no reason to prohibit election officials from applying the requirement to present that form of ID when they vote. To be sure, there may be no great necessity in the State’s insistence that these voters show a photo ID, rather than some other form (like a bank statement or utility bill), but given the absence of a burden as to these voters, the State should be permitted to have its way. After all, the obligation to show a photo ID might have some minimally deterrent effect against ineligible voting, and given no harm to voters who already have this form of ID, the balance tips in the State’s favor. (As a policy matter, I would prefer an alternative voter ID requirement, but suboptimal policy does not render a law unconstitutional.)”

Read Ned!

“Campaigns spar over Ohio election law”

AP: “It doesn’t take much to start a political spat in Ohio, where jockeying for every presidential vote is practically blood sport. The latest pits President Barack Obama’s campaign against groups representing military voters, an uncomfortable place for the commander in chief.”

The hearing on the preliminary injunction was today, and the judge said he would take some time before ruling.

I will have more to say on this dispute in a piece to appear soon.

“Commentary: Protect votes of servicemen”

Jocelyn Benson in the Detroit News: “When Michigan’s sons and daughters, husbands and wives put aside their safety to protect ours and serve in the military, it’s our responsibility to ensure that they can exercise their right to vote. Dealing with a deployment is stressful and nerve-wracking for any military family. I know — I am an army wife, and my husband is currently serving in Afghanistan. As we juggle all of the responsibilities of military life, the last thing our service members and their families need is an added struggle of trying to get their ballots in time to vote.”

“Fact check: Obama not trying to curb military early voting”

Factcheck.org reports.

A Walk-Back on Walk-Back on Military Voting?

Following up on this post, see the Obama campaign statement appended as an update to this BuzzFeed story:

UPDATE: Adam Fetcher, a spokesman for the Obama campaign, sent BuzzFeed the following statement:

“It is not correct that the Obama campaign and the Democratic Party have shifted the position taken in the case brought in Ohio to protect early voting for the vast majority of the state’s voters over the last three days before the general election.

We fully support accommodations for the military, such as the Uniformed Overseas and Citizens Absentee Voting Act (UOCAVA) and the Military and Overseas Voter Empowerment Act that President Obama signed into law. We also believe it is arbitrary for the state to open the polls for the weekend and Monday before the general election but to turn away most Ohio citizens who seek to cast their vote during this period. We support the right of the military and overseas voters to vote then, and we support the right of all other Ohio voters to take advantage of this same opportunity. In short, everyone should have equal opportunity to come in on election day – or during the days leading up to it at open polling locations – and cast a vote.

It is important to note that Ohio voters have successfully qualified a referendum on the ballot to stop the legislature from enacting a series of limitations on voting, including early voting for all citizens during the last three days before the general election. After the referendum was approved for the November ballot, the state’s legislative leadership claimed it would repeal this early voting restriction. But the General Assembly then proceeded to re-enact it – in direct disregard of the will of the voters.

As the case before the court makes entirely clear, this case is aimed at arbitrary exclusion. It is about restoring rights, not taking them away.”

“Commission: Only Ohio Distinguishes Military, Civilian Early Voters”

BuzzFeed: “Ohio’s nonpartisan Legislative Service Commission finds that no states set the broad distinction that Ohio law does for early in-person voting — and only two states draw any legal distinction. Husted had it wrong.”

Mazur: Should We Have VIP Lanes for Military Voters?

Here is a guest post from Prof. Diane Mazur:

Should We Have VIP Lanes for Military Voters?

The Obama campaign has challenged an Ohio law that extends the early voting period for members of the military, but not for civilians.  The focus is on the three days right before Election Day.  Under the new law, service members stationed in Ohio can continue to vote in person on Saturday, Sunday, and Monday before the election, but civilians can cast early votes only through Friday.  When the Obama campaign asked a federal court to open the full early voting period to all voters, Mitt Romney accused the President of trying to undermine military voting rights.

Republicans said the lawsuit questioned whether it was constitutional to ever make accommodations for military voters.  This characterization is inaccurate, and silly.  There is a long history of accommodation for military and overseas citizens to vote by absentee ballot (for example, the federal Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act), and this is a settled understanding.

The Ohio law is the first, as far as I know, to grant extra voting privileges to service members voting in person, not by absentee ballot.  The Obama campaign is not arguing that service members are never entitled to accommodation based on the unpredictable circumstances of their assignments, but only that it is arbitrary to hold “military-only” voting days when all voters are physically present and able to vote in person.  If the election offices are going to be open, we should let everyone in the door.  The Republican Party has offered no reason why Ohio needs “military-only” voting booths for in-person voting.  The law does not address any specific burden or difficulty in voting, such as the rare service member who might be deployed without notice away from Ohio at the last minute, too late to register to vote by absentee.  The law privileges all Ohio service members for no reason other than being in uniform.

If you follow the statements of the military groups and Republican representatives closely, you’ll see that they glide back and forth between references to absentee and in-person voting, realizing that their in-person arguments are without precedent and without justification.  News reports ought to make clear that this is a giant leap beyond any other kind of military voting accommodation, and one that has nothing to do with the needs of the military.

It is all too easy to win arguments by accusing others of disrespecting the military.  What really disrespects the military, however, is using service members as a wedge for political advantage and setting military and civilian communities against one another.  This is, unfortunately, the sorry legacy of the 2000 presidential election.  We have created a generation of service members who firmly believe the false myth that military people were disenfranchised in 2000 when they attempted to vote from overseas, and they remain suspicious today.  The opposite was in fact true, that Florida elections officials were bullied into accepting ballots that were voted after the election, lest they be accused of being anti-military.  We’re still paying for those reckless arguments today in terms of poorer civil-military relations.  [For more, see A More Perfect Military: How the Constitution Can Make Our Military Stronger (Oxford University Press, 2010) (Chapter 11, “A Cautionary Tale About Military Voting”) and The Bullying of America (4 Election Law Journal 105 (2005)).]

The Ohio debate is more of the same all over again.  It reminds me of the classic science fiction novel Starship Troopers, a story about a future society in which residents could qualify to become citizens, and to vote, only by serving in the military.  The motivation behind the Ohio law granting “military only” voting days comes uncomfortably close to that vision.  The idea that we should afford greater accommodations of convenience to service members because they are somehow more deserving of the right to vote than the rest of America does great damage to military professionalism.  It’s important to protect the right to vote for all Americans, whether they serve in the military or not, and military professionals would agree.

Diane Mazur is a former Air Force officer and Professor of Law at the University of Florida

“Obama Campaign Opens Can of Worms with Ohio Early Voting Lawsuit”

National Journal reports.

“Romney Camp Still Won’t Say If Vets, Firefighters, Cops Deserve Early Voting Rights”

TPM reports.

“Early Voting Lawsuit In Ohio Draws Ire From Romney Campaign”

Must-listen Pam Fessler report for NPR.

“Early Voting in Ohio”

David Firestone: “If Mr. Romney truly cared about the ‘fundamental right to vote,’ he would support it for everyone, even those who might not support him.”

“Military Groups’ Argument About Obama Voting Lawsuit “Extremely Misleading,” Prof Says

Prof. Diane Mazur knows more about military voting rights than anyone else I know.  Read her interview with Buzzfeed.

Mazur’s ELJ piece on military voting in Florida 2000 was essential to my retelling of the Florida story in chapter 1 of The Voting Wars.

“Axelrod: Military Voters Should Get Special Consideration In Voting”

BuzzFeed: “Obama campaign senior adviser David Axelrod gave voice to a careful walk-back by the Obama campaign over its challenge to an Ohio early voting law….In their initial filing, the Obama campaign argued that it was arbitrary for military voters to be able to submit ballots during the three-day period but not non-military voters. But now they appear to be shifting their defense of the lawsuit, telling BuzzFeed that what is arbitrary is not the difference between military voters and ordinary civilians, but that the Ohio voters could vote in the three-day period before the election in 2008 but cannot in 2012.”

If that’s the argument, what’s the relevance of the military voter period?

“Romney: Obama lawsuit seeks to ‘undermine’ military voters”

The LA Times reports.

“Axelrod: Team Romney launching ‘shameful’ attack on voting rights lawsuit”

CNN reports.

“Obama, Democrats suing to block military voting in Ohio? Update: No”

This item appears at Hot Air.

Obama Campaign Responds to Romney on Military Voters in Ohio

See this statement (via TPM).

“Mitt Romney: We Must Defend The Rights Of Military Voters”

Press release:

Mitt Romney Press | August 4, 2012
Boston, MA

United States

Mitt Romney today made the following statement on early voting privileges for military servicemen and women in Ohio:

“President Obama’s lawsuit claiming it is unconstitutional for Ohio to allow servicemen and women early voting privileges during the state’s early voting period is an outrage. The brave men and women of our military make tremendous sacrifices to protect and defend our freedoms, and we should do everything we can to protect their fundamental right to vote. I stand with the fifteen military groups that are defending the rights of military voters, and if I’m entrusted to be the commander-in-chief, I’ll work to protect the voting rights of our military, not undermine them.”

My earlier coverage is here and here.  Note the relief sought in the Obama campaign complaint is all about getting early voting extended for all Ohio voters, and nothing about taking away early voting rights of military voters:

“The Right’s New Lie: Obama Suing to Keep Soldiers from Voting”

This diary entry by JR appears on Daily Kos.  My earlier coverage of this controversy is here.

“Obama campaign Ohio suit irks military groups”

AP: “Fifteen military groups are opposing a federal lawsuit in Ohio brought by President Barack Obama’s campaign because they say it could threaten voter protections afforded to service members, such as the extended time they have to cast a ballot.”

I expect Republicans to use this suit to paint Obama as anti-military.  In fact, I think the purpose of the suit is to extend the benefits in voting given to military voters in Ohio to all Ohio voters.

UPDATE: That didn’t take long.

SEE my more recent post on this issue, with a link to the complaint, here.

America’s Demise: Signed, Sealed and Delivered.

February 28, 2013 Leave a comment

TWG: The article below is an interesting read.  It confirms what those of us who are paying attention have been saying for some time now.  Everything is falling into place and the tracks have been laid for us all.  Between the 1968 Gun Control Act and the “Operatinal Guide to the IDDRS”,  we are headed along the path to our demise.  We’re witnessing our own suicide today. Thank a “educator” and the politicians and bureaucrats who’ve worked so diligently to destroy us.  Everything in this report is exactly what we’ve suspected.  I sure am relieved I have no children to worry about.   We’re in for a living HELL, and our descendents will never know Freedom, Liberty and Civil rights.  GOD help them.

.

Goodbye America.  I miss you, and I’m sorry we didn’t save you in time. We were too busy trying to maintain our jobs, pay our taxes and provide for our Families.  We trusted this Government had your, and our, best interests at heart when nothing could be further from the truth. Little did we know we were feeding the very beasts that destroyed you and us.  We didn’t know the UN was working behind the scenes to destroy us and we didn’t know that our public “educators” were destroying the minds of our children to erase any Patriotism, Integrity, Morals, Values and Honesty.  They replaced those traits with laziness, greediness, dishonesty and to be the fascist-loving obedient little slaves  that every dictatorial regime requires.  We trusted them with our most Beloved children, only to find out too late that they’ve been brainwashed by those government “educators” to become mindless followers of the enemy that will soon enslave them.  We had no idea our own children would be taught to defend and advocate for the very evil that destroyed us all.  

.

History proves all of these things are a repeat of the actions of some of the world’s most diabolical tyrants, Hitler, Mussolini et al.  The government “educators” have lied to our children in the classrooms and today we see the results of their diabolical efforts.   Entire generations of our youth have no idea what they’re doing to themselves, their families, their descendents and to this Nation.   THEIR future is quite bleak. 

.

Thanks, “educators”.  I hate you for what you’ve done to our children, our society and this once great Nation.  I hate you so deeply I can taste it, and when all is said and done, I pray you are shoved straight back to the Hell from which you slithered.  

.

“… when the struggle seems to be drifting definitely towards a world social democracy, there may still be very great delays and disappointments before it becomes an efficient and beneficent world system. Countless people … will hate the new world order … and will die protesting against it. When we attempt to evaluate its promise, we have to bear in mind the distress of a generation or so of malcontents, many of them quite gallant and graceful-looking people.” ~H. G. Wells

 

 

(Hat tip Bill W for the forward. Thank You, Bill)

The latest from “DHS Insider”

Author
- Doug Hagmann (Bio and Archives)  Thursday, December 27, 2012

Introduction: After a lengthy, self-imposed informational black-out, my high-level DHS contact known as “Rosebud” emerged with new, non-public information about plans being discussed and prepared for implementation by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in the near future. It is important to note that this black-out was directly related to the aggressive federal initiative of identifying and prosecuting “leakers,” at least those leaks and leakers not sanctioned by the executive office—the latter of which there are many.

Due to those circumstances, my source exercised an abundance of caution to avoid compromising a valuable line of communication until he had information he felt wassignificant enough to risk external contact. The following information is the result of an in-person contact between this author and “Rosebud” within the last 48 hours. With his permission, the interview was digitally recorded and the relevant portions of the contact are provided in a conversational format for easier reading. The original recording was copied onto multiple discs and are maintained in secure locations for historical and insurance purposes.

Meeting: The following began after an exchange of pleasantries and other unrelated discussion:

DH: Do I have your permission to record this conversation?

RB: You do.

DH: I’ve received a lot of e-mail from people wondering where you went and why you’ve been so quiet.

RB: As I told you earlier, things are very dicey. Weird things began to happen before the election and have continued since. Odd things, a clampdown of sorts. I started looking and I found [REDACTED AT THE REQUEST OF THIS SOURCE], and that shook me up. I’m not the only one, though, that found a [REDACTED], so this means there’s surveillance of people within DHS by DHS. So, that explains this cloak and dagger stuff for this meeting.

DH: I understand. What about the others?

RB: They are handling it the same way.

DH: I’ve received many e-mails asking if you are the same person giving information to Ulsterman. Are you?

RB: No, but I think I know at least one of his insiders.

DH: Care to elaborate?

RB: Sorry, no.

DH: Do you trust him or her. I mean, the Ulsterman source?

RB: Yes.

DH: Okay, so last August, you said things were “going hot.” I printed what you said, and things did not seem to happen as you said.

RB: You’d better recheck your notes and compare [them] with some of the events leading up to the election. I think you’ll find that a full blown campaign of deception took place to make certain Obama got back into office. The polls, the media, and a few incidents that happened in the two months before the election. I guess if people are looking for some big event they can point to and say “aha” for verification, well then I overestimated people’s ability to tell when they are being lied to.

DH: What specific incidents are you referring to?

RB: Look at the threats to Obama. Start there. The accusations of racism. Then look at the polls, and especially the judicial decisions about voter ID laws. Bought and paid for, or where there was any potential for problems, the judges got the message, loud and clear. Then look at the voter fraud. And not a peep from the Republicans. Nothing. His second term was a done deal in September. This was planned. Frankly, the Obama team knew they had it sewn up long before Election Day. Benghazi could have derailed them, but the fix was in there, so I never saw anything on my end to suggest a ready-made solution had to be implemented.

DH: What’s going on now?

RB: People better pay close attention over the next few months. First, there won’t be any meaningful deal about the fiscal crisis. This is planned, I mean, the lack of deal is planned. In fact, it’s necessary to pave the way for what is in the short term agenda.

DH: Wait, you’re DHS—not some Wall Street insider.

RB: So you think they are separate agendas? That’s funny. The coming collapse of the U.S. dollar is a done deal. It’s been in the works for years—decades, and this is one of the most important cataclysmic events that DHS is preparing for. I almost think that DHS was created for that purpose alone, to fight Americans, not protect them, right here in America. But that’s not the only reason. There’s the gun issue too.

DH: So, what are you seeing at DHS?

RB: We don’t have a lot of time, tonight—our meeting—as well as a country. I mean I have heard—with my own ears—plans being made that originate from the White House that involve the hierarchy of DHS. You gotta know how DHS works at the highest of levels. It’s Jarrett and Napolitano, with Jarrett organizing all of the plans and approaches. She’s the one in charge, at least from my point of view, from what I am seeing. Obama knows that’s going on and has say, but it seems that Jarrett has the final say, not the other way around. It’s [screwed] up. This really went into high gear since the election.

But it’s a train wreck at mid management, but is more effective at the lower levels. A lot of police departments are being gifted with federal funds with strings attached. That money is flowing out to municipal police departments faster than it can be counted. They are using his money to buy tanks, well, not real tanks, but you know what I mean. DHS is turning the police into soldiers.

By the way, there has been a lot of communication recently between Napolitano and Pistole [TSA head]. They are planning to use TSA agents in tandem with local police for certain operations that are being planned right now. This is so [deleted] important that you cannot even begin to imagine. If you get nothing else out of this, please, please make sure you tell people to watch the TSA and their increasing involvement against the American public. They are the stooges who will be the ones to carry out certain plans when the dollar collapses and the gun confiscation begins.

DH: Whoa, wait a minute. You just said a mouthful. What’s the agenda here?

RB: Your intelligence insider—he knows that we are facing a planned economic collapse. You wrote about this in your articles about Benghazi, or at least that’s what I got out of the later articles. So why the surprise?

DH: There’s a lot here. Let’s take it step by step if you don’t mind.

RB: Okay, but I’m not going to give it to you in baby steps. Big boy steps. This is what I am hearing. Life for the average American is going to change significantly, and not the change people expect. First, DHS is preparing to work with police departments and the TSA to respond to civil uprisings that will happen when there is a financial panic. And there will be one, maybe as early as this spring, when the dollar won’t get you a gumball. I’m not sure what the catalyst will be, but I’ve heard rumblings about a derivatives crisis as well as an oil embargo. I don’t know, that’s not my department. But something is going to happen to collapse the dollar, which has been in the works since the 1990s. Now if it does not happen as soon as this, it’s because there are people, real patriots, who are working to prevent this, so it’s a fluid dynamic. But that doesn’t change the preparations.

And the preparations are these: DHS is prepositioning assets in strategic areas near urban centers all across the country. Storage depots. Armories. And even detainment facilities, known as FEMA camps. FEMA does not even know that the facilities are earmarked for detainment by executive orders, at least not in the traditional sense they were intended. By the way, people drive by some of these armories every day without even giving them a second look. Commercial and business real estate across the country are being bought up or leased for storage purposes. Very low profile.

Anyway, I am hearing that the plan from on high is to let the chaos play out for a while, making ordinary citizens beg for troops to be deployed to restore order. but it’s all organized to make them appear as good guys. That’s when the real head knocking will take place. We’re talking travel restrictions, which should not be a problem because gas will be rationed or unavailable. The TSA will be in charge of travel, or at least be a big part of it. They will be commissioned, upgraded from their current status.

They, I mean Jarrett and Obama as well as a few others in government, are working to create a perfect storm too. This is being timed to coincide with new gun laws.

DH: New federal gun laws?

RB: Yes. Count on the criminalization to possess just about every gun you can think of. Not only restrictions, but actual criminalization of possessing a banned firearm. I heard this directly from the highest of my sources. Plans were made in the ‘90s but were withheld. Now, it’s a new day, a new time, and they are riding the wave of emotion from Sandy Hook, which, by the way as tragic as it was, well, it stinks to high heaven. I mean there are many things wrong there, and first reports are fast disappearing. The narrative is being changed. Look, there is something wrong with Sandy Hook, but if you write it, you’ll be called a kook or worse.

DH: Sure

RB: But Sandy Hook, there’s something very wrong there. But I am hearing that won’t be the final straw. There will be another if they think it’s necessary.

DH: Another shooting?

RB: Yes.

DH: That would mean they are at least complicit.

RB: Well, that’s one way of looking at it.

DH: Are they? Were they?

RB: Do your own research. Nothing I say, short of bringing you photographs and documents will convince anyone, and even then, it’s like [DELETED] in the wind.

DH: So…

RB: So what I’m telling you is that DHS, the TSA and certain, but not all, law enforcement agencies are going to be elbow deep in riot control in response to an economic incident. At the same time or close to it, gun confiscation will start. It will start on a voluntary basis using federal registration forms, then an amnesty, then the kicking-in of doors start.

Before or at the same time, you know all the talk of lists, you know, the red and blue lists that everyone made fun of? Well they exist, although I don’t know about their colors. But there are lists of political dissidents maintained by DHS. Names are coordinated with the executive branch, but you know what? They did not start with Obama. They’ve been around in one form or another for years. The difference though is that today, they are much more organized. And I’ll tell you that the vocal opponents of the politics of the global elite, the bankers, and the opponents of anything standing in their way, well, they are on the top of the list of people to be handled.

DH: Handled?

RB: As the situations worsen, some might be given a chance to stop their vocal opposition. Some will, others won’t. I suppose they are on different lists. Others won’t have that chance. By that time, though, it will be chaos and people will be in full defensive mode. They will be hungry, real hunger like we’ve never experienced before. They will use our hunger as leverage. They will use medical care as leverage.

DH: Will this happen all at once?

RB: They hope to make it happen at the same time. Big cities first, with sections being set apart from the rest of the country. Then the rural areas. There are two different plans for geographical considerations. But it will all come together.

DH: Wait, this sounds way, way over the top. Are you telling me… [Interrupts]

RB: [Over talk/Unintelligible] …know who was selected or elected twice now. You know who his associates are. And you are saying this is way over the top? Don’t forget what Ayers said – you talked to Larry Grathwohl. This guy is a revolutionary. He does not want to transform our country in the traditional sense. He will destroy it. And he’s not working alone. He’s not working for himself, either. He has his handlers. So don’t think this is going to be a walk in the park, with some type of attempt to rescue the country. Cloward-Piven. Alinsky. Marx. All rolled into one. And he won’t need the rest of his four years to do it.

DH: I need you to be clear. Let’s go back again, I mean, to those who speak out about what’s happening.

RB: [Edit note: Obviously irritated] How much clearer do you want it? The Second Amendment will be gone, along with the first, at least practically or operationally. The Constitution will be gone, suspended, at least in an operational sense. Maybe they won’t actually say that they are suspending it, but will do it. Like saying the sky is purple when it’s actually blue. How many people will look at the sky and say yeah, it’s purple? They see what they want to see.

So the DHS, working with other law enforcement organizations, especially the TSA as it stands right now, will oversee the confiscation of assault weapons, which includes all semi-automatic weapons following a period of so-called amnesty. It also includes shotguns that hold multiple rounds, or have pistol grips. They will go after the high capacity magazines, anything over, say 5 rounds.

They will also go after the ammunition, especially at the manufacturer’s level. They will require a special license for certain weapons, and make it impossible to own anything. More draconian than England. This is a global thing too. Want to hunt? What gives you the right to hunt their animals? Sound strange? I hope so, but they believe they own the animals. Do you understand now, how sick and twisted this is? Their mentality?

The obvious intent is to disarm American citizens. They will say that we’ll still be able to defend ourselves and go hunting, but even that will be severely regulated. This is the part that they are still working out, though. While the plans were made years ago, there is some argument over the exact details. I know that Napalitano, even with her support of the agenda, would like to see this take place outside of an E.O. [Executive Order] in favor of legislative action and even with UN involvement.

DH: But UN involvement would still require legislative approval.

RB: Yes, but you’re still thinking normal – in normal terms. Stop thinking about a normal situation. The country is divided, which is exactly where Obama wants us to be. We are as ideologically divided as we were during the Civil War and that rift is growing every day. Add in a crisis – and economic crisis – where ATM and EBT cards will stop working. Where bank accounts will contain nothing but air. They are anticipating a revolution and a civil war rolled into one (emphasis added by this author).

Imagine when talk show hosts or Bloggers or some other malcontent gets on the air or starts writing about the injustice of it all, and about how Obama is the anti-Christ or something. They will outlaw such talk or writing as inciting the situation – they will make it illegal by saying that it is causing people to die. The Republicans will go along with everything as it’s – we have – a one party system. Two parties is an illusion. It’s all so surreal to talk about but you see where this is headed, right?

DH: Well, what about the lists?

RB: Back to that again, okay. Why do you think the NSA has surveillance of all communications? To identify and stop terrorism? Okay, to be fair, that is part of it, but not the main reason. The federal agencies have identified people who present a danger to them and their agendas. I don’t know if they are color coded like you mentioned, red, blue, purple or peach mango or whatever, but they exist. In fact, each agency has their own. You know, why is it so [deleted] hard for people to get their heads around the existence of lists with names of people who pose a threat to their plans? The media made a big deal about Nixon’s enemies list and everyone nodded and said yeah, that [deleted], but today? They’ve been around for years and years.

DH: I think it’s because of the nature of the lists today. What do they plan to do with their enemies?

RB: Go back to what Ayers said when, in the late ‘60s? ‘70s? I forget. Anyway, he was serious. But to some extent, the same thing that happened before. They – the people on some of these lists – are under surveillance, or at least some, and when necessary, some are approached and made an offer. Others, well, they can be made to undergo certain training. Let’s call it sensitivity training, except on a much different level. Others, most that are the most visible and mainstream are safe for the most part. And do you want to know why? It’s because they are in the pockets of the very people we are talking about, but they might or might not know it. Corporate sponsorship – follow the money. You know the drill. You saw it happen before, with the birth certificate.

It’s people that are just under the national radar but are effective. They have to worry. Those who have been publicly marginalized already but continue to talk or write or post, they are in trouble. It’s people who won’t sell out, who think that they can make a difference. Those are the people who have to worry.

Think about recent deaths that everybody believes were natural or suicides. Were they? People are too busy working their [butts] off to put food on the table to give a damn about some guy somewhere who vapor locks because of too many doughnuts and coffee and late nights. And it seems plausible enough to happen. This time, when everything collapses, do you think they will care if it is a bullet or a heart attack that takes out the opposition? [Deleted] no.

DH: That’s disturbing. Do you… [interrupts]

RB: Think about the Oklahoma City bombing in ‘95. Remember how Clinton blamed that on talk radio, or at least in part. Take what happened then and put it in context of today. Then multiply the damnation by 100, and you will begin to understand where this is going. People like Rush and Hannity have a narrow focus of the political theater. They’ll still be up and running during all of this to allow for the appearance of normal. Stay within the script, comrade.

But as far as the others, they have certain plans. And these plans are becoming more transparent. They are getting bolder. They are pushing lies, and the bigger the lie, the easier it is to sell to the people. They will even try to sell a sense of normalcy as things go absolutely crazy and break down. It will be surreal. And some will believe it, think that it’s only happening in certain places, and we can draw everything back once the dust settles. But when it does, this place will not be the same.

DH: Will there be resistance within the ranks of law enforcement? You know, will some say they won’t go along with the plan, like the Oath Keepers?

RB: Absolutely. But they will not only be outnumbered, but outgunned – literally. The whole objective is to bring in outside forces to deal with the civil unrest that will happen in America. And where does their allegiance lie? Certainly not to Sheriff Bob. Or you or me.

During all of this, and you’ve got to remember that the dollar collapse is a big part of this, our country is going to have to be redone. I’ve seen – personally – a map of North America without borders. Done this year. The number 2015 was written across the top, and I believe that was meant as a year. Along with this map – in the same area where this was – was another map showing the United States cut up into sectors. I’m not talking about what people have seen on the internet, but something entirely different. Zones. And a big star on the city of Denver.

Sound like conspiracy stuff on the Internet? Yup. But maybe they were right. It sure looks that way. It will read that way if you decide to write about this. Good luck with that. Anyway, the country seemed to be split into sectors, but not the kind shown on the internet. Different.

DH: What is the context of that?

RB: Across the bottom of this was written economic sectors. It looked like a work in progress, so I can’t tell you any more than that. From the context I think it has to do with the collapse of the dollar.

DH: Why would DHS have this? I mean, it seems almost contrived, doesn’t it?

RB: Not really, when you consider the bigger picture. But wait before we go off into that part. I need to tell you about Obamacare, you know, the new health care coming up. It plays a big part – a huge [deleted] part in the immediate reshaping of things.

DH: How so?

RB: It creates a mechanism of centralized control over people. That’s the intent of this monster of a bill, not affordable health care. And it will be used to identify gun owners. Think your health records are private? Have you been to the doctor lately? Asked about owning a gun? Why do you think they ask, do you think they care about your safety? Say yes to owning a gun and your information is shared with another agency, and ultimately, you will be identified as a security risk. The records will be matched with other agencies.

You think that they are simply relying on gun registration forms? This is part of data collection that people don’t get. Oh, and don’t even think about getting a script for some mood enhancement drug and being able to own a gun.

Ayers and Dohrn are having the times of their lives seeing things they’ve worked for all of their adult lives actually coming to pass. Oh, before I forget, look at the recent White House visitor logs.

DH: Why? Where did that come from?

RB: Unless they are redacted, you will see the influence of Ayers. Right now. The Weather Underground has been reborn. So has their agenda.

DH: Eugenics? Population control?

RB: Yup. And re-education camps. But trust me, you write about this, you’ll be called a kook. It’s up to you, it’s your reputation, not mine. And speaking about that, you do know that this crew is using the internet to ruin people, right? They are paying people to infiltrate discussion sites and forums to call people like you idiots. Show me the proof, they say. Why doesn’t you source come forward? If he knows so much, why not go to Fox or the media? To them, if it’s not broadcast on CNN, it’s not real. Well, they’ve got it backwards. Very little on the news is real. The stock market, the economy, the last presidential polls, very little is real.

But this crew is really internet savvy. They’ve got a lot of people they pay to divert issues on forums, to mock people, to marginalize them. They know what they’re doing. People think they’ll take sites down – hack them. Why do that when they are more effective to infiltrate the discussion? Think about the birth certificate, I mean the eligibility problem of Obama. Perfect example.

DH: How soon do you see things taking place?

RB: They already are in motion. If you’re looking for a date I can’t tell you. Remember, the objectives are the same, but plans, well, they adapt. They exploit. Watch how this fiscal cliff thing plays out. This is the run-up to the next big economic event.

I can’t give you a date. I can tell you to watch things this spring. Start with the inauguration and go from there. Watch the metals, when they dip. It will be a good indication that things are about to happen. I got that little tidbit from my friend at [REDACTED].

NOTE: At this point, my contact asked me to reserve further disclosures until after the inauguration.

SOURCE: http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/52005

Copyright © Douglas Hagmann
Douglas J. Hagmann and his son, Joe Hagmann host The Hagmann & Hagmann Report, a live Internet radio program broadcast each weeknight from 8:00-10:00 p.m. ET.

Douglas Hagmann, founder & director of the Northeast Intelligence Network, and a multi-state licensed private investigative agency. Doug began using his investigative skills and training to fight terrorism and increase public awareness through his website.

Doug can be reached at: director@homelandsecurityus.com

Older articles by Doug Hagmann

Official Communist Press PRAVDA Calls It Like It Is. Communism Won

November 26, 2012 2 comments

TWG:  This story was released a few days ago, but I have not yet posted it because it just seems so obvious to those of us who are paying attention to this horrid regime that the United States has, indeed, been overthrown by the communists, marxists, socialists, progressives, liberals, islamics and the rest of the fascist trolls sitting on thrones around the world.  After receiving a few requests to post this here, I have decided to do so, if for no other reason than to shove it down the throats of the glassy eyed fools who embrace their own demise and have aided and abetted the total destruction of America .  This once great Nation is finished, and we will NEVER see Freedom & Liberty again.  Our Constitution is finished, our Bill Of Rights is finished an our children’s future is now quite bleak.  Anyone who does not see and understand this today is a blind damned fool.   It’s a sad irony that PRAVDA is actually calling this game, but they would know. It takes the victims of communism to see communism for exactly what it is.   They’re all the same beast today.  The communists, socialists, marxists, progressives, liberals, democrats, islamics, fascists and every other world terrorist.  They share their common hatred of Western values, Freedoms, Liberties and Human rights.  We can Thank the so-called “educators”, the “parents” and the “public school system administrators” for this obamination.  I pray every last one of them responsible for this will rot in the hottest spot in Hell reserved for vermin like them.

Russian News Outlet Pravda (Previously the Official Press of the USSR) Labels Obama a ‘Communist’ in Scathing OpEd

The famed Russian news site “Pravda,” which ironically was formed as the official Communist publication of the former Soviet Union, recently released a scathing opinion column entitled, “Obama’s Soviet Mistake,” in which the author unabashedly labels the U.S. president a “Communist without question promoting the Communist Manifesto without calling it so.”

The author, Xavier Lerma, goes on to note how Obama’s “cult of personality” has mesmerized the ignorant in America, who will follow the hope and change icon in much the same way as ”fools” still praise Lenin and Stalin in Russia.

“Obama’s fools and Stalin’s fools share the same drink of illusion.”

Adding an interesting twist to the article, the author juxtaposes President Obama with Vladimir Putin, noting that the Russian president has been sounding more and more like “Ronald Reagan” or other “conservatives in America” who seek to promote smaller government and lower taxes. Lerma attributes the following remarks to Putin regarding the country’s taxes and the economy:

“…we are reducing taxes on production, investing money in the economy. We are optimizing state expenses.

The second possible mistake would be excessive interference into the economic life of the country and the absolute faith into the all-mightiness of the state.

There are no grounds to suggest that by putting the responsibility over to the state, one can achieve better results.

Unreasonable expansion of the budget deficit, accumulation of the national debt – are as destructive as an adventurous stock market game.

During the time of the Soviet Union the role of the state in economy was made absolute, which eventually lead to the total non-competitiveness of the economy. That lesson cost us very dearly. I am sure no one would want history to repeat itself.”

Reading Putin’s speech “without knowing the author,” begins Lerma, “one would think it was written by Reagan or another conservative in America.”

“The speech promotes smaller government and less taxes. It comes as no surprise to those who know Putin as a conservative,” Lerma writes with irony.

After referring to liberalism as a “psychosis,” Lerma blasts ”O’bomber” over Fast and Furious and goes on to state:

He is a Communist without question promoting the Communist Manifesto without calling it so. How shrewd he is in America. His cult of personality mesmerizes those who cannot go beyond their ignorance. They will continue to follow him like those fools who still praise Lenin and Stalin in Russia.  Obama’s fools and Stalin’s fools share the same drink of illusion.

The author questions if Americans have ever read history and concludes that American schools have been “conquered by Communists long ago,” paving the way for a revisionist history that would only lead to the election of a Communist president in the U.S.

“President Vladimir Putin could never have imagined anyone so ignorant or so willing to destroy their people like Obama much less seeing millions vote for someone like Obama,” Lerma quips. But the American president wasn’t the only one to draw the author’s ire. He also noted the pervasive influence of the ACLU and the eroding of America’s Christianity — something that was, of course, also a key tenet of the Soviet Union:

The red, white and blue still flies happily but only in Russia. Russia still has St George defeating the Dragon with the symbol of the cross on its’ flag. The ACLU and other atheist groups in America would never allow the US flag with such religious symbols. Lawsuits a plenty against religious freedom and expression in the land of the free.

Russian News Outlet Pravda (Previously the Official Press of the USSR) Labels Obama a Communist in Scathing OpEd“Christianity in the U.S. is under attack as it was during the early period of the Soviet Union when religious symbols were against the law,” Lerma notes astutely.

In terms of all of the U.S. States that have filed petitions to secede from the union, Lerma coins these Americans” hostages to the Communists in power” who will eventually need to rise up in the face of “tyranny.” Lerma concludes with a powerful comparison of the suffering endured for nearly a century under the oppression and brutality of the USSR and quotes Don Mclean’s famed song, “American Pie”:

Russia lost its’ civil war with the Reds and millions suffered torture and death for almost 75 years under the tyranny of the United Soviet Socialist Republic. Russians survived with a new and stronger faith in God and ever growing Christian Church. The question is how long will the once “Land of the Free” remain the United Socialist States of America?  Their suffering has only begun. Bye bye Miss American Pie!

Those who recall the days of the former Soviet Union, or who have friends and family members who fled a life of degradation, will see much truth in Lerma’s words. Even envisioning the now-famous “Hope” and “Change” campaign posters, which elevated Obama to a cult of personality, strikes fear and anxiety into the hearts of those who lived through eerily similar propaganda behind the iron curtain. It is ironic that this opinion column, so scathing of Communism and so keenly perceptive of how history is repeating itself in President Obama, comes to us from the publication that was formed to be the official Communist mouthpiece of the former Soviet Union itself.

Perhaps that is what lends it all the more weight.

Now should one be mindful of the fact that the author of this opinion column also considers Vladimir Putin a “conservative”? Yes, however, more disturbing still is that Lerma finds Putin conservative in comparison to Obama. Opinions on Putin vary greatly among those living in Russia in much the same way as Americans differ in opinion con President Obama. What’s more, Lerma’s personal views on Putin do not necessarily negate that there is merit to his observations on President Obama. Russians who have witnessed the trappings of the former Soviet Union either during its height or in its aftermath, tend to speak from a place of personal experience — something that warrants careful consideration. Based on our Google search of the author, he does appear to be a Russian columnist for Pravda who also maintains his own conservative-leaning blog.

Shortly after TheBlaze published this article citing Pravda’s opinion column, author David Frum posted a hair-trigger response on his Daily Beast Blog, accusing TheBlaze of agreeing with Pravda on President Obama. Frum disparages Lerma’s “journalistic” credentials and goes on to focus solely on Lerma’s opinions on Vladimir Putin, as well as the Pravda author’s reference to attacks on Christianity in America. Frum does not address any other points raised by Lerma concerning the cult of personality that has been build around Obama, nor the parallels Lerma sees between present-day America and the former Soviet Union. Frum also appears to miss the irony that was the true crux of this Blaze article: That the former official mouthpiece of the Communist Party believes Obama is a Communist and that Putin is Conservative by comparison. That, of course, was the point.

Source: http://www.theblaze.com/stories/russian-news-outlet-pravda-previously-the-official-press-of-the-ussr-labels-obama-a-communist-in-scathing-oped/#

Voter Fraud List, obama Style

November 22, 2012 Leave a comment

Source: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2960108/posts

Find more on voter fraud here: https://twg2a.wordpress.com/category/votercensus-fraud/

 

Obama Voter Fraud

11/15/2012

Citing high number of rural black voters, Maine GOP chair suspects “improprieties” at the polls

19,605 to zero is statistical proof of outright vote fraud in 2012 presidential election

22 Signs That Voter Fraud Is Wildly Out Of Control And The Election Was A Sham

Discrepancies Found in Election Results from Several Swing States

 Florida sends auditors to investigate voting irregularities, as Rep. West holds out hope

11/14/2012

Almost 1K ballots found in Broward elections warehouse

BIG LIST of vote fraud reports

11/13/2012

Up to 10 percent of the ballots cast at a polling station in Pennsylvania reverted to a default, which gave Barack Obama a vote no matter who the voter had selected, according to a poll watcher who was a witness to the proceedings.

11/12/2012

Did Obama Steal The Election?

11/11/2012

Voter fraud? Boston reports 129% voter turnout, 79% for Obama; 74% for Elizabeth Warren

Voter Fraud: Obama Won 108% of Registered Voters in Ohio County

16M White Votes ‘Missing’ – Smell like Election Tampering?

333,000 Votes in 4 Swing States Would Have Given Romney the Presidency

Video: Angry crowd reacts to ‘misleading recount’ in Allen West race

Chairman of the Republican Party of St. Lucie County on the Allen West vote recount (video)

St. Lucie County to hold emergency meeting to recount early votes  (video)

Audio Emerges of Dem Pollster Getting Rid of GOP Inspectors: ‘I Say What the Law Is!’

Obama Likely Won Re-Election Through Election Fraud

Wisconsin Vote Fraud: Federal Job Corps Vans Used to Bus Voters in Wisconsin

From May 2012: The Left’s National Vote Fraud Strategy Exposed

April 2012: Illegal Aliens Caught Voting and Stealing Elections In Florida In Vast Numbers

11/9/2012

First person account of Wisconsin voter fraud

According to the Naval Enlisted Reserve Association, scores of military absentee ballots cast in the 2012 Election will not be counted. U.S. Military personnel and their families are outraged:

Obama Lost in Every State with a Voter Photo-ID Law

Obama Got Over 99% of Vote Where Inspectors were Removed; Turnout Somehow “30%” Above Gov’t Numbers

Vast Majority of Voters Concerned About Federal Government Corruption

11/7/2012

One out of five registered Ohio voters is bogus (9/17/2012)

Complaint Filed over Illegal Alien Voters

11/6/2012

As voters head to polls, reports of problems start pouring in (Video)

Report: Two Ohio Election Judges Removed for Allowing Unregistered Voters to Cast Ballots

Chicago Source Tells Author Brad Thor: Obama Campaign Planning to Proclaim Early Victory to ‘Demoralize Romney Supporters’

GOP U.S. Senate candidate: Poll worker told me to vote for Democrats only

Progressive Chinese Group Passing Out Fake Ballots at Boston Polling Place Instructing People to Vote Obama & Elizabeth Warren

Election Judge Wears Obama CapWhile Checking in Voters in Obama’sChicago Ward

FRAUD: Democrat- “Already Voted Twice Today, Once in MO, Once in KS”

Obama Poster Hanging in Florida Polling Station

Obama mural inside polling place in Philly

Report of GOP vote observer chased by man claiming to have gun

Detroit Polls: Obama Campaigner Punches Voter in Face

Black Panthers Return to Philly, GOP Tossed Out UPDATE: FIGHT

Return of the New Black Panthers: Members .. are again stalking the polls in Philadelphia.

Judge issuing order to reinstate booted Philadelphia election officials, Republicans say

ICE Releases Docs Detailing Electronic Surveillance Problems, Demands Them Back a Year Later

Former DNC Chair Howard Dean: The Only Way We Lose Is Through Fraud

Exclusive: Faked Tea Party Flyer Urges OH Voters to Defeat ‘N***er in the White House’

NPR reports today 75% of Cuban Americans in FL voting Romney because Obamas actions remind them of Castro

Brit Hume on presidential polling: ‘There’s something wrong here’

11/5/2012

Obama’s Army of Illegal Election Workers

Allegation of unions putting illegal immigrants on voter rolls clouds Nevada voting

Non-citizens registered to vote in Lawrence, but officials shrug

Las Vegas Columnist Meets Noncitizens Who Say Union Pressured Them to Register Then Cast Vote

 VA: Military absentee ballots going AWOL in 2012

Oops: MSNBC Accidentally Publishes Election Results Showing Obama Win

Liberals, MSM Preemptively Attacking Voter Fraud Watchdog Groups

OH Union Members Caught with Truckload of Stolen Romney Signs

Sen. Vitter Labels Justice Dept. ‘Campaign Arm’ for Obama, Demands Deportation of Illegals Who Vote

Justice Dept. Sending Observers to Monitor Tuesday’s Election–In Queens, N.Y.

11/3/2012

N.C. Democrat admits he’s voted 4 times already and will vote again on election day

NAACP Takes Over Houston Polling Station, Advocates for President Obama

‘Dozens’ of Colorado Romney Voters Claim Machines Changed Votes to Obama

‘Hitler’ appears on Ohio voter registration form

Team Obama Hands Out Free Pizza at Florida Early Voting Stations

11/2/2012

 Claims increase of machines switching votes in Ohio, other battlegrounds

GOP wants Ohio voting machines fixed 6 states asked to recalibrate before Election Day

Republican National Committee alleges voting machine troubles in Nevada, other swing states

11/1/2012

VIDEO: Eyewitness of Somali Muslim voter fraud in OHIO by Obama camp

More Electronic Voting Machines Changing Romney Votes to Obama: We Looked Into It and Here’s What a Vendor Told Us

10/31/2012

Ohio: More voting problems as ballot cast for Romney comes up Obama

 

NRA Supported Politician Wins “Gun Control” (Anti-Second Amendment) Award

November 19, 2012 Leave a comment

.
.
“The NRA, behind the scenes, has brokered, compromised,
and then endorsed every major anti Second Amendment
federal law passed for the last 30 years…”
C.E. Lovell, NRA Board Member 1980-93

NRA director-supported politician wins gun control award

 

The Illinois Council Against Handgun Violence presented awards to two Prairie State politicians, the Associated Press reported today. Governor Pat Quinn and outgoing Rep. Bob Dold were both given leadership awards last week, Quinn for trying to ban semi-automatic firearms, and “suburban Chicago Republican” Dold for “cross[ing] party lines to oppose ‘dangerous’ gun legislation.”

Replacing another Republican gun-grabber Mark Kirk in January, 2011, Dold’s anti-gun sympathies have been clear from the start. The political positions reporting website, “On the Issues,” revealed Dold “Supports restricting gun purchase & possession,” dating their entry “Nov. 2010.”

 

CONTINUE READING:  www.examiner.com/article/nra-director-supported-politician-wins-gun-control-award?CID=examiner_alerts_article

2012 Election Fraud. The M.O. Of The Dims.

November 19, 2012 Leave a comment

TWG: After reading several different articles on the issue of rampant voter fraud in the 2012 “election” process, I wanted to find a “master list” of cases to post here on TWG.  Thus far, this is the most comprehensive list I could find.  I’ll post more info as it becomes available.  It’s incomprehensible that so many in this Country could be so ignorant as to re-elect the marxist regime currently in power.   It’s the most blatant and dangerous case of apathy we’ve ever seen.  It seems half this nation doesn’t know what’s going on and doesn’t care what’s going on.  All they want is their own candy and to Hell with everyone else and to Hell with America.   Thank the so-called “educators”.   We knew we’d have voter fraud, but the scope of this fraud is jaw dropping.   Where’s those UN “voter fraud investigators” sent here to monitor our elections?   Like racism, in the minds of the glassy eyed idiots, only the crackas and conservatives could be guilty of such abhorrent behavior.]

 

November 13, 2012

Was the 2012 Election Stolen?

By Selwyn Duke

As the 2012 election approached, conservative enthusiasm grew. Mitt Romney was drawing huge crowds while Barack Obama spoke in half-filled stadiums. All the passion lay on the right while the left was discouraged with a promised messiah who proved merely a politician. And the prediction was that, in contrast to 2008, Republican turnout would dwarf the tuned-out and carry the day. Hence the shock November 6 eve. How could Romney lose, especially by such a wide electoral margin?

Maybe he didn’t

At least not legitimately.

Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/11/was_the_2012_election_stolen.html#ixzz2CgqWKJBT

 

Gun Store: obama Voters NOT WELCOME!

November 17, 2012 2 comments

Gun Store: Obama Voters Not Welcome

 

Gun Store: Obama Voters Not Welcome

Nov 16, 2012

By Todd Starnes

The owner of an Arizona gun store said he will not sell weapons to customers who voted for President Obama because “you have proven that you are not responsible enough to own a firearm.”

Cope Reynolds, owner of the Southwest Shooting Authority in Pinetop, Ariz., posted the new store policy in a newspaper advertisement — as well as on a sign posted on the front door.

“If you voted for Barack Obama your business is not welcome at Southwest Shooting Authority,” the ad reads. “You have proven that you are not responsible enough to own a firearm.”

The Southwest Shooting Authority is a family-owned, family-run business that Reynolds opened in 2004. He told Fox News that he’s absolutely serious about the new policy.

“I’m a small business owner,” he said. “If you are dumb enough to vote for Obama again – after four years of this — I don’t think you are responsible enough to own a firearm. I don’t care who it makes mad.”

Reynolds acknowledged that folks coming into his store probably didn’t vote for Obama anyway, but he’s still making a statement. He said he’s concerned about how President Obama’s policies could impact his small business.

He also posted a letter on the Ammoland website that read in part:

“To Whom it May Concern:

I thought you all might be interested in this. We will try to demonstrate once again that the bottom line for our business is principle, not money. Yes, it has been damaging at times but our values are intact. Effective immediately, if you voted for Obama, your money is no good here. You have proven beyond a doubt that you are not responsible enough to own a firearm. We have just put a sign up on the front door to save you the trouble of walking all the way in here.”

Reynolds said they’ve been deluged with telephone calls from supportive Americans — some from as far away as New York and New Jersey. One caller placed an order for hundreds of dollars worth of ammunition.

But others have not been so supportive. Reynolds said there have been lots of “vile, rude, and hateful comments.”

“I hate it because my 17-year-old son answers the phone and the light into him,” Reynolds said. “They call us stupid rednecks and racist.”

The family has also received two death threats. But Reynolds said he’s not that worried about safety.

“We’re able to wear our guns in Arizona and we wear on 24-7,” he said. “We train regularly.”

At the end of the day, Reynolds said it really doesn’t matter what happens to his company — the signs are staying up.

“If we lose the whole business it doesn’t matter,” he said. “The bottom line is — my values.”

 

[TWG: I LOVE THIS!  It is SO true! Anyone voting for marxism and all the lies and trash they bring with them is definitely NOT responsible enough to own, or be trusted with, firearms. They've proven, by their actions, that they lack the intelligence and the integrity to handle firearms.]

Montana Conservatives WIN, Passing Several Key Initiatives

November 8, 2012 11 comments

MONTANA VOTERS PASSED THE FOLLOWING INITIATIVES IN THE 2012 GENERAL ELECTION!!!  

LR-120 ( HB 627 )
Subject: Referendum to require parental notification prior to abortion for a minor, providing for judicial waiver of notification, repealing prior statutes, and providing penalties.

LR-121 ( HB 638 )
Subject: Referendum to deny certain state services to illegal aliens.

LR-122 ( SB 418 )
Subject: Referendum to prohibit the state or federal government from mandating the purchase of health insurance or imposing penalties for decisions related to purchasing health insurance.

IR-124
Subject: Referendum on SB 423, a bill which repeals I-148 and enacts a new medical marijuana program.

I-166
Subject: Charge Montana elected and appointed officials, state and federal, with implementing a policy that corporations are not human beings with constitutional rights.

MONTANANS ALSO MAINTAINED CONTROL OF OUR HOUSE AND SENATE. ROMNEY WON THE STATEWIDE VOTE.

Infamous Noor Terror Mosque in Ohio is a …….. Polling place

November 5, 2012 Leave a comment

One of [Pamela Gellar's] readers just received her assigned polling place for tomorrow’s election: the Noor terror-linked mosque. Read the 35-page memorandum submitted to the Florida court on the mosque’s terror links. Would you want to vote there? Would you trust the results coming out of this hotbed of jihadist activity? And why expose the secular populace to dawah and proselytizing?

This is madness…….

[TWG Note: Where's the whiners who incessantly scream and moan about "Separation of Church and State"?]

CONTINUE READING: http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2012/11/infamous-noor-terror-mosque-in-ohio-is-a-polling-place.html

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,547 other followers

%d bloggers like this: